【摘要】：近年來,北極成為國際熱點(diǎn)之一,國內(nèi)外學(xué)術(shù)界圍繞北極治理進(jìn)行了大量探索,提出種種方案,主要有"南極模式"、"制度綜合體模式"和"海洋法公約模式"等,但這些方案本身即存在問題,且面臨著實(shí)施層面的各種挑戰(zhàn)。北極治理的國際探討雖然沒有結(jié)論,但相關(guān)實(shí)踐已然向前邁進(jìn):以北極理事會(huì)為代表的區(qū)域性國際機(jī)制不斷強(qiáng)化;冰區(qū)航運(yùn)管理規(guī)則的制定取得突破性進(jìn)展;北冰洋核心區(qū)的漁業(yè)管理討論向國際社會(huì)開放。凡此種種表明,北極國家與其他重要利益相關(guān)體在很多領(lǐng)域存在著諸多共同利益,具體領(lǐng)域的治理可能優(yōu)于全面的綜合涵蓋,"領(lǐng)域化"比"區(qū)域化"更具可行性。
[Abstract]:In recent years, the Arctic has become one of the international hot spots. The academic circles at home and abroad have made a great deal of exploration around the governance of the Arctic, and put forward various schemes, such as "Antarctic Model", "Institutional Synthesis Model" and "Law of the Sea Convention Model", etc. But the solutions themselves are problematic and face implementation challenges. Although there is no conclusion in the international discussion of Arctic governance, the relevant practice has moved forward: the regional international mechanism represented by the Arctic Council has been strengthened, the rules of shipping management in ice regions have made a breakthrough; Discussions on fisheries management in the core area of the Arctic Ocean are open to the international community. All this suggests that Arctic countries and other important stakeholders share many common interests in many areas, that governance in specific areas may be better than comprehensive coverage, and that "domainization" is more feasible than "regionalization".
【作者單位】： 中國海洋大學(xué)法政學(xué)院;
【基金】：2014年度國家社科基金重點(diǎn)項(xiàng)目“北極治理與中國參與戰(zhàn)略研究”(項(xiàng)目批準(zhǔn)號(hào):14AGJ001)的階段性成果
【分類號(hào)】：D815
，

本文編號(hào)：2298464