本文選題：葛蘭西　切入點(diǎn)：有機(jī)知識(shí)分子　出處：《福建師范大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：葛蘭西知識(shí)分子理論的提出,是從社會(huì)生產(chǎn)角度繼承和發(fā)展馬克思的知識(shí)分子觀,從實(shí)踐角度超越克羅齊歷史哲學(xué)中的知識(shí)分子論,以及從知識(shí)分子掌握文化領(lǐng)導(dǎo)權(quán)的角度綜合索列爾和列寧革命思想的結(jié)果。葛蘭西從經(jīng)濟(jì)、意識(shí)形態(tài)和政治的總體性聯(lián)系出發(fā),在承認(rèn)經(jīng)濟(jì)基礎(chǔ)的最終決定作用前提下,賦予意識(shí)形態(tài)和國(guó)家機(jī)器顯著的自主性,并把市民社會(huì)內(nèi)在于“完全國(guó)家”概念中,突出文化與意識(shí)形態(tài)的重要性,提出有機(jī)知識(shí)分子的歷史使命,即激發(fā)社會(huì)批判意識(shí),在文化道德和職業(yè)技術(shù)方面發(fā)揮教育大眾的職能,將個(gè)人的自由意志整合為集體意志,建構(gòu)總體性的歷史集團(tuán),贏得市民社會(huì)文化領(lǐng)導(dǎo)權(quán)陣地戰(zhàn)的勝利。 中國(guó)知識(shí)分子應(yīng)當(dāng)立足非同一性的當(dāng)代語(yǔ)境,既要借鑒葛蘭西關(guān)于文化領(lǐng)導(dǎo)權(quán)爭(zhēng)奪戰(zhàn)的思路,警惕西方文化意識(shí)形態(tài)的滲透,維護(hù)國(guó)家文化安全,致力于世界文化多樣性的發(fā)展,又要借鑒葛蘭西的商談機(jī)制,建立包容差異而融貫一致的社會(huì)主義新文化。在革命政治日益轉(zhuǎn)向話語(yǔ)政治的當(dāng)代中國(guó),知識(shí)分子要吸收有機(jī)知識(shí)分子批判精神,塑造“抵抗的知識(shí)分子”的社會(huì)角色。 當(dāng)代科技發(fā)達(dá)的資本主義社會(huì)暴露了有機(jī)知識(shí)分子理論的局限性：有機(jī)知識(shí)分子革命實(shí)踐的可能性甚微,烏托邦理想現(xiàn)實(shí)化導(dǎo)致專制主義產(chǎn)生,對(duì)知識(shí)分子“有機(jī)性”的強(qiáng)調(diào)恰恰消解了“有機(jī)性”的內(nèi)容,這都應(yīng)受到深刻反思,以適應(yīng)時(shí)代發(fā)展。
[Abstract]:The proposition of Gramsci's theory of intellectuals is to inherit and develop Marx's view of intellectuals from the angle of social production, and to transcend the theory of intellectuals in Croce's historical philosophy from the point of view of practice. And from the angle of intellectuals' mastery of cultural leadership, it synthesizes the results of Solier's and Lenin's revolutionary thoughts. Gramsci, proceeding from the overall connection among economy, ideology and politics, recognizes the final decisive role of the economic base. Giving the ideology and the state machine remarkable autonomy, putting the civil society in the concept of "complete state", highlighting the importance of culture and ideology, putting forward the historical mission of the organic intellectuals, that is, arousing the social critical consciousness. In the aspect of cultural morality and vocational technology, the function of educating the masses, integrating individual free will into collective will, constructing a total historical group, and winning the victory of civil society cultural leadership battle. Chinese intellectuals should base themselves on the contemporary context of non-identity. They should draw lessons from Gramsci's ideas on the struggle for cultural leadership, guard against the infiltration of western cultural ideology, and safeguard national cultural security. Committed to the development of cultural diversity in the world, and drawing lessons from Gramsci's negotiation mechanism, we should establish a new socialist culture that embraces differences and melts consistent. In contemporary China, where revolutionary politics is increasingly turning to discourse politics, Intellectuals should absorb the critical spirit of organic intellectuals and shape the social role of "resistant intellectuals". The modern capitalist society with advanced science and technology exposed the limitations of the organic intellectual theory: the organic intellectuals had little possibility of revolutionary practice, the utopian ideal reality led to autocracy. The emphasis on the "organic nature" of intellectuals has precisely eliminated the content of "organic nature", which should be deeply reconsidered in order to adapt to the development of the times.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：福建師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：G05

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前3條

1 周興杰;;葛蘭西的知識(shí)分子觀與文化研究領(lǐng)域的知識(shí)分子轉(zhuǎn)型[J];探求;2008年03期

2 張興成;;現(xiàn)代性與文化帝國(guó)主義[J];西南大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2010年01期

3 仰海峰;;葛蘭西對(duì)克羅齊哲學(xué)的批判改造[J];現(xiàn)代哲學(xué);2005年02期

，

本文編號(hào)：1654439