論《南海各方行為宣言》的進(jìn)展與困境
[Abstract]:One of the important principles in China's international strategy after the Cold War is "standing in the Asia-Pacific region and stabilizing the periphery." the Declaration on the Conduct of parties in the South China Sea signed by China and ASEAN in 2002 can be regarded as a milestone in China's policy on the South China Sea. On the basis of the South China Sea Declaration, China and Southeast Asian countries have conducted consultations and cooperation in various fields, including politics, security, and economy. As an oriental initiative, joint development is considered to be the most practical and feasible way to solve the complex sea area disputes and bring economic benefits to the countries concerned. The agreement on joint development and cooperation between China and the Philippines, as well as between China and Vietnam, and the Philippines, is an effective attempt to "shelve disputes and jointly develop" in resolving disputes over sovereignty and maritime rights and interests in the South China Sea. However, in recent years, the joint development of the South China Sea has been difficult, slow progress, has not really achieved, or even repeated, some South China Sea related countries have taken measures to change the status quo. In addition, the issue of the South China Sea is also related to the energy security strategy and even the national security strategy of the United States and Japan. The international factors outside the region are in their own interests to contain China and support the relevant countries in the South China Sea. The existence of international factors is also an important reason why the Declaration of the behaviors of parties in the South China Sea is facing difficulties. On this basis, this paper points out that there are in fact more disadvantages than advantages in the Declaration on the Conduct of parties in the South China Sea, and suggests that it should be replaced by a document with clearer provisions and higher legal effect. At the same time, certain punitive measures should be taken against unilateral acts.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:外交學(xué)院
【學(xué)位級別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2010
【分類號】:D822.3
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 陸儒德;;“無瑕”風(fēng)波 中國理性維權(quán)[J];東北之窗;2009年08期
2 王傳軍;區(qū)外大國對南海地區(qū)的滲透及其影響[J];當(dāng)代亞太;2001年11期
3 李金明;從東盟南海宣言到南海各方行為宣言[J];東南亞;2004年03期
4 張明亮;;“9·11”以來南中國海形勢綜述[J];東南亞研究;2006年03期
5 宋燕輝;;近期南海情勢發(fā)展之觀察與分析[J];東南亞研究;2008年01期
6 張文彬;;中國及有關(guān)國家關(guān)于南沙群島歸屬的法理根據(jù)之比較研究[J];法學(xué)家;1996年02期
7 檀有志;;南海問題風(fēng)波再起的背景[J];國際資料信息;2009年06期
8 王翔宇,黎文龍;析南海問題中的美國因素[J];貴州師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2001年03期
9 駱莉,袁術(shù)林;中國國家安全中的南海問題初探[J];暨南學(xué)報(人文科學(xué)與社會科學(xué)版);2005年01期
10 趙建文;聯(lián)合國海洋法公約與中國在南海的既得權(quán)利[J];法學(xué)研究;2003年02期
相關(guān)重要報紙文章 前3條
1 檀有志 對外經(jīng)濟(jì)貿(mào)易大學(xué)講師;[N];中國國防報;2009年
2 李金明;[N];中國能源報;2009年
3 新加坡東南亞研究所中國-東南亞關(guān)系專家 伊恩·斯多瑞 本報特約編譯 郭懿芝;[N];世界報;2009年
,本文編號:2277068
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/shekelunwen/waijiao/2277068.html