蘇聯(lián)解體以來俄羅斯對歐美力量東擴(kuò)的軍事回應(yīng)及策略
[Abstract]:After the end of the cold war, after the disintegration of the Soviet Eastern Group, the pro Soviet Russian regime in Eastern Europe went down and the Russian forces in Eastern Europe disappeared overnight and had a great influence on the Russian military strategy. At the same time, the European and American countries began to expand their forces in these areas, such as the eastern expansion of NATO and the accession of the Eastern European countries to the EU. And the United States also had troops in Central Asia and had military cooperation with other countries in the region. The eastern expansion of the United States and Europe made Russia feel a threat. The military response has become an important means for Russia to resist the eastward expansion of European and American forces.
In order to combat the eastern expansion of Europe and the United States, Russia has different military deployments in the Russian European region, the Caucasus and Central Asia, the three areas in contact with the European and American forces. In the Russian European part, Russia mainly responds to the Eastern European countries' accession to NATO. In the Caucasus, it is aimed at the Georgian and European and American Georgian. The corresponding military action occurred in the border dispute. In Central Asia, it was to cope with the European and American garrison in the region after the 911 incident.
In addition to deployment, Russia has carried out two practical military operations to expand the eastern expansion of the European and American forces. After the first NATO bombing of Yugoslavia in 1999, Russia, without prior notification of NATO, had sent troops to seize the airport in the capital of Kosovo, causing a confrontation between the Russian army and NATO. The second time was 2008. In the war of Georgia in the 1990s, the Russian army made a military strike against the pro European and American Georgian forces, which made Russia's relations with Europe and the United States, especially the United States very tense.
Russia is more strongly opposed to the United States' desire to deploy anti missile systems in Eastern Europe. Russia believes that the system will affect Russia's strategic nuclear strike on the United States, and the nuclear strike capability can be said to be the root of the Russian global strategy. In order to oppose the United States plan, Russia has done a lot of corresponding action, such as The deployment of ballistic missiles and threats to Poland in the enclave of Kaliningrad will be dealt with.
In the face of the eastern expansion of the European and American forces, Russia has also made a corresponding adjustment in the military development. Since Russia's economic downturn in 90s, Russia's military science and technology development needs to be adjusted to cope with the eastern expansion of the European and American forces. Russia has basically concentrated resources to develop the strategic nuclear force, such as priority. Developing strategic intercontinental ballistic missiles and so on. In strategic thinking, Russia made a strategic contraction around the world to concentrate on the local periphery to cope with the eastward expansion of the European and American forces. And Russia, in view of its own conventional forces, was less than NATO, so Russia has adjusted its use of nuclear weapons, reduced the use of the threshold, and paid more attention to the tactical nuclear. By reducing the principle of use of nuclear weapons, the Russian conventional forces can also use nuclear weapons to attack the enemy when they fail to retreat to the enemy in a local war. In addition, Russia also attaches importance to the regional alliance in the surrounding areas to consolidate the power of Russia in these areas.
In the twenty years of the founding of Russian Federation, Russia and Europe and the United States have undulated relations. The reason is that even Russia is basically inclined to cooperate with Europe and the United States, but there is a gap between the cognition and reality of its own sphere of influence, which makes Russia feel dissatisfied with the expansion of its forces in Europe and the United States. In accordance with the reality, the relationship between Russia and Europe and the United States will be in long-term cooperation.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:復(fù)旦大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2010
【分類號】:E512;D851.2
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 林治華;;“顏色革命”爆發(fā)的經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)分析——吉爾吉斯斯坦與烏茲別克斯坦轉(zhuǎn)軌經(jīng)濟(jì)比較[J];俄羅斯中亞東歐研究;2006年01期
2 張耀;;地緣政治的回歸與九一一事件后美俄關(guān)系的嬗變——以中亞為個(gè)案的分析[J];俄羅斯中亞東歐研究;2006年01期
3 張露;;地緣政治與美俄關(guān)系——從烏克蘭大選解讀冷戰(zhàn)后美俄關(guān)系中的地緣政治因素[J];俄羅斯中亞東歐研究;2006年01期
4 徐之明;王正泉;;中東歐國家加入歐盟對俄羅斯的不利影響[J];俄羅斯中亞東歐研究;2006年01期
5 龐大鵬;;俄羅斯外交戰(zhàn)略中的中東[J];俄羅斯中亞東歐研究;2006年01期
6 曾憲洪;;莫斯科如何應(yīng)對“顏色革命”的挑戰(zhàn)——克里姆林宮的“反革命”回應(yīng):依靠保守力量和民主雄辯術(shù)[J];俄羅斯中亞東歐研究;2006年01期
7 吳大輝;;美國在獨(dú)聯(lián)體地區(qū)策動“顏色革命”的三重訴求——兼論中俄在上海合作組織架構(gòu)下抵御“顏色革命”的當(dāng)務(wù)之急[J];俄羅斯中亞東歐研究;2006年02期
8 龐大鵬;;俄美關(guān)系中的車臣問題[J];俄羅斯中亞東歐研究;2006年02期
9 胡尚哲;高永久;;美國的中亞和外高加索戰(zhàn)略的演變[J];俄羅斯中亞東歐研究;2006年02期
10 李抒音;;外高加索形勢對俄羅斯安全環(huán)境影響分析[J];俄羅斯中亞東歐研究;2006年03期
,本文編號:2119681
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/shekelunwen/waijiao/2119681.html