【摘要】：隨著中國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)的快速發(fā)展，中國(guó)的國(guó)際地位日益上升，在國(guó)際社會(huì)上扮演著越來(lái)越重要的角色。雖然中美是處于同一個(gè)國(guó)際體系下，并且這個(gè)體系是由美國(guó)主導(dǎo)的，由于種種因素，中國(guó)和美國(guó)對(duì)于國(guó)際秩序如何變革存在諸多分歧。美國(guó)面對(duì)中國(guó)的崛起，其態(tài)度是謹(jǐn)慎并警惕的。“中國(guó)責(zé)任論”應(yīng)運(yùn)而生。 2005年，美國(guó)副國(guó)務(wù)卿佐利克在美中關(guān)系全國(guó)委員會(huì)的演講中提出，中國(guó)應(yīng)成為國(guó)際體系中“負(fù)責(zé)任的利益有關(guān)方”。2008年，彼得森國(guó)際經(jīng)濟(jì)研究所所長(zhǎng)弗雷德伯格斯滕“G2”概念得到了廣泛的關(guān)注，由此“中美共治”理念上升到理論高度。2009年9月,在華盛頓演講時(shí)，美國(guó)副國(guó)務(wù)卿斯坦伯格首倡中美“戰(zhàn)略再保證”,強(qiáng)調(diào)中國(guó)應(yīng)保證發(fā)展和壯大不以他國(guó)的安全和幸福為代價(jià)，建立中美間的合作信任。 中國(guó)應(yīng)該正面去回應(yīng)“中國(guó)責(zé)任論”的輿論，在國(guó)際社會(huì)中積極的建立一種大國(guó)形象。同時(shí)，中美關(guān)系對(duì)于現(xiàn)有的國(guó)際體系穩(wěn)定有著非常重要的影響，中國(guó)應(yīng)該看清美國(guó)提出“責(zé)任論”的根本目的，采取正確的態(tài)度和應(yīng)對(duì)措施。中國(guó)應(yīng)負(fù)起與自身國(guó)際地位，獲得的國(guó)際權(quán)利相符合的國(guó)際責(zé)任。這是一個(gè)不容忽視的問(wèn)題，因?yàn)樗绊懼袊?guó)的國(guó)際形象，這也是中國(guó)軟實(shí)力的一種重要體現(xiàn)。 本論文從“中國(guó)責(zé)任論”出臺(tái)大背景入手，具體介紹了“中國(guó)責(zé)任論”的內(nèi)容，從大環(huán)境來(lái)分析“中國(guó)責(zé)任論”的深層含義。同時(shí)，，從中美兩國(guó)的角度各自分析闡述了兩國(guó)對(duì)于“中國(guó)責(zé)任論”的看法和態(tài)度。從而，最后得出中國(guó)應(yīng)該充分利用“中國(guó)責(zé)任論”的這個(gè)契機(jī)，增強(qiáng)中國(guó)在國(guó)際社會(huì)的話語(yǔ)權(quán)，提高中國(guó)的軟實(shí)力。
[Abstract]:With the rapid development of China's economy, China's international status is rising day by day, playing a more and more important role in the international community. Although China and the United States are under the same international system, and the system is dominated by the United States, due to various factors, China and the United States have many differences on how to change the international order. In the face of the rise of China, the United States is cautious and vigilant. China's responsibility theory emerges as the times require. In 2005, U.S. Deputy Secretary of State Zoellick proposed in a speech to the National Committee for U.S.-China Relations that China should become a "responsible stakeholder" in the international system. The concept of "G2" by Fred Bergstein, director of the Peterson Institute for International Economics, has received extensive attention, thus raising the concept of "Sino-American co-governance" to a theoretical height. In September 2009, in a speech in Washington, D.C., American Deputy Secretary of State Steinberg initiated the "strategic reassurance" between China and the United States, stressing that China should ensure that China should not build up cooperation and trust between China and the United States at the expense of the security and well-being of other countries. China should respond positively to the public opinion of "China's responsibility" and actively establish a great power image in the international community. At the same time, Sino-US relations have a very important impact on the stability of the existing international system. China should see clearly the fundamental purpose of the "responsibility theory" put forward by the United States and take correct attitude and countermeasures. China should assume international responsibility in conformity with its international status and acquired international rights. This is a problem that can not be ignored, because it affects China's international image, which is also an important embodiment of China's soft power. This paper starts with the background of "China's responsibility theory", introduces the content of "China's responsibility theory", and analyzes the deep meaning of "China's responsibility theory" from the general environment. At the same time, from the point of view of China and the United States, this paper expounds the views and attitudes of the two countries to China's responsibility theory. Finally, it is concluded that China should make full use of this opportunity of "China's responsibility theory" to enhance China's voice in the international community and improve China's soft power.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：遼寧大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號(hào)】：D820

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 謝莉嬌;唐彥林;;美國(guó)的“中國(guó)責(zé)任論”與中美關(guān)系[J];長(zhǎng)春師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2006年07期

2 呂曉莉;;“中國(guó)責(zé)任論”語(yǔ)境下“負(fù)責(zé)任大國(guó)”外交理念淺析[J];當(dāng)代世界與社會(huì)主義;2009年04期

3 梁亞濱;;從利益攸關(guān)方到戰(zhàn)略再保證:霸權(quán)衰落下的中美關(guān)系[J];當(dāng)代亞太;2010年03期

4 趙青海;;“中國(guó)責(zé)任論”辨析[J];對(duì)外大傳播;2007年04期

5 潘忠岐;;冷戰(zhàn)后美國(guó)大戰(zhàn)略的理論思辨[J];國(guó)際觀察;2006年01期

6 張宇燕;高程;;基于利益最大化的美國(guó)行為[J];國(guó)際經(jīng)濟(jì)評(píng)論;2007年05期

7 馬振崗;;中國(guó)的責(zé)任與“中國(guó)責(zé)任論”[J];國(guó)際問(wèn)題研究;2007年03期

8 甘均先;;“中國(guó)責(zé)任論”解讀與中國(guó)外交應(yīng)對(duì)[J];國(guó)際展望;2010年04期

9 郭保福;;國(guó)際權(quán)力結(jié)構(gòu)性變化與中國(guó)的全球性責(zé)任[J];今日南國(guó)(中旬刊);2010年10期

10 袁鵬;“中國(guó)威脅”與中美合作[J];w攣胖蕓

本文編號(hào)：2461355