反恐審訊及口供的適用
發(fā)布時間:2018-07-22 10:44
【摘要】:在依法懲治暴力恐怖犯罪案件過程中,審訊的意義重大。鑒于暴力恐怖犯罪的特殊性,各國的立法和實踐認(rèn)可審訊嫌疑人時可采取諸多特別措施,包括一些有損人格、有害健康甚至是達(dá)到酷刑標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的手段,但從實踐看,并未達(dá)到預(yù)期效果。歷史和實踐證明,審訊中使用酷刑不僅增加反恐的道德成本,在訴訟上也難以奏效。在應(yīng)對暴力恐怖犯罪時,應(yīng)創(chuàng)設(shè)特殊的法律機(jī)制,適當(dāng)放寬審訊方法的限制,同時在口供的證明力評判和證據(jù)資格審查上設(shè)置特殊的證據(jù)法規(guī)則。
[Abstract]:In the process of punishing crimes of violence and terrorism according to law, the trial is of great significance. In view of the particularity of the crime of violent terrorism, the legislation and practice of States may adopt a number of special measures when approving the interrogation of suspects, including some means that are degrading to the personality, harmful to health or even meet the standards of torture, but from a practical point of view, Did not achieve the desired results. History and practice have proved that the use of torture in interrogation not only increases the moral cost of terrorism, but also fails in litigation. When dealing with violent terrorist crimes, special legal mechanism should be created, the restrictions of interrogation methods should be relaxed appropriately, and special rules of evidence law should be set up in the judgment of testifying power and the examination of evidence qualification.
【作者單位】: 西南政法大學(xué);
【基金】:重慶高校創(chuàng)新團(tuán)隊建設(shè)計劃資助項目(項目編號:KJTD201301) 重慶市社科規(guī)劃培育項目“恐怖主義犯罪立體化對策研究”(項目編號:2013PYPX13)的階段性成果
【分類號】:D815.5
本文編號:2137184
[Abstract]:In the process of punishing crimes of violence and terrorism according to law, the trial is of great significance. In view of the particularity of the crime of violent terrorism, the legislation and practice of States may adopt a number of special measures when approving the interrogation of suspects, including some means that are degrading to the personality, harmful to health or even meet the standards of torture, but from a practical point of view, Did not achieve the desired results. History and practice have proved that the use of torture in interrogation not only increases the moral cost of terrorism, but also fails in litigation. When dealing with violent terrorist crimes, special legal mechanism should be created, the restrictions of interrogation methods should be relaxed appropriately, and special rules of evidence law should be set up in the judgment of testifying power and the examination of evidence qualification.
【作者單位】: 西南政法大學(xué);
【基金】:重慶高校創(chuàng)新團(tuán)隊建設(shè)計劃資助項目(項目編號:KJTD201301) 重慶市社科規(guī)劃培育項目“恐怖主義犯罪立體化對策研究”(項目編號:2013PYPX13)的階段性成果
【分類號】:D815.5
【相似文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 石子堅;;文化差異與執(zhí)法差異[J];公安教育;2010年03期
2 ;刊物[J];中國新聞周刊;2000年04期
3 梁曉聲;關(guān)于《民選》[J];領(lǐng)導(dǎo)科學(xué);2002年04期
4 ;統(tǒng)戰(zhàn)資訊[J];四川統(tǒng)一戰(zhàn)線;2003年01期
5 馮亮;;“米蘭達(dá)忠告”的由來[J];人民之聲;2003年12期
6 ;人文薈萃[J];黨風(fēng)與廉政;2001年05期
7 陳敏;國際人權(quán)文書對警察行為的規(guī)定(上)[J];人民公安;2001年16期
8 ;傳媒備忘[J];百姓;2001年01期
9 湯勇仁;;解讀聯(lián)合國《警察人權(quán)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)與實踐》[J];公安研究;2009年03期
10 崔敏;英國的警察制度和刑事偵查程序[J];公安大學(xué)學(xué)報;1998年05期
相關(guān)重要報紙文章 前4條
1 馬震;卡拉季奇被捕,躲了13年終未逃此劫[N];新華每日電訊;2008年
2 江平;民為邦本,法治天下[N];中華讀書報;2009年
3 大學(xué)生 雷磊;行善做好事不該設(shè)“門檻”[N];新華每日電訊;2010年
4 本報記者 陳麗平;刑訴法修改草案有望年內(nèi)提請審議[N];法制日報;2011年
,本文編號:2137184
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/shekelunwen/waijiao/2137184.html
最近更新
教材專著