本文選題：北方領(lǐng)土 + 俄日關(guān)系　； 參考：《吉林大學(xué)》2012年碩士論文

【摘要】：長(zhǎng)期以來(lái)，北方領(lǐng)土問(wèn)題一直是阻礙俄日關(guān)系發(fā)展的頑固性障礙。2010年11月1日，俄羅斯總統(tǒng)梅德韋杰夫登上了俄日爭(zhēng)議島嶼中的國(guó)后島進(jìn)行視察，此舉引發(fā)了新一輪的俄日領(lǐng)土較量，俄羅斯和日本均反應(yīng)強(qiáng)烈，在事態(tài)的后續(xù)發(fā)展中各自采取了一系列舉措來(lái)展現(xiàn)自己的強(qiáng)硬立場(chǎng)，俄日領(lǐng)土爭(zhēng)端不斷升級(jí)，俄日關(guān)系持續(xù)交惡。這些最新情況對(duì)中國(guó)來(lái)說(shuō)十分值得關(guān)注，一方面俄日是中國(guó)最重要的兩個(gè)鄰國(guó)，俄日關(guān)系的走向?qū)τ谥袊?guó)的外部環(huán)境營(yíng)造有著十分重要的意義；另一方面俄日領(lǐng)土爭(zhēng)端升級(jí)帶來(lái)了一系列消極影響，這將不利于中國(guó)一直倡導(dǎo)的維護(hù)地區(qū)和平與穩(wěn)定。因此本文將立足于俄日領(lǐng)土爭(zhēng)端新動(dòng)向，結(jié)合歷史與現(xiàn)實(shí)分析俄日領(lǐng)土爭(zhēng)端不斷升級(jí)的多重影響因素，并在此基礎(chǔ)上探討俄日北方領(lǐng)土問(wèn)題前景及俄日之間的關(guān)系走向。本文的主要內(nèi)容大致分為四個(gè)部分： 第一部分，北方領(lǐng)土問(wèn)題歷史回溯。歷史上北方領(lǐng)土的歸屬不斷變遷，二戰(zhàn)前俄日爭(zhēng)議島嶼歸日本實(shí)際管轄。二戰(zhàn)期間蘇聯(lián)憑借《波司坦公告》占領(lǐng)了北方領(lǐng)土，并將其納入版圖，但舊金山和會(huì)上蘇聯(lián)沒(méi)有簽署《舊金山和約》，致使北方領(lǐng)土問(wèn)題產(chǎn)生并成為二戰(zhàn)遺產(chǎn)。二戰(zhàn)結(jié)束后，蘇日建交，雖然經(jīng)過(guò)多次談判，可北方領(lǐng)土問(wèn)題始終無(wú)法解決，也因此導(dǎo)致了兩國(guó)和平條約遲遲無(wú)法締結(jié)。 第二部分，俄日關(guān)系下的北方領(lǐng)土問(wèn)題。蘇聯(lián)解體后，北方領(lǐng)土問(wèn)題延續(xù)到俄日關(guān)系之間，俄日兩國(guó)開(kāi)始致力于改善關(guān)系，并為解決北方領(lǐng)土問(wèn)題作出了很多努力。但受兩國(guó)國(guó)內(nèi)政治以及爭(zhēng)議島嶼本身的戰(zhàn)略及經(jīng)濟(jì)價(jià)值一系列因素影響，俄日領(lǐng)土爭(zhēng)端持續(xù)難解，成為制約俄日關(guān)系發(fā)展的最大瓶頸。 第三部分，俄日領(lǐng)土爭(zhēng)端新動(dòng)向。聯(lián)系梅德韋杰夫登島背景看事態(tài)的發(fā)展情況，俄羅斯在此次領(lǐng)土爭(zhēng)端中攻勢(shì)明顯且占據(jù)著有利地位，而日本雖然處于下風(fēng)卻始終不肯妥協(xié)，俄日北方領(lǐng)土問(wèn)題矛盾不可調(diào)和，而雙方的系列舉措背后隱藏著各自深刻的的意圖，俄日領(lǐng)土爭(zhēng)端升級(jí)是國(guó)際國(guó)內(nèi)多重因素共同作用的結(jié)果。 第四部分，俄日領(lǐng)土爭(zhēng)端新動(dòng)向的影響與啟示。俄日領(lǐng)土爭(zhēng)端升級(jí)雖然造成了俄日關(guān)系惡化，但俄日北方領(lǐng)土問(wèn)題受兩國(guó)實(shí)力地位、戰(zhàn)略態(tài)勢(shì)和利益取向變化影響，因此俄日關(guān)系仍有回旋余地，不過(guò)只要北方領(lǐng)土問(wèn)題無(wú)法解決，俄日關(guān)系就很難順利發(fā)展。另外俄日領(lǐng)土爭(zhēng)端新動(dòng)向在國(guó)家關(guān)系、地區(qū)穩(wěn)定、戰(zhàn)略格局三方面對(duì)東北亞地區(qū)局勢(shì)產(chǎn)生了影響。這一系列的變化也為我國(guó)帶來(lái)一定啟示：首先要正確看待俄日關(guān)系，其次也要借鑒俄羅斯靈活的外交手段。 最后的結(jié)論部分除了對(duì)前文進(jìn)行簡(jiǎn)要的綜述外還指出，俄日領(lǐng)土爭(zhēng)端新動(dòng)向折射出俄日關(guān)系出現(xiàn)的一些新變化，但總得來(lái)看，俄日關(guān)系不會(huì)發(fā)生實(shí)質(zhì)性改變。不過(guò)受北方領(lǐng)土問(wèn)題影響，今后俄日關(guān)系雖有繼續(xù)發(fā)展的空間，但不會(huì)很順利。
[Abstract]:The issue of the northern territories has long been a persistent obstacle to the development of Russian-Japanese relations. On November 1, 2010, Russian President Dmitry Medvedev boarded the island of Houhou in the disputed islands of Russia and Japan for an inspection. The move triggered a new round of Russian-Japanese territorial rivalry. Both Russia and Japan reacted strongly. In the follow-up to the situation, each took a series of measures to show his hardline stance, and the Russian-Japanese territorial dispute continued to escalate. Relations between Russia and Japan continue to be at loggerheads. On the one hand, Russia and Japan are China's two most important neighboring countries, and the trend of Russian-Japanese relations is of great significance to the construction of China's external environment; On the other hand, the escalation of the territorial dispute between Russia and Japan has brought a series of negative effects, which will be detrimental to the maintenance of regional peace and stability that China has been advocating. Therefore, based on the new trend of Russian-Japanese territorial dispute, this paper will analyze the influence factors of the continuous escalation of Russian-Japanese territorial dispute in combination with history and reality, and on this basis will discuss the prospect of the territorial issue in the northern part of Russia and Japan and the trend of the relationship between Russia and Japan. The main content of this paper is divided into four parts: The first part is the history of the Northern Territory. Before World War II, the disputed islands of Russia and Japan were actually administered by Japan. During World War II, the Soviet Union occupied the northern territories by means of the Proclamation of Postane and incorporated them into the territory, but the Soviet Union did not sign the Treaty of San Francisco Peace at the San Francisco Peace Conference, which led to the question of the Northern Territories and became the heritage of World War II. After the end of World War II, the Soviet Union and Japan established diplomatic relations, although after many negotiations, the northern territorial issue could not be resolved, which also led to the delay in the conclusion of the peace treaty between the two countries. The second part, the northern territory question under the Russia-Japan relations. After the disintegration of the Soviet Union, the issue of the northern territories continued between Russia and Japan. Russia and Japan began to work to improve the relations and made a lot of efforts to solve the problems of the northern territories. However, influenced by a series of factors, such as domestic politics and the strategic and economic value of the disputed islands, the territorial dispute between Russia and Japan continues to be difficult to solve, which has become the biggest bottleneck restricting the development of Russian-Japanese relations. The third part, the new trend of the territory dispute between Russia and Japan. In connection with the development of the situation in the context of Medvedev's landing on the island, Russia is clearly on the offensive and occupying a favorable position in this territorial dispute, while Japan, although in a weak position, has always refused to compromise, and the contradiction between Russia and the northern part of the territory issue is irreconcilable. Behind the series of measures, the two sides have their own profound intentions. The escalation of the territory dispute between Russia and Japan is the result of the joint action of many international and domestic factors. The fourth part, the influence and enlightenment of the new trend of the territory dispute between Russia and Japan. Although the escalation of the Russian-Japanese territorial dispute has resulted in the deterioration of Russian-Japanese relations, the territorial issue in the northern part of Russia and Japan is affected by the changes in the position of strength, strategic posture and interest orientation of the two countries. Therefore, there is still room for manoeuvre in Russian-Japanese relations. However, as long as the northern territory problem can not be resolved, Russia-Japan relations will be difficult to develop smoothly. In addition, the new trend of territory dispute between Russia and Japan has influenced the situation in Northeast Asia in three aspects: state relations, regional stability and strategic pattern. This series of changes also brings some enlightenment to our country: first, to treat the relations between Russia and Japan correctly, and secondly, to draw lessons from the flexible diplomatic means of Russia. The last part of the conclusion also points out that the new trend of Russian-Japanese territorial dispute reflects some new changes in Russian-Japanese relations, but in general, there will be no substantial changes in Russian-Japanese relations. However, under the influence of the Northern Territory issue, Russia-Japan relations will not go smoothly although there is room for further development in the future.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：吉林大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D815.3;D851.2;D831.3

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 何月香;俄日領(lǐng)土糾紛難以解決原因分析[J];當(dāng)代亞太;2003年03期

2 曹云華,李昌新;試析冷戰(zhàn)后的中日俄關(guān)系演變:現(xiàn)實(shí)主義的視角[J];當(dāng)代亞太;2004年09期

3 陳潔華;艱難調(diào)整中的俄日關(guān)系[J];俄羅斯研究;2004年03期

4 劉清才;;俄日和平條約談判與北方領(lǐng)土問(wèn)題[J];俄羅斯研究;2005年04期

5 呂桂霞;;俄日關(guān)系中的“北方四島”問(wèn)題及其深層原因[J];華東師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2010年01期

6 李興;;俄日領(lǐng)土爭(zhēng)端:解決方案差異與發(fā)展前景[J];哈爾濱工業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2011年04期

7 吳大輝;;俄日島爭(zhēng):難以破解的外交“死結(jié)”[J];當(dāng)代世界;2010年12期

8 林曉光;世紀(jì)之交的日俄關(guān)系[J];日本學(xué)刊;2001年05期

9 胡明遠(yuǎn);高鵬;;俄日北方四島糾紛及其對(duì)東北亞局勢(shì)的影響[J];韶關(guān)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2011年09期

10 馬斌;;俄日島嶼爭(zhēng)端及其對(duì)俄地區(qū)戰(zhàn)略的影響[J];太平洋學(xué)報(bào);2011年10期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前2條

1 馬建光;[N];國(guó)防時(shí)報(bào);2010年

2 本報(bào)駐日本記者 于青　本報(bào)駐俄羅斯記者 張光政;[N];人民日?qǐng)?bào);2011年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 王金麗;日俄關(guān)系中的北方領(lǐng)土問(wèn)題[D];吉林大學(xué);2007年

2 孫繼湘;日俄關(guān)系中的“北方四島”問(wèn)題[D];青島大學(xué);2007年

，

本文編號(hào)：1854230