本文選題：歐洲工會(huì)聯(lián)合會(huì) + 反緊縮　； 參考：《華東師范大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：2010年至2014年這四年被歐洲工會(huì)聯(lián)合會(huì)現(xiàn)任總書(shū)記盧卡稱為"歐洲工會(huì)歷史上最糟糕的時(shí)期"。1具體而言,一方面,在歐盟與各成員國(guó)政府討論和采納緊縮政策過(guò)程中,歐洲工會(huì)處在被邊緣化的地位;另一方面,緊縮政策在歐盟成員國(guó)中陸續(xù)實(shí)施后,歐洲工會(huì)所采取的反緊縮行動(dòng)也收效甚微。案例研究從歐洲工會(huì)所采取的反緊縮戰(zhàn)略的角度切入,討論歐洲工會(huì)反緊縮運(yùn)動(dòng)效果不理想的原因。主要回答三個(gè)問(wèn)題,歐洲工會(huì)采取了什么樣的反緊縮戰(zhàn)略;歐洲工會(huì)的反緊縮戰(zhàn)略有什么樣的效果;為什么歐洲工會(huì)的反緊縮戰(zhàn)略效果不理想。首先討論2010年至2014年導(dǎo)致歐洲工會(huì)影響力降低的主要因素,這是研究歐洲工會(huì)反緊縮戰(zhàn)略的背景。然后選取歐洲工會(huì)聯(lián)合會(huì)(歐工聯(lián))作為案例,概述歐工聯(lián)的發(fā)展歷程和它在歐洲反緊縮運(yùn)動(dòng)中的重要地位作為案例選擇的依據(jù),再對(duì)其在2010年至2014年中所采取的反緊縮戰(zhàn)略作具體的分析:1)將歐工聯(lián)的反緊縮行動(dòng)劃分為宣傳與游說(shuō)、游行與罷工兩大類;2)分兩個(gè)時(shí)期,研究歐工聯(lián)反緊縮宣傳與游說(shuō)的戰(zhàn)略內(nèi)容及成效;3)以2012年"歐洲行動(dòng)和團(tuán)結(jié)日"為案例,分析歐工聯(lián)反緊縮游行與罷工的戰(zhàn)略內(nèi)容及成效;最后對(duì)四年中歐工聯(lián)反緊縮行動(dòng)所采取的戰(zhàn)略做一個(gè)總體性的分析。中心觀點(diǎn)是:以歐工聯(lián)為代表的歐洲工會(huì)組織試圖通過(guò)采取內(nèi)部(以政治游說(shuō)為代表)以及外部(以游行與罷工為代表)的反緊縮戰(zhàn)略,從歐盟機(jī)構(gòu)內(nèi)外兩個(gè)方向?qū)W盟的緊縮政策施加影響,以達(dá)到反緊縮的目標(biāo)。并且,在內(nèi)外兩種反緊縮戰(zhàn)略中,以歐工聯(lián)為代表的歐洲工會(huì)組織都進(jìn)行了戰(zhàn)略上的創(chuàng)新——如宣傳與游說(shuō)行動(dòng)中投資計(jì)劃的提出,以及游行與罷工行動(dòng)中出現(xiàn)的聯(lián)合大罷工行動(dòng)。但由于缺乏一個(gè)統(tǒng)一的、有力的反緊縮戰(zhàn)略,以歐工聯(lián)為代表的歐洲工會(huì)組織的反緊縮戰(zhàn)略效果不佳。
[Abstract]:From 2010 to 2014, the four years by Luca, the current general secretary of the union of European Union unions, called "the worst period in European Union history",.1, on the one hand, the European Union was marginalized in the process of discussing and adopting austerity policies in the European Union and its member governments; on the other hand, the austerity policy was in the EU member countries. After the continued implementation, the anti austerity action taken by the European Union also has little effect. The case study, from the angle of the anti austerity strategy adopted by the European Union, discusses the reasons why the effect of the European Union anti austerity movement is not ideal. The main answer is three questions, what kind of anti austerity strategy the European Union has adopted; the anti austerity war of the European Union trade union. The effect of the European Union's anti austerity strategy is not ideal. First, it discusses the main factors that lead to the reduction of the European Union's influence from 2010 to 2014. This is the background of the study of the anti austerity strategy of the European Union. Then, the European Union of trade unions (EU) is selected as a case to summarize the development process of the European Union. Its important position in the European anti austerity movement is the basis of case selection, and then it makes a concrete analysis of its anti austerity strategy in 2010 to 2014. 1) it divides the anti austerity action of UF into two categories: propaganda and lobbying, parade and strike, 2) and two periods to study the strategy of anti austerity propaganda and lobbying of the European Union. Content and effectiveness; 3) taking the 2012 European action and unity day as a case to analyze the strategic content and effectiveness of the anti austerity parade and strike of the union, and finally make an overall analysis of the strategy adopted by the China European Union for the anti austerity action in the last four years. The central point of view is that the European Union Organization represented by the European Union of industries is trying to adopt the internal system. The anti austerity strategy, represented by political lobbying as a representative) and the external (by parade and strike), exerts an influence on the European Union's austerity policy in two directions inside and outside the EU institutions, in order to achieve the goal of anti austerity. And in the two anti austerity strategies, the European Union of trade unions, represented by the European Union of industries, has made a strategic innovation. Such as the proposal of the investment plan in propaganda and lobbying, and the joint strike action in the parade and strike action. But the anti austerity strategy of the European Union organization, represented by the European industry union, is not good because of the lack of a unified and powerful anti austerity strategy.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：華東師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：D814.1

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前2條

1 王繼停;;金融危機(jī)背景下歐洲工會(huì)聯(lián)合會(huì)促進(jìn)就業(yè)工作略攬[J];工會(huì)理論研究(上海工會(huì)管理職業(yè)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào));2013年01期

2 陳志敏;;歐工聯(lián)的機(jī)遇與挑戰(zhàn)[J];歐洲;1993年01期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前4條

1 哈維爾·多斯 文 毛禹權(quán) 編譯;歐洲工會(huì)聯(lián)合會(huì)令人擔(dān)擾[N];社會(huì)科學(xué)報(bào);2005年

2 黃玫;歐盟擬成立企業(yè)社會(huì)責(zé)任聯(lián)盟[N];中國(guó)企業(yè)報(bào);2006年

3 記者 羽廣;工人的理由：不該由工人承擔(dān)危機(jī)后果[N];第一財(cái)經(jīng)日?qǐng)?bào);2010年

4 袁蓉君;2007：全球勞工加薪幾成定局[N];金融時(shí)報(bào);2007年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 張尚;歐洲社會(huì)模式下的歐洲工會(huì)聯(lián)合會(huì)[D];華東師范大學(xué);2009年

2 史書(shū)怡;歐洲工會(huì)聯(lián)合會(huì)的反緊縮戰(zhàn)略：2010-2014[D];華東師范大學(xué);2017年

，

本文編號(hào)：1842823