【摘要】：文化遺產(chǎn)保護(hù)規(guī)劃體系的構(gòu)建是我國區(qū)別于其他國家文化遺產(chǎn)保護(hù)的特色,是最近十余年我國文物保護(hù)工作的一種新方法,由文物保護(hù)工作理念、城市規(guī)劃模式綜合形成。由于缺少系統(tǒng)完善的理論體系支撐,文化遺產(chǎn)保護(hù)規(guī)劃在實(shí)際的工作中仍然面臨著一些問題,現(xiàn)有的規(guī)劃方法不足以應(yīng)對。本文首次將景觀規(guī)劃領(lǐng)域的“反規(guī)劃”理論引入文化遺產(chǎn)保護(hù)規(guī)劃中,提出“文化遺產(chǎn)保護(hù)反規(guī)劃”概念并對其涵義進(jìn)行界定。對現(xiàn)有規(guī)劃體系與“反規(guī)劃”理論體系進(jìn)行比較,分析二者之間的區(qū)別與聯(lián)系,凸顯“反規(guī)劃”理論的優(yōu)越性以及在文化遺產(chǎn)保護(hù)規(guī)劃中的適用性。 本文以甘泉宮遺址為案例,借鑒“反規(guī)劃”理論,采用逆向思維提出遺址的保護(hù)規(guī)劃策略：第一,保護(hù)優(yōu)先,確立遺址安全格局；第二,采用最低干預(yù)進(jìn)行展示規(guī)劃；第三,根據(jù)考古工作的進(jìn)展,運(yùn)用彈性規(guī)劃方法對遺址區(qū)居民進(jìn)行安置。以期對同類型的文化遺產(chǎn)保護(hù)規(guī)劃提供參考,并能夠突破城市規(guī)劃框架結(jié)構(gòu)對文化遺產(chǎn)保護(hù)規(guī)劃的限制,構(gòu)建更加完善、科學(xué)、合理的文化遺產(chǎn)保護(hù)規(guī)劃理論體系。
[Abstract]:The construction of cultural heritage protection planning system is a special feature of cultural heritage protection in our country, which is a new method of cultural relic protection in our country in the last ten years. It is formed by the concept of cultural relic protection and the mode of urban planning. Due to the lack of systematic and perfect theoretical system, the cultural heritage protection planning still faces some problems in the practical work, and the existing planning methods are not enough to deal with it. In this paper, the theory of "anti-planning" in the field of landscape planning is introduced into the planning of cultural heritage conservation for the first time, and the concept of "anti-planning of cultural heritage protection" is put forward and its meaning is defined. This paper compares the existing planning system with the "anti-planning" theoretical system, analyzes the difference and relationship between them, and highlights the superiority of the "anti-planning" theory and its applicability in the planning of cultural heritage protection. This paper takes the Gan Quan Palace site as an example, draws lessons from the theory of "counter-planning", and puts forward the protection planning strategy of the site by using reverse thinking: first, to protect the site first, to establish the site safety pattern; second, to use the minimum intervention to carry out the display planning; Thirdly, according to the progress of archaeological work, the flexible planning method is used to resettle the residents of the site area. In order to provide reference for the same type of cultural heritage protection planning, and to break through the restrictions of urban planning framework on cultural heritage protection planning, and to build a more perfect, scientific and reasonable theoretical system of cultural heritage protection planning.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西北大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：G122

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 單霽翔;;城市化進(jìn)程中的文化遺產(chǎn)保護(hù)[J];北京觀察;2006年05期

2 彭德勝;“反規(guī)劃”理論在城市總體規(guī)劃中的應(yīng)用——以沅江市城市總體規(guī)劃為例[J];城市發(fā)展研究;2005年01期

3 陳穩(wěn)亮;;大遺址保護(hù)中的彈性規(guī)劃策略研究——基于雍城遺址保護(hù)的思考[J];城市發(fā)展研究;2009年08期

4 趙中樞;從文物保護(hù)到歷史文化名城保護(hù)——概念的擴(kuò)大與保護(hù)方法的多樣化[J];城市規(guī)劃;2001年10期

5 李萱,趙民;舊城改造中歷史文化遺產(chǎn)保護(hù)的經(jīng)濟(jì)分析[J];城市規(guī)劃;2002年07期

6 俞孔堅,李迪華,韓西麗;論“反規(guī)劃”[J];城市規(guī)劃;2005年09期

7 陳穩(wěn)亮;張祖群;趙榮;;大遺址保護(hù)的PRED協(xié)調(diào)發(fā)展案例與模式——基于漢長安城的實(shí)證與思考[J];城市規(guī)劃;2006年07期

8 王景慧;;城市規(guī)劃與文化遺產(chǎn)保護(hù)[J];城市規(guī)劃;2006年11期

9 單霽翔;;城市文化遺產(chǎn)保護(hù)與文化城市建設(shè)[J];城市規(guī)劃;2007年05期

10 俞孔堅;陳晨;牛靜;;最少干預(yù)——綠林中的紅飄帶 秦皇島湯河濱河公園設(shè)計[J];城市環(huán)境設(shè)計;2007年01期

，

本文編號：2328018