本文選題：軍事外交 + 亞太安全機(jī)制�。� 參考：《延邊大學(xué)》2012年碩士論文

【摘要】：軍事外交這一概念是二戰(zhàn)以后才出現(xiàn)的,作為國家總體外交的一個分支,被越來越多的國家或國際組織用來實(shí)現(xiàn)其不同時期的國家安全戰(zhàn)略目標(biāo)。也就是說,世界各國均以本國利益為出發(fā)點(diǎn),以本國的安全與國防戰(zhàn)略為依據(jù),以國家統(tǒng)一的對外方針、政策為原則,與政治、經(jīng)濟(jì)和文化外交活動相協(xié)調(diào),建立或發(fā)展同其他國家或國際組織的軍事聯(lián)系。 冷戰(zhàn)結(jié)束后,國際政治格局和世界安全形勢發(fā)生了巨大的變化,亞太地區(qū)逐漸成為各國軍事的聚焦地,為了維護(hù)自身安全、實(shí)現(xiàn)國家戰(zhàn)略目標(biāo),亞太各國開展了多元、靈活、務(wù)實(shí)、全方位的軍事外交。作為亞太地區(qū)特別是東北亞地區(qū)主要國家的中國、日本、韓國、朝鮮以及俄羅斯更是根據(jù)各自的國家戰(zhàn)略,分階段的開展了形式多樣的軍事外交活動。美國作為西方國家,為了獲得更多的參與亞太事務(wù)的權(quán)利,獲得對亞太地區(qū)的軍事控制權(quán),不僅重新部署了亞太軍事力量,同時還在亞太地開展了具有威懾性質(zhì)的合作性軍事外交—軍事演習(xí)。2012年1月17日,美國發(fā)表了《維持美國的全球領(lǐng)導(dǎo)地位：21世紀(jì)國防的優(yōu)先任務(wù)》的防務(wù)報告,奧巴馬在報告中特別指出將把目光轉(zhuǎn)向維護(hù)亞太地區(qū)的安全與繁榮。 亞太國家以及美國開展的軍事外交活動不僅影響了國家間的對外關(guān)系,同時也使亞太安全環(huán)境發(fā)生了變化。因此建立既能平衡亞太各國利益,又能促進(jìn)朝核問題的解決；既有利于朝鮮半島、東北亞甚至是整個亞太地區(qū)的和平與穩(wěn)定,又有利于亞太各國進(jìn)行交流與合作的亞太安全機(jī)制在此時顯得尤為重要。截至目前為止,雖然亞太地區(qū)存在著諸如東盟、亞太經(jīng)合組織等多邊或雙邊的合作機(jī)制,但是具有泛亞太性質(zhì)的安全機(jī)制仍沒有出現(xiàn),影響其出現(xiàn)的原因有很多,亞太國家的軍事外交活動和美國的軍事外交活動是影響其出現(xiàn)的重要原因之一。
[Abstract]:The concept of military diplomacy came into being after World War II. As a branch of national general diplomacy, more and more countries or international organizations have used to realize their national security strategic objectives in different periods. That is to say, all countries in the world take their own interests as their starting point, their national security and national defense strategies as their basis, their unified foreign policy and policies as their principles, and coordinate their political, economic and cultural diplomatic activities. To establish or develop military ties with other countries or international organizations. Since the end of the Cold War, great changes have taken place in the international political structure and the world security situation. The Asia-Pacific region has gradually become the focus of military affairs of various countries. In order to safeguard their own security and realize their national strategic goals, the Asia-Pacific countries have developed pluralism and flexibility. Pragmatic and comprehensive military diplomacy. China, Japan, South Korea, North Korea and Russia, as the major countries in the Asia-Pacific region, especially in Northeast Asia, have carried out various military and diplomatic activities in stages according to their respective national strategies. As a Western country, in order to gain more rights to participate in Asia-Pacific affairs and gain military control over the Asia-Pacific region, the United States not only redeployed military forces in the Asia-Pacific region, At the same time, cooperative military diplomacy and military exercises of a deterrent nature were conducted in the Asia-Pacific region. On January 17, 2012, the United States issued a defense report entitled "maintaining the United States' Global leadership: priorities for National Defense in the 21st Century." In his report, Obama highlighted a shift to security and prosperity in the Asia-Pacific region. The military and diplomatic activities carried out by the Asia-Pacific countries and the United States not only affect the foreign relations among countries, but also change the security environment in the Asia-Pacific region. Therefore, the establishment not only can balance the interests of Asia-Pacific countries, but also promote the resolution of the Korean nuclear issue; it is conducive to peace and stability on the Korean Peninsula, in Northeast Asia and even in the whole Asia-Pacific region. The Asia-Pacific security mechanism, which is also conducive to exchanges and cooperation between Asian and Pacific countries, is particularly important at this time. So far, although multilateral or bilateral cooperation mechanisms such as ASEAN and APEC exist in the Asia-Pacific region, security mechanisms of a pan-Asia-Pacific nature have not yet emerged, and there are many reasons for affecting their emergence. The military diplomacy activities of Asia-Pacific countries and the United States are one of the important reasons that influence their emergence.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：延邊大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：D815

【引證文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 蘇俊燮;冷戰(zhàn)以來朝鮮半島局勢的演變與駐韓美軍的未來[D];復(fù)旦大學(xué);2004年

，

本文編號：2025307