【摘要】：在全球化的浪潮下,中國通過改革開放獲得了經(jīng)濟上的快速發(fā)展,綜合國力不斷上升。這得益于中國把握了和平與發(fā)展的時代主題,積極創(chuàng)造和維護國內(nèi)外的穩(wěn)定環(huán)境。中國一直致力于營造和維護一種對中國國內(nèi)經(jīng)濟發(fā)展有利的環(huán)境。但這一努力并不簡單,相反,因為中國周邊環(huán)境的復(fù)雜性,導(dǎo)致這一努力耗費巨大。中國周邊環(huán)境的復(fù)雜性,既包括內(nèi)容的復(fù)雜性和解決的復(fù)雜性。內(nèi)容上,中國周邊主要包括：與一些周邊國家還存在領(lǐng)土、領(lǐng)海爭端；地區(qū)內(nèi)存在多個大國；地區(qū)傳統(tǒng)安全和非傳統(tǒng)安全問題并存等。問題解決上,因為這些問題產(chǎn)生的歷史因素和現(xiàn)實因素較為復(fù)雜,導(dǎo)致這些問題在短期內(nèi)都不能得到妥善解決。這讓我國需要花費大量的外交精力在周邊地區(qū)。這不僅制約著中國自身的經(jīng)濟發(fā)展,也制約著中國走向世界。讓中國周邊環(huán)境更加復(fù)雜還有一個非常重要的因素,那就是美國。冷戰(zhàn)后,美國成為全球唯一超級大國。為了鞏固其領(lǐng)導(dǎo)地位,美國在全球范圍內(nèi)制定了一整套戰(zhàn)略。在亞太地區(qū),中國一直是美國認定的主要對手。冷戰(zhàn)后美國歷屆政府都對亞太戰(zhàn)略進行了具體設(shè)計,圍堵中國一直是其戰(zhàn)略重點。尤其是奧巴馬政府上臺后,美國的全球戰(zhàn)略重點轉(zhuǎn)移到了亞太地區(qū),中國更是被其戰(zhàn)略重點關(guān)注。因為美國的參與,使原本復(fù)雜的地區(qū)問題進一步復(fù)雜化。美國直接或間接的參與和影響與我國的領(lǐng)土爭端問題,讓中國與他國的爭端問題形成僵持,也給中國的內(nèi)政問題(臺灣問題)制造困難。同時,地區(qū)傳統(tǒng)安全問題上,朝鮮半島問題,也是因為冷戰(zhàn)美國與蘇聯(lián)對抗形成的南北分裂局面,又因為美國支持韓國而使朝鮮對美國產(chǎn)生敵視,才使地區(qū)形勢不定期的緊張升級。最后,美國在地區(qū)的活動,讓中國在這一地區(qū)開展周邊外交的成效大打折扣。中國的實力增長讓周邊一些國家感到威脅,美國的活動讓這些國家傾向于引入這一域外大國作為他們與中國關(guān)系的籌碼。這樣中國就需要付出更多努力來經(jīng)營周邊才能得到更多成效。
[Abstract]:In the tide of globalization, China has achieved rapid economic development through reform and opening up, and the overall national strength has been rising. This is because China has grasped the theme of peace and development and actively created and maintained a stable environment at home and abroad. China has been working to create and maintain a favorable environment for China's domestic economic development. But this effort is not simple, on the contrary, because of the complexity of China's surrounding environment, it is costly. The complexity of China's surrounding environment includes both the complexity of the content and the complexity of the solution. In terms of content, China's periphery mainly includes: there are still territorial and territorial sea disputes with some neighboring countries; there are many big powers in the region; and the traditional and non-traditional security problems coexist in the region and so on. The problems can not be solved properly in the short term because of the complicated historical and realistic factors. This makes it necessary for our country to spend a great deal of diplomatic energy in the surrounding areas. This not only restricts China's own economic development, but also restricts China to the world. Another very important factor that complicates China's surroundings is the United States. After the cold war, the United States became the only superpower in the world. To consolidate its leadership, the United States has developed a global strategy. In the Asia-Pacific region, China has been a major rival to the United States. Since the Cold War, successive American governments have designed the Asia-Pacific strategy, and containment of China has always been its strategic focus. Especially after the Obama administration came to power, the global strategic focus of the United States shifted to the Asia-Pacific region, and China was also the focus of its strategy. Because of the participation of the United States, the original complex regional issues further complicated. The direct or indirect participation and influence of the United States in the territorial dispute with China makes the dispute between China and other countries a stalemate and makes it difficult for China's internal affairs (the Taiwan issue). At the same time, on the issue of traditional regional security, the Korean Peninsula issue is also due to the North-South split that resulted from the confrontation between the United States and the Soviet Union in the cold war, and North Korea's hostility to the United States because of its support for South Korea. It is only then that the tension in the region escalates from time to time. Finally, U.S. activities in the region have made China's peripheral diplomacy in the region less effective. China's growing power threatens neighboring countries, which tend to introduce the foreign power as a bargaining chip in their relations with China because of U.S. activity. In this way, China needs to pay more efforts to operate the surrounding areas to get more results.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：D871.2

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 梁寶衛(wèi);付紅紅;;美國奧巴馬政府東亞政策(2009～2010)評析[J];福建論壇(社科教育版);2011年02期

2 秦治來;;和諧周邊:中國周邊外交戰(zhàn)略新起點[J];國際關(guān)系學(xué)院學(xué)報;2010年06期

3 吳友富;陳默;;奧巴馬政府的巧實力戰(zhàn)略[J];國際觀察;2010年04期

4 朱聽昌;;中國地緣安全環(huán)境中的“安全困境”問題解析[J];國際展望;2012年03期

5 李恒陽;;奧巴馬第二任期美國外交政策走向析論[J];國際安全研究;2013年03期

6 楊毅;;美國亞太聯(lián)盟體系與中國周邊戰(zhàn)略[J];國際安全研究;2013年03期

7 李莉;;美國學(xué)界反思“亞太再平衡戰(zhàn)略”[J];當(dāng)代世界社會主義問題;2013年03期

8 李興;牛義臣;;上合組織為何不足以支撐中國西北周邊安全戰(zhàn)略[J];國際安全研究;2013年04期

9 錢文榮;;奧巴馬政府的全球戰(zhàn)略重心東移[J];和平與發(fā)展;2011年02期

10 杜丁丁;;美國以“巧實力”促東南亞戰(zhàn)略“重返”[J];當(dāng)代世界;2009年09期

相關(guān)重要報紙文章 前1條

1 中華人民共和國主席 習(xí)近平;[N];人民日報;2014年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前5條

1 王蘭;奧巴馬政府的東南亞政策解析[D];吉林大學(xué);2011年

2 羅月娥;美國全球戰(zhàn)略重心東移的地緣政治學(xué)分析[D];蘇州大學(xué);2012年

3 關(guān)東;美國對中國南海問題的介入及對策研究[D];沈陽師范大學(xué);2013年

4 劉慧;奧巴馬政府時期美國的亞太安全戰(zhàn)略研究[D];河北師范大學(xué);2013年

5 侯云哲;美國加入TPP對中國的影響及對策研究[D];河北大學(xué);2013年

，

本文編號：2189621