【摘要】：權(quán)力應(yīng)何去何從？苦難輝煌的中國應(yīng)怎樣走向復(fù)興？權(quán)力集散觀如何建言中國外交戰(zhàn)略構(gòu)設(shè)？東亞地區(qū)秩序能否和平轉(zhuǎn)型？ 無政府狀態(tài)下的國際體系并非無序，，而是各權(quán)力主體在不同層級上發(fā)生集聚與散逸的循環(huán)性動(dòng)態(tài)演化。國際政治中的矛盾與沖突具體表現(xiàn)為國家內(nèi)部無準(zhǔn)則與外化伸展需求間的鴻溝，根本原因在于主體能力與觀念之間的斷裂與錯(cuò)位，直接原因在于體系內(nèi)部權(quán)力運(yùn)行進(jìn)程的失衡，這使得人類向往天下大同的理想日漸式微。 國際體系是中國參與世界互動(dòng)的現(xiàn)實(shí)環(huán)境，也是謀求國家利益的重要資源，其在宏觀層面呈現(xiàn)穩(wěn)定性、滯緩性；微觀層面呈現(xiàn)復(fù)雜性、易變性與流散性。東亞地區(qū)亂象繁迭，深藏矛盾之后的就是這樣一種機(jī)制：密切的國際聯(lián)系與權(quán)力的快速集散。在如此不確定的世界之中，傳統(tǒng)眼光已然失效，重新理解權(quán)力應(yīng)若看待一種“平等共同體”的平等有效性那樣，將所有參與主體重新置于流動(dòng)性的情境之中，并重新對之延展、補(bǔ)充與深化。 經(jīng)察析基本理論、經(jīng)驗(yàn)事實(shí)與外交戰(zhàn)略三類范疇，本文提出一種“權(quán)力集散”的新觀念，其主要是指一種國際體系權(quán)力主體間的連續(xù)互動(dòng)關(guān)系，一種集聚化與散逸化相合的權(quán)力發(fā)展態(tài)勢、一種各行為主體受環(huán)境影響與利益支配，通過外化整合后采取傾向性反饋行為的動(dòng)態(tài)過程。簡言之，權(quán)力集散觀念表明了國家間互動(dòng)關(guān)系的內(nèi)在規(guī)律，運(yùn)行態(tài)勢和行權(quán)界度。同時(shí)，權(quán)力集散具有周期性、動(dòng)態(tài)性與“國內(nèi)-國際相關(guān)”性等三個(gè)屬性標(biāo)準(zhǔn)，其本質(zhì)功能在于強(qiáng)化動(dòng)態(tài)治理、推進(jìn)社會變革、豐富外交戰(zhàn)略。在東亞及全球進(jìn)一步重塑“參與商議型”模式、打造“協(xié)約管控型”模式、強(qiáng)化“政治循環(huán)型”行動(dòng)、推進(jìn)“大眾代表型”行動(dòng)，是中國對外戰(zhàn)略構(gòu)建的新型路徑。權(quán)力集散觀念的學(xué)理任務(wù)在于豐富國際關(guān)系權(quán)力研究內(nèi)涵，而現(xiàn)實(shí)意義在于培植外交戰(zhàn)略構(gòu)建中均衡而理性之思維。
[Abstract]:Where should power go? How should China, with its suffering and splendor, move towards its renaissance? How to construct China's diplomatic Strategy from the View of centralization and Distribution of Power? Can East Asian order transform peacefully? In anarchy, the international system is not disordered, but the dynamic evolution of centralization and escape of various power subjects at different levels. The contradictions and conflicts in international politics are manifested in the gap between the non-standard and the outstretched demand within the country. The fundamental reason lies in the breakage and dislocation between the subject's ability and the concept, and the direct reason lies in the imbalance of the process of power operation within the system. This causes mankind to yearn for the world together ideal day by day decline. The international system is the realistic environment for China to participate in the world interaction, and is also an important resource for seeking national interests. It presents stability and retardation at the macro level and complexity, variability and dispersion at the micro level. East Asia is full of chaos, deep contradiction is the mechanism: close international relations and the rapid distribution of power. In such an uncertain world, the traditional vision has lapsed, and a new understanding of power should be the same as the equal effectiveness of an "equal community" by replacing all participants in the context of mobility and extending it again. Supplement and deepen. Based on the analysis of three categories of basic theory, empirical facts and diplomatic strategy, this paper puts forward a new concept of "power collection and distribution", which mainly refers to the continuous interaction between the power subjects of an international system. It is a kind of power development trend which is consistent with agglomeration and escape. It is a dynamic process in which all actors are controlled by environment and interests and adopt tendentious feedback behavior after externalization and integration. In short, the concept of power distribution shows the inherent law, operation situation and the degree of exercise of power. At the same time, the distribution of power has three attribute standards: periodicity, dynamic and "domestic and international correlation". Its essential function is to strengthen dynamic governance, promote social change and enrich diplomatic strategy. It is a new way of China's foreign strategic construction to further reshape the model of "participation and negotiation", to build "compact control", to strengthen "political cycle" and to push forward "mass representative" in East Asia and the world. The theoretical task of the concept of power distribution is to enrich the connotation of power research in international relations, while the practical significance lies in cultivating a balanced and rational thinking in the construction of diplomatic strategy.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：遼寧大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D831

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 孫學(xué)峰;黃宇興;;中國崛起與東亞地區(qū)秩序演變[J];當(dāng)代亞太;2011年01期

2 王蓉;略論利益多元格局下的權(quán)力走向——權(quán)力的交疊和分散[J];法學(xué)評論;2003年05期

3 讓-帕斯卡爾·達(dá)洛茲;李存娜;;政治代表如何贏得合法性:一種符號學(xué)研究方法[J];國際社會科學(xué)雜志(中文版);2010年03期

4 周方銀;;朝貢體制的均衡分析[J];國際政治科學(xué);2011年01期

5 布蘭德利·沃馬克;溫衛(wèi)杰;萬鵬;;非對稱性與中國的朝貢體系[J];國際政治科學(xué);2013年01期

6 張勇進(jìn);巴里·布贊;;作為國際社會的朝貢體系[J];國際政治科學(xué);2012年03期

7 周方銀;;中美新型大國關(guān)系的動(dòng)力、路徑與前景[J];當(dāng)代亞太;2013年02期

8 蘇長和;;國內(nèi)—國際互動(dòng)與中國對外關(guān)系展開[J];教學(xué)與研究;2009年10期

9 林丹青;;道德問題和政治問題的解答有何關(guān)系——評《商談道德與商議民主——哈貝馬斯的政治倫理思想研究》[J];華中科技大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會科學(xué)版);2012年05期

10 李淑云;;信任機(jī)制:構(gòu)建東北亞區(qū)域安全的保障[J];世界經(jīng)濟(jì)與政治;2007年02期

本文編號：2277535