本文選題：毛澤東　切入點(diǎn)：斯大林　出處：《曲阜師范大學(xué)》2010年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】： 蘇南兩黨曾經(jīng)是世界社會(huì)主義陣營里老大哥和小兄弟一般的友好伙伴,這樣一對(duì)情同手足的兄弟,在二戰(zhàn)結(jié)束不久卻勢不兩立、劍拔弩張,以致蘇聯(lián)操縱歐洲共產(chǎn)黨情報(bào)局將懷有“鐵托主義”的南斯拉夫作為異教徒逐出教門。 想不到的是,城門失火,殃及池魚。由于鐵托的不馴服而引起的狂風(fēng)暴雨般的批判和斗爭,致使俄國人對(duì)以毛澤東為首的中國共產(chǎn)黨也備生醋意,懷疑毛澤東是“亞洲的鐵托”,以毛澤東為首的中國共產(chǎn)黨人奉行的政策是“亞洲鐵托主義”,擔(dān)心中國會(huì)同南斯拉夫一樣走上一條獨(dú)立于蘇聯(lián)的道路。同時(shí),西方也別有用心地趁火打劫,為“亞洲鐵托主義”推波助瀾、添油加醋。美國國家安全委員會(huì)所屬的國務(wù)院計(jì)劃署有一份分析報(bào)告,其中就大肆宣揚(yáng)“亞洲鐵托主義”,并將其納入“楔子戰(zhàn)略”當(dāng)中。直到1950年,朝鮮戰(zhàn)爭爆發(fā)后,毛澤東和中共中央經(jīng)過艱難的抉擇,從斯大林手里接過了出兵援朝這個(gè)“燙手的山芋”,斯大林才改變了看法,最終相信毛澤東是國際主義者,接受了這位長期讓他懷疑的盟友。 “亞洲鐵托主義”,不論是在東方,還是在西方都鬧得沸沸揚(yáng)揚(yáng),引起軒然大波,成為人們關(guān)注的焦點(diǎn),它究竟緣何而起?其成因則顯得撲朔迷離,令人匪夷所思,蒙上了一層神秘的面紗。 顧名思義,“亞洲鐵托主義”是東西方世界在中國革命勝利前后對(duì)以毛澤東為首的中國共產(chǎn)黨堅(jiān)持從實(shí)際出發(fā),不照搬蘇聯(lián)的經(jīng)驗(yàn)和模式,把馬克思主義的普遍真理與中國革命的具體實(shí)踐相結(jié)合,抵制蘇聯(lián)的控制和干涉,獨(dú)立自主地處理本黨和本國的內(nèi)外事務(wù),與南斯拉夫“鐵托主義”具有共性的理論與實(shí)踐的一種歪曲概括。 對(duì)于“亞洲鐵托主義”成因的研究,國內(nèi)外學(xué)術(shù)界僅有只言片語的論述,幾乎沒有專門、集中、系統(tǒng)的對(duì)這一問題展開論證。本文則立足于國際關(guān)系學(xué)的角度,運(yùn)用比較分析法、心理分析法、歷史分析法、演繹歸納法等多種方法,盡可能科學(xué)、客觀的歸納總結(jié)出“亞洲鐵托主義”的成因。仔細(xì)的考察歷史,透過層層迷霧,本文認(rèn)為“亞洲鐵托主義”是由錯(cuò)綜復(fù)雜的多種因素所引起的,概括起來有五個(gè)方面：第一,南斯拉夫和中國革命的相似性；第二,東方陣營里的讒言；第三,西方陣營里的離間；第四,斯大林與毛澤東的分歧；第五,中蘇兩黨利益的碰撞。 對(duì)于“亞洲鐵托主義”成因的探究,不僅在現(xiàn)當(dāng)代國際關(guān)系史的研究中,而且在現(xiàn)當(dāng)代國際共產(chǎn)主義運(yùn)動(dòng)史的研究中都占有特別重要的地位。通過對(duì)“亞洲鐵托主義”成因的考察和分析,有助于研究社會(huì)主義陣營國家之間關(guān)系的演變及其影響,對(duì)正確處理社會(huì)主義國家、東西方國家之間的關(guān)系,選擇本民族的發(fā)展道路,都具有重要的借鑒意義。
[Abstract]:The two parties in Sunan were once friendly partners like Big Brother and Little Brothers in the socialist camp of the world. Such a pair of fraternal brothers, who were close to each other shortly after the end of World War II, were at loggerheads. So that the Soviet Union manipulated the European Communist Intelligence Agency to evict the Tito-minded Yugoslavia as a heretic. Unexpectedly, the fire at the city gate brought disaster to the pond fish. The fierce criticism and struggle caused by Tito's untamed nature made the Russians jealous of the Communist Party of China, headed by Mao Zedong. It is suspected that Mao Zedong is the "Tito of Asia", and the policy pursued by the Chinese Communists, led by Mao Zedong, is "Asian Tito Doctrine", fearing that China, like Yugoslavia, will embark on a path of independence from the Soviet Union. At the same time, The West also has ulterior motives to take advantage of the robbery, adding fuel to the "Asian Tito Doctrine". The State Department Program, which belongs to the US National Security Council, has an analysis report. Among them, "Asian Tito Doctrine" was widely promoted and incorporated into the "Wedge Strategy." until 1950, after the Korean War broke out, Mao Zedong and the CPC Central Committee made a difficult choice. Taking over from Stalin, Stalin changed his mind, believing that Mao Zedong was an internationalist and accepted his long-suspected ally. "Asian Tito Doctrine", whether in the East or in the West, has caused a great uproar and become the focus of people's attention. Why did it start?. Its causes appear to be confusing, unthinkable, covered with a mysterious veil. As its name implies, "Asian Tito Doctrine" is the experience and model of the East and West to the Communist Party of China, headed by Mao Zedong, that the East and the West insisted on proceeding from reality before and after the victory of the Chinese Revolution, and did not copy the experience and model of the Soviet Union. Combine the universal truth of Marxism with the concrete practice of the Chinese revolution, resist the control and interference of the Soviet Union, and independently handle the internal and external affairs of our party and our own country. A distorted summary of the theory and practice common to Tito-ism in Yugoslavia. For the study of the cause of "Asian Tito Doctrine", the academic circles at home and abroad have only a few words, almost no special, concentrated, systematic demonstration of this problem. This paper is based on the perspective of international relations. By means of comparative analysis, psychological analysis, historical analysis, deductive induction and other methods, the causes of "Asian Tito Doctrine" are summed up as scientifically and objectively as possible. This paper argues that "Asian Tito Doctrine" is caused by many complicated factors, which can be summed up in five aspects: first, the similarity between Yugoslavia and Chinese revolution; second, calumny in the Eastern camp; third, A rift in the Western camp; 4th, the split between Stalin and Mao Zedong; 5th, a collision between Chinese and Soviet interests. The study of the causes of "Asian Tito Doctrine" is not only in the study of the history of contemporary international relations, Moreover, they all play a particularly important role in the study of the history of the modern and contemporary international communist movement. Through the investigation and analysis of the causes of "Asian Tito Doctrine", it is helpful to study the evolution and influence of the relations between the countries of the socialist camp. It is of great significance to correctly handle the relations between the socialist countries, the eastern and western countries, and choose the development path of our own nation.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：曲阜師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2010
【分類號(hào)】：K153

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 馬若義;皖南事變后國共關(guān)系由對(duì)抗走向緩和的歷史考察[J];安徽大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);1998年03期

2 林軍;解放戰(zhàn)爭時(shí)期的中共與蘇聯(lián)[J];北方論叢;1996年05期

3 張冠文;視聽傳媒中的西方文化霸權(quán)及抵御對(duì)策[J];編輯之友;2004年01期

4 沈志華;;“鐵托道路”是怎么形成的?——一九四八年蘇南沖突始末[J];百年潮;1999年10期

5 孔凡河;從司徒雷登北平之行夭折透視杜魯門政府對(duì)華政策[J];黨史研究與教學(xué);2005年02期

6 邢和明;毛澤東與鐵托[J];黨史縱覽;2004年11期

7 陳志杰;淺論解放戰(zhàn)爭時(shí)期蘇聯(lián)對(duì)華政策失誤的的原因[J];淮北煤師院學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);1998年01期

8 張盛發(fā);從消極冷漠到積極支持——論1945－1949年斯大林對(duì)中國革命的立場和態(tài)度[J];世界歷史;1999年06期

9 張小明;美國對(duì)中蘇同盟的認(rèn)識(shí)與反應(yīng)[J];歷史研究;1999年05期

10 蘇開華;大革命前后毛澤東路線與斯大林路線比較研究[J];毛澤東鄧小平理論研究;1995年02期

，

本文編號(hào)：1565639