本文選題：當代俄羅斯 + 外交學　； 參考：《外交學院》2011年博士論文

【摘要】：20世紀90年代初冷戰(zhàn)結(jié)束后,國際環(huán)境發(fā)生深刻變革并對現(xiàn)代外交實踐產(chǎn)生深遠影響。俄羅斯身處劇變中心,國際環(huán)境和國內(nèi)現(xiàn)實的雙重變化以及“新思維”的傳播和西學的涌入成為當代俄羅斯外交學形成和發(fā)展的現(xiàn)實土壤和思想來源。當代俄羅斯外交學是對蘇聯(lián)外交理論和實踐的反思、與西方外交學的借鑒和對話。研究這一劇變后形成的外交學對我國來說不無現(xiàn)實意義和學術(shù)意義。國內(nèi)外學者對當代俄羅斯外交實踐問題,雖多有研究,而對當代俄羅斯外交學理論方面卻幾乎無人問津。這為本課題留下充分的研究空間。 本文運用文獻研究法和比較研究法,以梳理當代俄羅斯外交學研究現(xiàn)狀為切入點,重點對當代俄羅斯外交學領(lǐng)域兩位代表性人物及其著述進行梳理,并對其研究重點逐一進行評析,從而評述當代俄羅斯外交學研究現(xiàn)狀,揭示其學術(shù)特征,總結(jié)其學術(shù)貢獻、分析其學術(shù)局限、探討其現(xiàn)實意義。 以波波夫為代表的老一代外交學研究者和以佐諾娃為代表的年輕一代學者人生經(jīng)歷、學術(shù)經(jīng)歷迥異:波波夫代表的老一代外交學研究者普遍兼具外交實踐和學術(shù)研究經(jīng)歷,即由外交家而轉(zhuǎn)為外交學家。佐諾娃代表的年輕一代外交學者普遍沒有顯著的外交實踐,學術(shù)經(jīng)歷由學生而為學者。由此導(dǎo)致二者的代表作《現(xiàn)代外交:理論與實踐》和《現(xiàn)代外交模式:形成的起源與發(fā)展的前景》的思想來源和研究視角各有側(cè)重�！冬F(xiàn)代外交:理論與實踐》的學術(shù)思想來源以對蘇聯(lián)時期外交實踐和理論的反思為主,兼有對俄羅斯獨立之初外交實踐的反思和對西方早期外交學著作的借鑒,研究視角較為傳統(tǒng);《現(xiàn)代外交模式:形成的起源與發(fā)展的前景》的學術(shù)思想來源以西方現(xiàn)代外交學文獻為主,兼有對俄羅斯獨立之初外交實踐的反思,研究視角比較符合學術(shù)前沿。二者著作雖然各有現(xiàn)實意義和學術(shù)價值及其研究的局限性,但從整體上代表了當代俄羅斯外交學當前的研究方向和水平。 當代俄羅斯外交學表現(xiàn)出了非學派且無流派、反思性與去意識形態(tài)化、西方化與單向性的總體學術(shù)特征;其學術(shù)貢獻在于突破了蘇聯(lián)外交學話語體系,開啟了俄羅斯“新外交學”研究;因理論發(fā)展時間尚短,學術(shù)研究的角度、廣度、深度、清晰度、可證度方面尚存在一定程度的局限,但進一步研究空間明顯,學術(shù)前景值得期待。
[Abstract]:Since the end of the Cold War in the early 1990s, the international environment has undergone profound changes and has a profound impact on the practice of modern diplomacy. Russia is in the center of dramatic change, the dual changes of international environment and domestic reality, the spread of "new thinking" and the influx of western studies have become the realistic soil and ideological source for the formation and development of contemporary Russian diplomacy. Contemporary Russian diplomacy is a reflection of Soviet diplomatic theory and practice, and a reference and dialogue with western diplomacy. The study of diplomacy formed after this upheaval is of practical and academic significance to our country. Although scholars at home and abroad have studied the practice of contemporary Russian diplomacy, almost no one has paid attention to the theory of contemporary Russian diplomacy. This leaves sufficient research space for this subject. This paper uses literature research and comparative research to comb the current situation of contemporary Russian diplomatic studies, focusing on the two representative figures in the field of contemporary Russian diplomacy and their writings. The research emphasis is analyzed one by one, so as to comment on the present situation of diplomatic studies in contemporary Russia, reveal its academic characteristics, sum up its academic contributions, analyze its academic limitations, and discuss its practical significance. The academic experiences of the older generation of diplomatic researchers represented by Popov and the younger generation of scholars represented by Zonova are quite different: the former generation of diplomatic researchers represented by Popov generally have both diplomatic practice and academic research experience. From a diplomat to a diplomat. The younger generation of diplomatic scholars represented by Zonova generally have no significant diplomatic practice. As a result, their masterpieces "Modern diplomacy: theory and practice" and "Modern diplomatic Model: the Origin and Development prospects of formation" have their respective ideological sources and research perspectives. The main source of academic thought is the reflection of diplomatic practice and theory during the Soviet period. It also reflects on the diplomatic practice of Russia at the beginning of its independence and draws lessons from the early works of diplomacy in the West. The academic thought of Modern diplomacy: the Origin and Development Prospect of formation is mainly from the western modern diplomatic literature, and it also reflects on the diplomatic practice of Russia at the beginning of independence. The perspective of research is more in line with the academic frontier. Although their works have practical significance and academic value as well as their limitations, they represent the current research direction and level of contemporary Russian diplomacy as a whole. Contemporary Russian diplomacy shows the overall academic characteristics of non-school and no school, reflection and deideology, westernization and unidirectionality, and its academic contribution lies in breaking through the discourse system of Soviet diplomacy. The study of "new diplomacy" in Russia has been initiated. Because the period of theoretical development is still short, the angle, breadth, depth, clarity and verifiability of academic research are still limited to a certain extent, but the space for further study is obvious. The academic future is worth looking forward to.
【學位授予單位】：外交學院
【學位級別】：博士
【學位授予年份】：2011
【分類號】：D851.2

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 劉文祥;論聯(lián)合國的預(yù)防性外交[J];當代世界與社會主義;2005年01期

2 姜毅;俄羅斯的國際地位與外交政策選擇[J];東歐中亞研究;2002年03期

3 王輝;美國對外干預(yù)的新趨向[J];國際關(guān)系學院學報;2000年01期

4 朱素梅;二十世紀外交方式的演進[J];國際關(guān)系學院學報;1997年03期

5 蘇長和;陳玉剛;劉鴻武;馬麗蓉;陳志敏;錢皓;張建新;孫德剛;葉青;汪段泳;朱杰進;李明明;;中國外交研究的新領(lǐng)域、新議程、新機遇[J];國際觀察;2010年01期

6 汪寧;;俄羅斯國際組織外交的幾個特點[J];國際觀察;2010年02期

7 倪峰;對多邊主義理論構(gòu)成的一些探索[J];國際論壇;2004年06期

8 德福安,徐鶴鳴;歐盟與中國聯(lián)合推進多邊主義及發(fā)展模式的多樣性[J];國際問題研究;2004年03期

9 祖立超;;國內(nèi)俄羅斯能源外交研究綜述[J];國際資料信息;2008年07期

10 方向勤;;預(yù)防性外交:基于概念的比較分析[J];國際政治研究;2007年03期

相關(guān)碩士學位論文 前1條

1 荊喜雙;斯大林時期蘇聯(lián)東正教會與國家政權(quán)關(guān)系問題初探（1924-1953年）[D];東北師范大學;2006年

，

本文編號：2084335