東北亞安全模式轉(zhuǎn)型——從雙邊同盟到多邊外交
發(fā)布時(shí)間：2019-06-06 16:59
【摘要】： 現(xiàn)實(shí)主義理論認(rèn)為國際體系是一個(gè)自助體系。在這樣的體系中,各國通過正式或非正式的契約進(jìn)行軍事合作以增進(jìn)它們的安全,防范潛在威脅,這樣便產(chǎn)生了同盟。安全模式是指行為體(主要指國家或政府組織)長期遵循的安全行為方式。同盟安全模式就是行為體通過創(chuàng)建、維持同盟而實(shí)現(xiàn)安全的安全行為方式。除了同盟安全模式外,國際政治領(lǐng)域還有:霸權(quán)安全模式、均勢安全模式、集體安全模式、多邊合作安全模式和多邊外交安全模式等安全模式。體系內(nèi)主導(dǎo)安全模式與非主導(dǎo)安全模式的地位是可以轉(zhuǎn)換的。安全模式轉(zhuǎn)型實(shí)際上是新安全模式影響力相對(duì)上升,舊安全模式影響力相對(duì)下降并直至被取代或同化的過程,是在體系戰(zhàn)略安全環(huán)境改變前提下,權(quán)力轉(zhuǎn)移、安全問題轉(zhuǎn)移共同作用的結(jié)果。 東北亞地區(qū)當(dāng)前主要存在雙邊同盟安全模式和多邊外交安全模式這兩種安全模式。以美日、美韓同盟為基礎(chǔ)的雙邊同盟安全模式產(chǎn)生于冷戰(zhàn)時(shí)期,長期以來是東北亞地區(qū)的主導(dǎo)安全模式。作為冷戰(zhàn)的遺跡,雙邊同盟安全模式已越來越不能適應(yīng)冷戰(zhàn)后東北亞不斷發(fā)展變化的戰(zhàn)略安全環(huán)境,在傳統(tǒng)安全及非傳統(tǒng)安全領(lǐng)域呈現(xiàn)出種種弊端。在解決朝核問題中誕生的六方會(huì)談機(jī)制是東北亞多邊外交安全模式的代表。從六方會(huì)談機(jī)制產(chǎn)生之日起,東北亞安全模式已經(jīng)開始了由雙邊同盟到多邊外交轉(zhuǎn)型的進(jìn)程并呈現(xiàn)出一種必然趨勢。 冷戰(zhàn)結(jié)束以來,在三個(gè)核心因素:權(quán)力分配變化、經(jīng)濟(jì)相互信賴加深、非傳統(tǒng)安全問題增多的共同作用下,東北亞地區(qū)的戰(zhàn)略安全環(huán)境發(fā)生了深刻變化,為安全模式從雙邊同盟到多邊外交轉(zhuǎn)型創(chuàng)造了前提條件。東北亞安全模式轉(zhuǎn)型的內(nèi)在機(jī)制是:引起地區(qū)戰(zhàn)略安全環(huán)境改變的三個(gè)核心因素,共同引起東北亞地區(qū)的權(quán)力轉(zhuǎn)移和安全問題轉(zhuǎn)移,進(jìn)而引起安全模式由雙邊同盟向多邊外交轉(zhuǎn)型。從第一次朝核危機(jī)開始,東北亞地區(qū)已經(jīng)出現(xiàn)一系列具有多邊外交安全模式特點(diǎn)的安全機(jī)制,如四方會(huì)談機(jī)制、日、韓、美3邊協(xié)調(diào)與監(jiān)督機(jī)制(TCOG)及后來的三方會(huì)談、六方會(huì)談機(jī)制。六方會(huì)談機(jī)制在第二次朝核危機(jī)中發(fā)揮了積極的作用,成為各方所認(rèn)可的、解決朝核問題的正式多邊外交機(jī)制。 東北亞地區(qū)不僅存在朝核問題,還存在眾多其他安全問題,諸如邊界爭端、能源安全、金融安全等問題。這些安全問題既涉及傳統(tǒng)安全又涉及非傳統(tǒng)安全,單憑六方會(huì)談機(jī)制難以解決所有問題。所以,推動(dòng)?xùn)|北亞安全模式轉(zhuǎn)型最切實(shí)可行的路徑是:在完善六方會(huì)談機(jī)制的基礎(chǔ)上,將其功能從傳統(tǒng)安全領(lǐng)域向非傳統(tǒng)安全領(lǐng)域擴(kuò)展,使其成為一個(gè)能夠解決東北亞所有安全問題的多邊外交安全體系。 東北亞安全模式轉(zhuǎn)型是一個(gè)長期、漸進(jìn)、曲折的過程,但卻是一種必然趨勢。中國要成為這一趨勢堅(jiān)定不移的推動(dòng)者,通過處理好各種關(guān)系,實(shí)現(xiàn)中國和平崛起與東北亞安全模式轉(zhuǎn)型的良性互動(dòng)。
[Abstract]:The realism theory holds that the international system is a self-service system. In such a system, States have generated alliances by conducting military cooperation through formal or informal contracts to enhance their security and to guard against potential threats. The security model refers to the manner in which the behavior body (mainly refers to the state or government organization) has long-term follow-up. The security model of the alliance is the safe behavior way of the behavior body to realize the security by creating and maintaining the alliance. In addition to the alliance security model, there are security models such as the hegemonic security model, the balance-potential security model, the collective security model, the multilateral cooperation security model and the multilateral diplomacy security model. The status of the dominant security mode and the non-dominant security mode in the system is convertible. The transformation of the security model is actually the relative rise of the influence of the new security model, the influence of the old security model is relatively lowered and the process of being replaced or assimilated is the result of the common effect of the transfer of power and the transfer of the safety problem on the premise of the change of the security environment of the system. There are two security modes of the bilateral alliance and the multilateral diplomacy security model in the Northeast Asia. The security model of the bilateral alliance based on the United States of America and the United States and Korea has long been the leading one in the Northeast Asia during the cold war. As the remains of the cold war, the security model of the two-sided alliance has become more and more difficult to adapt to the strategic security environment of the ever-changing development of the Northeast Asia after the cold war, and in the fields of traditional security and non-traditional security The mechanism of the six-party talks, which is born in the nuclear issue, is the multilateral diplomacy security model in North-East Asia. From the date of the six-party talks, the security model in North-East Asia has begun the process of transforming from a bilateral alliance to a multilateral diplomatic transition and presents a way The strategic security environment in the Northeast Asia has three core factors since the end of the cold war: the change of power distribution, the deepening of mutual trust between the economy and the increase of non-traditional security. A profound change in the security model from the bilateral to the multilateral diplomatic transition The internal mechanism of the transformation of the security model in North-East Asia is the three core factors that cause the change of the security environment of the regional strategy, which causes the transfer of the power and the security of the Northeast Asia, and then the security model is caused by the bilateral alliance. A series of security mechanisms, such as the Quartet, Japan, South Korea, the United States, the United States, the Coordination and Oversight Mechanism (TCOG) and the subsequent three-party talks, have emerged from the first nuclear crisis in North-East Asia. The mechanism of the Six-Party Talks has played a positive role in the second nuclear crisis, and has become an accepted solution to the nuclear issue. There are many other security issues, such as border dispute, energy, The issues of source security, financial security, etc. These security issues concern both traditional security and non-traditional security, with a single-party basis On the basis of improving the mechanism of the Six-Party Talks, it extends its function from the traditional security field to the non-traditional security field, making it a problem that can solve all the security of Northeast Asia The transition of the security model in North-East Asia is a long-term, gradual, It is an inevitable trend, but it is an inevitable trend. China will become a driver of this trend, and achieve the rise of China's peace through the process of all kinds of relations
【學(xué)位授予單位】：上海師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2010
【分類號(hào)】：D831
本文編號(hào)：2494457
[Abstract]:The realism theory holds that the international system is a self-service system. In such a system, States have generated alliances by conducting military cooperation through formal or informal contracts to enhance their security and to guard against potential threats. The security model refers to the manner in which the behavior body (mainly refers to the state or government organization) has long-term follow-up. The security model of the alliance is the safe behavior way of the behavior body to realize the security by creating and maintaining the alliance. In addition to the alliance security model, there are security models such as the hegemonic security model, the balance-potential security model, the collective security model, the multilateral cooperation security model and the multilateral diplomacy security model. The status of the dominant security mode and the non-dominant security mode in the system is convertible. The transformation of the security model is actually the relative rise of the influence of the new security model, the influence of the old security model is relatively lowered and the process of being replaced or assimilated is the result of the common effect of the transfer of power and the transfer of the safety problem on the premise of the change of the security environment of the system. There are two security modes of the bilateral alliance and the multilateral diplomacy security model in the Northeast Asia. The security model of the bilateral alliance based on the United States of America and the United States and Korea has long been the leading one in the Northeast Asia during the cold war. As the remains of the cold war, the security model of the two-sided alliance has become more and more difficult to adapt to the strategic security environment of the ever-changing development of the Northeast Asia after the cold war, and in the fields of traditional security and non-traditional security The mechanism of the six-party talks, which is born in the nuclear issue, is the multilateral diplomacy security model in North-East Asia. From the date of the six-party talks, the security model in North-East Asia has begun the process of transforming from a bilateral alliance to a multilateral diplomatic transition and presents a way The strategic security environment in the Northeast Asia has three core factors since the end of the cold war: the change of power distribution, the deepening of mutual trust between the economy and the increase of non-traditional security. A profound change in the security model from the bilateral to the multilateral diplomatic transition The internal mechanism of the transformation of the security model in North-East Asia is the three core factors that cause the change of the security environment of the regional strategy, which causes the transfer of the power and the security of the Northeast Asia, and then the security model is caused by the bilateral alliance. A series of security mechanisms, such as the Quartet, Japan, South Korea, the United States, the United States, the Coordination and Oversight Mechanism (TCOG) and the subsequent three-party talks, have emerged from the first nuclear crisis in North-East Asia. The mechanism of the Six-Party Talks has played a positive role in the second nuclear crisis, and has become an accepted solution to the nuclear issue. There are many other security issues, such as border dispute, energy, The issues of source security, financial security, etc. These security issues concern both traditional security and non-traditional security, with a single-party basis On the basis of improving the mechanism of the Six-Party Talks, it extends its function from the traditional security field to the non-traditional security field, making it a problem that can solve all the security of Northeast Asia The transition of the security model in North-East Asia is a long-term, gradual, It is an inevitable trend, but it is an inevitable trend. China will become a driver of this trend, and achieve the rise of China's peace through the process of all kinds of relations
【學(xué)位授予單位】：上海師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2010
【分類號(hào)】：D831
【引證文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條
1 周遠(yuǎn);美日韓三角關(guān)系對(duì)東北亞安全機(jī)制構(gòu)建的影響及我國的對(duì)策研究[D];山東建筑大學(xué);2012年
2 萬秋波;論冷戰(zhàn)后東亞安全機(jī)制[D];上海師范大學(xué);2012年
，本文編號(hào)：2494457
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/shekelunwen/waijiao/2494457.html
最近更新
教材專著
