論東北亞區(qū)域合作與中韓日民族主義沖突關(guān)系
發(fā)布時間：2018-10-09 10:13
【摘要】：當(dāng)今世界全球化、區(qū)域一體化的趨勢日益明顯,東亞地區(qū)無論是從人口還是經(jīng)濟(jì)力在世界占有重要一席,備受世人關(guān)注,東亞各國也意識到區(qū)域一體化的重要性,緊跟世界發(fā)展趨勢,推進(jìn)實質(zhì)性研究,跨國交流日益活躍。但近幾年來,由于日本右翼勢力不斷觸動各國敏感的神經(jīng),區(qū)域內(nèi)的矛盾與沖突無法消停,相互合作也處于停滯狀態(tài),區(qū)域一體化的構(gòu)想更是失去了彈性。過去的合作關(guān)系瞬間轉(zhuǎn)變?yōu)楦偁幣c對峙的關(guān)系,東北亞各國又重新回到國家民族主義的框架內(nèi),形成了新的冷戰(zhàn)氣流。狹隘的民族主義成為了阻礙區(qū)域合作的最大障礙。西歐地區(qū)曾因民族主義引發(fā)了兩次世界大戰(zhàn),因此探討西歐地區(qū)的經(jīng)驗與教訓(xùn),對東北亞具有重大的借鑒意義。一味地批判民族主義并不是兩全之策,只有有效管理沖突,解決實際問題才是最具現(xiàn)實意義的。以客觀的眼光看待東北亞問題,為東北亞各國的民族主義注入理性的血液,提高區(qū)域認(rèn)同意識,維護(hù)世界和平,這才是東北亞各國的必由之路。本文將分五個章進(jìn)行敘述： 第一章為緒論部分,闡述本文的研究目的及意義、東北亞(中國、韓國、日本)及歐美學(xué)界的有關(guān)學(xué)術(shù)動態(tài)及現(xiàn)狀、研究方法、主要內(nèi)容,并說明研究地域范圍、區(qū)域主義相關(guān)用語。本文將東北亞局限于中國、韓國、日本三國,將使用中間概念-“區(qū)域合作”。 第二章主要分析區(qū)域主義理論、東北亞三國民族主義演變、沖突類型、東亞區(qū)域合作停滯與東北亞沖突。過去民族主義凝聚國民向心力,團(tuán)結(jié)人民群眾共同抵御外敵,爭取民族獨立與解放,但在全球化背景下狹隘的民族主義觀卻成為阻礙東北亞區(qū)域合作的最大障礙。 第三章闡述東北亞三國民族主義沖突類型。當(dāng)前的東北亞三國民族主義沖突可歸納為“存在論”、“歷史認(rèn)識”、“經(jīng)濟(jì)層面”、“政治方面”,將提出緩和沖突的方案。歐洲通過民族主義迎來了現(xiàn)代化,又因民族主義沖突經(jīng)歷了兩次世界大戰(zhàn),當(dāng)今的歐洲克服了民族主義,通過分析歐洲克服民族主義的過程及經(jīng)驗為東北亞三國提出和解、共榮的建議。 第四章闡述東北亞三國克服民族主義沖突的方法論與區(qū)域合作前景。過去以功能主義觀點思考東北亞問題,但目前該地區(qū)沖突不斷,功能主義理論已經(jīng)不能正確解答出現(xiàn)的新問題,新形勢,從后現(xiàn)代主義觀點出發(fā),以結(jié)構(gòu)主義理論論證當(dāng)前的民族主義沖突,并提出有效地對策。在推進(jìn)東北亞區(qū)域合作的進(jìn)程中應(yīng)堅持理性的愛國主義,排除域外勢力的介入,由本區(qū)域內(nèi)三國共同協(xié)商處理內(nèi)部事務(wù),通過對話解決國家之間的矛盾,加強文化交流,鞏固合作基礎(chǔ),積極培育區(qū)域認(rèn)同觀,構(gòu)建新的地區(qū)秩序。 第五章為結(jié)論,因東北亞各國長期處于民族國家的束縛中,應(yīng)向市民社會及周邊國家開放公共領(lǐng)域,能夠使東北亞各國居民暢所欲言,討論共同關(guān)心的問題,為此有必要改變根深蒂固的民族主義史觀,超越民族、國家的界限,在更廣泛的區(qū)域內(nèi)形成相互聯(lián)合,多民族、多元文化之間相互交叉與交流,從而形成區(qū)域認(rèn)同,超越區(qū)域聯(lián)合的開放性合作為目的,對社會的通俗文化與現(xiàn)狀進(jìn)行深刻的了解,并在此基礎(chǔ)上形成區(qū)域內(nèi)的文化共識,加強相互交往、學(xué)習(xí),共同探求東北亞認(rèn)知,并付諸實踐,構(gòu)建和平繁榮、穩(wěn)定的新東北亞,加快東北亞一體化進(jìn)程,為本地區(qū)及世界和平做貢獻(xiàn)。
[Abstract]:The trend of globalization and regional integration in the world is becoming more and more obvious. East Asian countries are also aware of the importance of regional integration, whether it is the population or economic force in the world, and the East Asian countries are aware of the importance of regional integration, follow the development trend of the world and advance substantive research. Cross-border exchanges are increasingly active. But in recent years, because the Japanese right-wing forces constantly touch sensitive nerves, the conflict and conflict in the region cannot be stopped, mutual cooperation is in stagnation, and the concept of regional integration has lost elasticity. In the past, the relationship of cooperation has been transformed into a relationship between competition and confrontation, and the Northeast Asian countries have returned to the national nationalism again, forming a new cold-war air flow. Narrow nationalism has become the biggest obstacle to regional cooperation. The western Europe region has caused two world wars with nationalism, thus exploring the experiences and lessons of West Europe region, which has great reference significance to Northeast Asia. To criticize nationalism blindly is not the best policy, only effective management conflict, solve the practical problem is the most practical significance. It is the only way for all countries in Northeast Asia to look at Northeast Asia with an objective view, inject rational blood into the nationalism of all countries in Northeast Asia, improve regional identity consciousness and safeguard world peace. This paper will describe five chapters: The first chapter is the introduction part, expounds the purpose and significance of this thesis, the relevant academic developments and present situation, research methods, main contents of Northeast Asia (China, Korea, Japan) and European and American academic circles, and explains the research area. range, regionalism In this article, North-East Asia is limited to China, Korea and Japan. k>. The second chapter mainly analyzes the regionalism theory, the nationalism evolution in Northeast Asia, the conflict type and the stagnation of regional cooperation in East Asia. in that context of globalization, the narrow nationalism has become an obstacle to the regional cooperation in Northeast Asia. The third chapter describes the three countries of Northeast Asia The type of nationalism conflict. The current nationalistic conflict in Northeast Asia can be summarized as 鈥渁theism鈥，
本文編號：2258962
[Abstract]:The trend of globalization and regional integration in the world is becoming more and more obvious. East Asian countries are also aware of the importance of regional integration, whether it is the population or economic force in the world, and the East Asian countries are aware of the importance of regional integration, follow the development trend of the world and advance substantive research. Cross-border exchanges are increasingly active. But in recent years, because the Japanese right-wing forces constantly touch sensitive nerves, the conflict and conflict in the region cannot be stopped, mutual cooperation is in stagnation, and the concept of regional integration has lost elasticity. In the past, the relationship of cooperation has been transformed into a relationship between competition and confrontation, and the Northeast Asian countries have returned to the national nationalism again, forming a new cold-war air flow. Narrow nationalism has become the biggest obstacle to regional cooperation. The western Europe region has caused two world wars with nationalism, thus exploring the experiences and lessons of West Europe region, which has great reference significance to Northeast Asia. To criticize nationalism blindly is not the best policy, only effective management conflict, solve the practical problem is the most practical significance. It is the only way for all countries in Northeast Asia to look at Northeast Asia with an objective view, inject rational blood into the nationalism of all countries in Northeast Asia, improve regional identity consciousness and safeguard world peace. This paper will describe five chapters: The first chapter is the introduction part, expounds the purpose and significance of this thesis, the relevant academic developments and present situation, research methods, main contents of Northeast Asia (China, Korea, Japan) and European and American academic circles, and explains the research area. range, regionalism In this article, North-East Asia is limited to China, Korea and Japan. k>. The second chapter mainly analyzes the regionalism theory, the nationalism evolution in Northeast Asia, the conflict type and the stagnation of regional cooperation in East Asia. in that context of globalization, the narrow nationalism has become an obstacle to the regional cooperation in Northeast Asia. The third chapter describes the three countries of Northeast Asia The type of nationalism conflict. The current nationalistic conflict in Northeast Asia can be summarized as 鈥渁theism鈥，
本文編號：2258962
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/shekelunwen/waijiao/2258962.html
最近更新
教材專著
