【摘要】：中日兩國(guó)關(guān)于釣魚(yú)島的爭(zhēng)端由來(lái)已久,近年來(lái),日本頻頻在釣魚(yú)島問(wèn)題上向中國(guó)挑釁,釣魚(yú)島問(wèn)題更是成為影響中日關(guān)系的棘手問(wèn)題之一,2012年9月日本更是鬧出了買島的鬧劇,日本千方百計(jì)爭(zhēng)奪釣魚(yú)島,與釣魚(yú)島重要的戰(zhàn)略地位,豐富的資源等因素是離不丌的。 關(guān)于釣魚(yú)島的歸屬問(wèn)題,中日兩國(guó)各自提出了自己的證據(jù),包括地理、歷史、國(guó)際關(guān)系、國(guó)際法等各個(gè)方面,一般來(lái)說(shuō)和平解決領(lǐng)土爭(zhēng)端,往往采用政治或外交途徑,但是當(dāng)政治和外交途徑都無(wú)法解決時(shí),比較有效的方式就是提交國(guó)際法庭。如果提交國(guó)際法庭,探索釣魚(yú)島屬于中國(guó)的法律證據(jù)和法理依據(jù)無(wú)疑是非常必要的,尤其是利用國(guó)際法原則和規(guī)則,從中找出有利于中國(guó)的證據(jù)。要真正利用國(guó)際法來(lái)解決,必須搞清楚日方所依據(jù)的內(nèi)容,從中找出其破綻,或找出史加有力的證據(jù),趨利避害。 中日兩國(guó)關(guān)于釣魚(yú)島問(wèn)題,進(jìn)行過(guò)多回合的政治、經(jīng)濟(jì)和軍事交涉,但仍沒(méi)有得到解決。目前,國(guó)內(nèi)關(guān)于解決釣魚(yú)島問(wèn)題的論文和專著很多,但大都重復(fù)地論述原有的證據(jù),從困際司法方面,尤其是從國(guó)際法院曾經(jīng)解決過(guò)的領(lǐng)土爭(zhēng)端案例來(lái)分析釣魚(yú)島問(wèn)題的很少。因此,本文歸納整理國(guó)內(nèi)外中日雙方關(guān)于釣魚(yú)島問(wèn)題的證據(jù),通過(guò)國(guó)際法院判例中的領(lǐng)土解決模式分析中日雙方關(guān)于釣魚(yú)島問(wèn)題證據(jù)的可取性,找出解決釣魚(yú)島問(wèn)題的關(guān)鍵點(diǎn),以期為以后付諸國(guó)際法院解決釣魚(yú)島問(wèn)題提供良好借鑒。
[Abstract]:The dispute between China and Japan over the Diaoyu Islands has a long history. In recent years, Japan has frequently challenged China on the Diaoyu Islands issue, and the Diaoyu Islands issue has become one of the thorny problems affecting Sino-Japanese relations. In September 2012, Japan even made a farce about buying the islands. Japan tried every possible means to compete for the Diaoyu Islands, with the important strategic position of the Diaoyu Islands, rich resources and other factors are inseparable. On the issue of the ownership of the Diaoyu Islands, China and Japan have each presented their own evidence, including geography, history, international relations, international law, and other aspects. Generally speaking, the peaceful settlement of territorial disputes often adopts political or diplomatic channels. But when both political and diplomatic avenues cannot be resolved, the more effective way is to refer them to the International Tribunal. If submitted to the International Court of Justice, it is undoubtedly necessary to explore the legal evidence and legal basis of the Diaoyu Islands belonging to China, especially to use the principles and rules of international law to find evidence in favour of China. In order to use international law to solve the problem, it is necessary to find out the contents on which Japan is based, to find out its flaws, or to find out the strong evidence of Shiga, so as to seek advantages and avoid disadvantages. China and Japan have engaged in a number of rounds of political, economic and military negotiations on the Diaoyu Islands, but have not yet been resolved. At present, there are a lot of papers and monographs on solving the Diaoyu Island problem in China, but most of them have repeatedly discussed the original evidence, and few of them have analyzed the Diaoyu Islands problem from the aspects of the judicature, especially from the case of the territorial dispute settled by the International Court of Justice. Therefore, this paper summarizes and collates the evidence on Diaoyu Islands between China and Japan at home and abroad, analyzes the desirability of the evidence on Diaoyu Islands between China and Japan through the territorial settlement model in the jurisprudence of the International Court of Justice, and finds out the key points to solve the Diaoyu Islands problem. With a view to the future implementation of the International Court of Justice to solve the Diaoyu Islands to provide a good reference.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：青島大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號(hào)】：D815.3

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 游博;;透析中日油氣資源及東海大陸架劃分之爭(zhēng)問(wèn)題[J];長(zhǎng)白學(xué)刊;2006年01期

2 曲波;;有效控制原則在解決島嶼爭(zhēng)端中的適用[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);2010年01期

3 楊揚(yáng);;日美同盟的調(diào)整與中國(guó)外交的戰(zhàn)略選擇[J];國(guó)際關(guān)系學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2008年03期

4 張峧;;國(guó)際法視角下的釣魚(yú)島問(wèn)題研究[J];法制博覽(中旬刊);2013年02期

5 韓昭慶;;從甲午戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)前歐洲人所繪中國(guó)地圖看釣魚(yú)島列島的歷史[J];復(fù)旦學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2013年01期

6 劉江永;;安倍再度執(zhí)政后的中日關(guān)系展望[J];東北亞論壇;2013年02期

7 司徒尚紀(jì);關(guān)于釣魚(yú)島群島歷史地理的若干問(wèn)題[J];嶺南文史;1997年01期

8 武圣濤;;中國(guó)對(duì)釣魚(yú)島享有主權(quán)之歷史依據(jù)[J];內(nèi)蒙古電大學(xué)刊;2008年10期

9 丁志強(qiáng);;新現(xiàn)實(shí)主義視角下日本對(duì)華政策的演變[J];吉林省教育學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(下旬);2013年03期

10 余建斌;;解密中國(guó)海監(jiān)巡航執(zhí)法——記者隨海監(jiān)船巡航釣魚(yú)島海域[J];中國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)周刊;2013年09期

，

本文編號(hào)：2388682