本文關(guān)鍵詞： 公共文化服務(wù) 數(shù)字版權(quán) 權(quán)利限制 法定許可　出處：《出版科學(xué)》2017年05期 　論文類型：期刊論文

【摘要】：數(shù)字化是公共文化服務(wù)的重要趨勢(shì),而由數(shù)字技術(shù)帶來(lái)的版權(quán)擴(kuò)張卻使公共文化服務(wù)與數(shù)字版權(quán)之間的沖突加劇。公共文化服務(wù)與數(shù)字版權(quán)的沖突本質(zhì)上是公益與私權(quán)的沖突,但"限制私權(quán)、維護(hù)公益"的慣常做法并不能緩解二者之間的緊張關(guān)系。根據(jù)權(quán)利限制的基本原理,公共文化服務(wù)所要實(shí)現(xiàn)的"公益"必須建立在版權(quán)這一"私權(quán)"得到充分實(shí)現(xiàn)的基礎(chǔ)之上。相對(duì)于合理使用和版權(quán)補(bǔ)償金,法定許可更符合平衡公共文化服務(wù)中"私權(quán)"與"公益"的要求,有必要在版權(quán)法框架內(nèi)對(duì)公共文化服務(wù)法定許可使用制度進(jìn)行完善。
[Abstract]:Digitalization is an important trend of public cultural service, but the expansion of copyright brought by digital technology intensifies the conflict between public cultural service and digital copyright. The conflict between public cultural service and digital copyright is essentially a conflict between public interest and private right. However, the usual practice of "restricting private rights and safeguarding public good" does not alleviate the tension between the two. According to the basic principle of the restriction of rights, The "public welfare" of public cultural services must be based on the full realization of copyright as a private right. Legal license meets the requirement of balancing private right and public good in public cultural service. It is necessary to perfect the legal license system of public cultural service within the framework of copyright law.
【作者單位】： 華東政法大學(xué)科學(xué)研究院;
【基金】：國(guó)家社會(huì)科學(xué)基金藝術(shù)學(xué)重大項(xiàng)目“國(guó)家文化治理能力和體系現(xiàn)代化建設(shè)研究”(14ZD04)階段性研究成果
【分類號(hào)】：D923.41;G249.2
，

本文編號(hào)：1510446