歐盟對華決策中的主體間認(rèn)知差異評析
發(fā)布時(shí)間：2019-07-10 11:30
【摘要】：近年來,歐盟對華決策中的主體間認(rèn)知差異間題日益突出,對中歐關(guān)系所產(chǎn)生的影響也越來越明顯�；诖�,本文以對外決策中的認(rèn)知差異為理論視角,探討歐盟對華決策中主體間認(rèn)知差異對于中歐關(guān)系所產(chǎn)生的影響。“主體間認(rèn)知差異”包含了“歐盟內(nèi)部各決策主體之間的認(rèn)知差異”與“歐盟與中國(政府)之間的認(rèn)知差異”兩個(gè)方面。本文以各領(lǐng)域?qū)χ袣W關(guān)系所造成的負(fù)面影響的嚴(yán)重程度由重至輕把“認(rèn)知差異”劃分為政治、文化、經(jīng)濟(jì)以及外交與安全四個(gè)領(lǐng)域。本文列舉了各領(lǐng)域中所存在的三或四個(gè)主體間認(rèn)知差異問題,進(jìn)而運(yùn)用總結(jié)歸納法從“歐盟內(nèi)部的認(rèn)知差異”、“歐盟與中國之間的認(rèn)知差異”、“認(rèn)知差異形成的主要原因”以及“對中歐關(guān)系所形成的影響”四個(gè)角度總結(jié)出各領(lǐng)域的特點(diǎn)。并在此基礎(chǔ)上,總結(jié)出不同類型的主體間認(rèn)知差異對中歐關(guān)系起到怎樣的影響。 本文首先從理論上演繹對外決策中的認(rèn)知差異。闡述在對外決策中,認(rèn)知主體的指示對象、認(rèn)知客體所包括的范圍、認(rèn)知差異的表現(xiàn)形式、產(chǎn)生認(rèn)知差異的原因以及認(rèn)知差異在對外決策中產(chǎn)生的影響。接著進(jìn)一步比較系統(tǒng)地闡述歐盟對華決策中的認(rèn)知差異問題。歐盟的對華決策主體包括了官方和非官方兩個(gè)層面,官方層面包括歐盟三大機(jī)構(gòu)以及成員國政府,而非官方層面包括智庫、媒體以及普通民眾。歐盟的對華認(rèn)知差異表現(xiàn)在兩個(gè)方面,一是歐盟內(nèi)部各主體間的認(rèn)知差異,二是歐盟與中國之間的認(rèn)知差異。歐盟的對華認(rèn)知差異涉及領(lǐng)域政治領(lǐng)域、文化領(lǐng)域、經(jīng)濟(jì)領(lǐng)域、以及外交與安全領(lǐng)域。歐盟對華認(rèn)知差異存在三種不同狀況,且每種狀況所產(chǎn)生的影響也有所不同。歐盟對華認(rèn)知差異的形成因素包括認(rèn)知主體、認(rèn)知客體、認(rèn)知情景和信息傳遞四個(gè)方面。 在政治領(lǐng)域,歐盟內(nèi)部的認(rèn)知較一致,中歐之間的認(rèn)知差異尖銳對立甚至截然相反,核心價(jià)值觀的沖突和對核心國家利益的挑戰(zhàn)成為該領(lǐng)域差異形成的主要原因,該領(lǐng)域的主體間認(rèn)知差異對中歐關(guān)系產(chǎn)生了嚴(yán)重性、長期性和難以調(diào)和的負(fù)面影響。在文化領(lǐng)域,歐盟內(nèi)部的認(rèn)知較一致,中歐之間的認(rèn)知差異明顯,文化背景和歷史發(fā)展進(jìn)程的差異成為該領(lǐng)域差異形成的主要原因,該領(lǐng)域的主體間認(rèn)知差異對中歐關(guān)系產(chǎn)生了長期、間接性和難以調(diào)和的負(fù)面影響。在經(jīng)貿(mào)領(lǐng)域,歐盟內(nèi)部各決策主體之間存在一定的認(rèn)知差異,中歐之間也存在一定差異但通過對話與協(xié)商可以彌合,經(jīng)濟(jì)利益的博弈和衡量標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的差異成為該領(lǐng)域差異形成的主要原因,該領(lǐng)域的認(rèn)知差異對中歐關(guān)系產(chǎn)生的負(fù)面影響短期、非嚴(yán)重和可調(diào)和性的。在外交與安全領(lǐng)域,歐盟內(nèi)部各決策主體之間存在一定的認(rèn)知差異,中歐之間也存在一定差異但通過對話與協(xié)商可以彌合,利益的博弈和價(jià)值觀的沖突成為該領(lǐng)域差異形成的主要原因,該領(lǐng)域的認(rèn)知差異對中歐關(guān)系產(chǎn)生的負(fù)面影響短期、可控和可調(diào)和性的。 在未來一段時(shí)期里,產(chǎn)生主體間認(rèn)知差異的四個(gè)因素都會發(fā)生一些變化。對于中國而言,應(yīng)對歐盟對華決策中的主體間認(rèn)知差異問題,中國在心理上應(yīng)該以理性而冷靜的眼光看待這一問題,認(rèn)識到該問題的廣泛性、長期性和復(fù)雜性,并制訂具體的對策以應(yīng)對之。 在進(jìn)行經(jīng)過詳細(xì)的分析后,最后總結(jié)出本文的結(jié)論：歐盟對華決策中的主體間認(rèn)知差異對中歐關(guān)系的影響具有多重性。中歐關(guān)系不僅受到中歐之間的認(rèn)知差異的影響,也受到歐盟內(nèi)部決策主體之間的認(rèn)知差異的影響。總體上看,受歐盟決策機(jī)制的影響,歐盟內(nèi)部決策主體之間的認(rèn)知差異對中歐關(guān)系的影響具有兩面性：一方面當(dāng)中歐在此類問題上發(fā)生摩擦?xí)r,歐盟內(nèi)部的認(rèn)知差異會防止中歐在此問題上進(jìn)一步惡化；另一方面當(dāng)中歐在此類問題上需要再向前發(fā)展時(shí),歐盟內(nèi)部的認(rèn)知差異會防礙中歐在此類問題上合作的深化。
[Abstract]:In recent years, the inter-subjectivity in the EU's decision-making in China has become more and more prominent, and the impact on China-EU relations has become more and more obvious. Based on this, this paper, based on the cognitive differences in foreign policy-making, discusses the impact of the EU-China's cognitive differences on China-EU relations in the decision-making of China. The "inter-body cognitive difference" contains both "The cognitive difference between the decision-making bodies within the EU" and "Cognitive Differences between the EU and China (Government)". This paper divides the "cognitive difference" into four areas: politics, culture, economy and diplomacy and security. In this paper, the problems of the three or four main subjects in various fields are listed, and the characteristics of each field are summarized from the "Cognitive Differences in the EU", the "The Cognitive Differences between the EU and China", the "The main causes of the formation of cognitive difference" and the "The impact on the relations between China and Europe" by using the summary induction method. On this basis, the effect of different types of inter-body cognitive differences on China-EU relations is summarized. In this paper, the cognitive difference in foreign decision-making is deduced from the theory In the foreign policy-making, the target of the cognitive subject, the range of the cognitive object, the expression of the cognitive difference, the cause of the cognitive difference and the shadow of the cognitive difference in the foreign policy-making In this paper, the cognitive differences in the EU's decision-making in China are further discussed in a more systematic way. The EU's decision-making body to China includes both the official and non-official levels, the official level of which includes the three EU institutions and the government of the member States, while the unofficial level includes think tanks, the media and the ordinary people The differences between the EU and China show that the differences between the EU and China are different, and the other is the difference between the EU and China. The EU's cognitive differences with China are related to areas of political, cultural, economic and diplomatic and security. There are three different conditions in the EU's cognitive differences with China, and the impact of each situation is different In the same way, the factors of the EU's cognitive difference to China include the cognitive subject, the cognitive object, the cognitive context and the information transfer. On the other hand, in the political field, the internal cognition of the EU is more consistent, the cognitive difference between Central and Central Europe is sharp and even the opposite, the conflict of the core values and the challenge to the interests of the core countries have become the main differences in this field For the reason, the inter-body cognitive difference in this field has a negative, long-term and difficult to reconcile with China-EU relations In the field of culture, the cognition of the EU is more consistent, the cognitive difference between China and the EU is clear, the difference between the cultural background and the historical development process is the main reason for the difference in this field, and the inter-body cognitive difference in this field is the result of the relationship between the two countries A negative, indirectness, and incongruity. In the economic and trade field, there are some cognitive differences among the decision-making bodies within the EU. There is a certain difference between the central and the EU, but through dialogue and consultation, the difference of the game and the measure of the economic interests is the main difference in this field. For reasons, the cognitive differences in this area have a short, non-serious, and adjustable negative impact on the relationship between China and China In the field of diplomacy and security, there is a certain cognitive difference between the various decision-making bodies in the EU, and there is a certain difference between the central and the EU, but the conflict between the game and the value of interests can be closed through dialogue and consultation, and the conflict between the interests is the main form of the difference in this field. For the reason, the cognitive differences in this field have a short, controllable and adjustable negative impact on the relationship between China and China and sex. In the coming period, the four factors that produce the main body-to-body cognitive difference will be sent There are some changes. In the case of China, China should look at this issue in a rational and dispassionate manner in response to the differences between the main subjects in the EU's decision-making in China, and recognize the wide, long-term and complex nature of the problem, and formulate specific countermeasures In order to deal with it, the conclusion of this paper is concluded after the detailed analysis is carried out: the main body-to-body cognitive difference in the EU's decision-making in China is the relation between China and China The effect of China-EU relations is not only influenced by the cognitive differences between Central and Central Europe, but also between the internal decision-making bodies of the European Union. The effect of the cognitive difference is that the influence of the EU's decision-making mechanism, the influence of the EU's internal decision-making body on the relationship between the EU and the EU has two sides: on the one hand, when the Central and Central Europe is in friction with such problems, the differences in the EU's cognition can prevent Central Europe from asking this question. On the other hand, when Central Europe needs to develop further on such issues, the differences in the European Union's cognitive differences will prevent Central Europe from this type of question
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華東師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：博士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：D85;D822.35
[Abstract]:In recent years, the inter-subjectivity in the EU's decision-making in China has become more and more prominent, and the impact on China-EU relations has become more and more obvious. Based on this, this paper, based on the cognitive differences in foreign policy-making, discusses the impact of the EU-China's cognitive differences on China-EU relations in the decision-making of China. The "inter-body cognitive difference" contains both "The cognitive difference between the decision-making bodies within the EU" and "Cognitive Differences between the EU and China (Government)". This paper divides the "cognitive difference" into four areas: politics, culture, economy and diplomacy and security. In this paper, the problems of the three or four main subjects in various fields are listed, and the characteristics of each field are summarized from the "Cognitive Differences in the EU", the "The Cognitive Differences between the EU and China", the "The main causes of the formation of cognitive difference" and the "The impact on the relations between China and Europe" by using the summary induction method. On this basis, the effect of different types of inter-body cognitive differences on China-EU relations is summarized. In this paper, the cognitive difference in foreign decision-making is deduced from the theory In the foreign policy-making, the target of the cognitive subject, the range of the cognitive object, the expression of the cognitive difference, the cause of the cognitive difference and the shadow of the cognitive difference in the foreign policy-making In this paper, the cognitive differences in the EU's decision-making in China are further discussed in a more systematic way. The EU's decision-making body to China includes both the official and non-official levels, the official level of which includes the three EU institutions and the government of the member States, while the unofficial level includes think tanks, the media and the ordinary people The differences between the EU and China show that the differences between the EU and China are different, and the other is the difference between the EU and China. The EU's cognitive differences with China are related to areas of political, cultural, economic and diplomatic and security. There are three different conditions in the EU's cognitive differences with China, and the impact of each situation is different In the same way, the factors of the EU's cognitive difference to China include the cognitive subject, the cognitive object, the cognitive context and the information transfer. On the other hand, in the political field, the internal cognition of the EU is more consistent, the cognitive difference between Central and Central Europe is sharp and even the opposite, the conflict of the core values and the challenge to the interests of the core countries have become the main differences in this field For the reason, the inter-body cognitive difference in this field has a negative, long-term and difficult to reconcile with China-EU relations In the field of culture, the cognition of the EU is more consistent, the cognitive difference between China and the EU is clear, the difference between the cultural background and the historical development process is the main reason for the difference in this field, and the inter-body cognitive difference in this field is the result of the relationship between the two countries A negative, indirectness, and incongruity. In the economic and trade field, there are some cognitive differences among the decision-making bodies within the EU. There is a certain difference between the central and the EU, but through dialogue and consultation, the difference of the game and the measure of the economic interests is the main difference in this field. For reasons, the cognitive differences in this area have a short, non-serious, and adjustable negative impact on the relationship between China and China In the field of diplomacy and security, there is a certain cognitive difference between the various decision-making bodies in the EU, and there is a certain difference between the central and the EU, but the conflict between the game and the value of interests can be closed through dialogue and consultation, and the conflict between the interests is the main form of the difference in this field. For the reason, the cognitive differences in this field have a short, controllable and adjustable negative impact on the relationship between China and China and sex. In the coming period, the four factors that produce the main body-to-body cognitive difference will be sent There are some changes. In the case of China, China should look at this issue in a rational and dispassionate manner in response to the differences between the main subjects in the EU's decision-making in China, and recognize the wide, long-term and complex nature of the problem, and formulate specific countermeasures In order to deal with it, the conclusion of this paper is concluded after the detailed analysis is carried out: the main body-to-body cognitive difference in the EU's decision-making in China is the relation between China and China The effect of China-EU relations is not only influenced by the cognitive differences between Central and Central Europe, but also between the internal decision-making bodies of the European Union. The effect of the cognitive difference is that the influence of the EU's decision-making mechanism, the influence of the EU's internal decision-making body on the relationship between the EU and the EU has two sides: on the one hand, when the Central and Central Europe is in friction with such problems, the differences in the EU's cognition can prevent Central Europe from asking this question. On the other hand, when Central Europe needs to develop further on such issues, the differences in the European Union's cognitive differences will prevent Central Europe from this type of question
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華東師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：博士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：D85;D822.35
【相似文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 陳建榮;結(jié)構(gòu)與單元——美國對華決策的系統(tǒng)分析[J];東南亞研究;2004年06期
2 柯布爾;;美對華決策的矛盾歷史[J];環(huán)球人物;2006年19期
3 熊婕;;性別鑒定與選擇性引流產(chǎn)的兩性認(rèn)知差異[J];法制與社會;2006年23期
4 王燕;;歐洲思想庫在歐盟對華決策中的地位和作用[J];歐洲研究;2009年02期
5 邱偉;美國思想庫在對華決策中的角色透視[J];學(xué)習(xí)月刊;2003年12期
6 何德功;影響日本對華決策的四大因素[J];w，
本文編號：2512573
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/shekelunwen/waijiao/2512573.html
最近更新
教材專著
