發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-04-29 06:39

  本文選題：認(rèn)同 + 中國—東盟�。� 參考：《廣西師范大學(xué)》2010年碩士論文

【摘要】： 在冷戰(zhàn)結(jié)束、亞洲金融危機(jī)等國際背景下,中國與東盟的交流與合作呈現(xiàn)出了良好的態(tài)勢(shì)——政治上形成了相互尊重、相互往來的友好局面;經(jīng)濟(jì)上取得了階段性的收獲,建立了“中國—東盟博覽會(huì)”以及“中國—東盟自由貿(mào)易區(qū)”等;安全上也加強(qiáng)了公共安全、地區(qū)安全、環(huán)境安全等多方面的合作方式。然而,這并不意味著雙方合作始終處于蜜月期”。由于歷史、政治、經(jīng)濟(jì)、種族和文化等因素的影響,東盟對(duì)中國仍持猜疑、不信任和謹(jǐn)慎的態(tài)度。尤其是某些西方學(xué)者和政治家們散布的“中國威脅論”在東盟各國也有一定的市場。東盟對(duì)中國的不信任、擔(dān)心、謹(jǐn)慎主要包括幾個(gè)方面:第一,經(jīng)濟(jì)上的擔(dān)心。東盟國家認(rèn)為中國對(duì)他們的最大威脅可能來自經(jīng)濟(jì)方面的競爭,認(rèn)為中國的廉價(jià)商品可能會(huì)把東盟的商品擠出歐美和日本市場,這不利于東盟各國經(jīng)濟(jì)的發(fā)展。第二,軍事上的擔(dān)憂。近些年來,中國大陸為了遏制臺(tái)獨(dú)分子不斷膨脹的“臺(tái)獨(dú)”野心,一直在推進(jìn)軍事現(xiàn)代化進(jìn)程。另外,中國在南中國海問題上維護(hù)國家主權(quán)獨(dú)立、領(lǐng)土完整的堅(jiān)定態(tài)度也讓東盟國家擔(dān)心中國可能會(huì)訴諸武力解決南中國海的爭端。第三,種族和文化上的疑慮。在東盟各國中,華人華僑人數(shù)眾多且經(jīng)濟(jì)實(shí)力雄厚,某些東盟成員國擔(dān)心華人華僑的“中國情結(jié)”升級(jí),使他們加大在華投資力度損害本國、本地區(qū)的利益。再加上“大中華經(jīng)濟(jì)圈”論調(diào)的渲染,更加深了東盟對(duì)本地區(qū)華人、華僑問題的憂慮。這也影響到東盟與中國區(qū)域合作進(jìn)程的發(fā)展。 雖然中國—東盟區(qū)域合作呈現(xiàn)了喜人的局面,但同時(shí)也有令人擔(dān)憂的阻礙因素。中國與東盟合作進(jìn)程變化引起了國內(nèi)外學(xué)者的關(guān)注,眾多學(xué)者運(yùn)用國際關(guān)系理論中的現(xiàn)實(shí)主義、新自由主義、建構(gòu)主義等理論來分析雙方合作的原因以及對(duì)雙方合作的展望。按照現(xiàn)實(shí)主義、新自由主義的理論來分析,中國與東盟的合作中出現(xiàn)的摩擦?xí)闺p方陷入權(quán)力與利益之爭。筆者試圖對(duì)中國—東盟區(qū)域合作做進(jìn)一步分析研究,以彌補(bǔ)合作理論的不足,尤其注重從權(quán)力、利益困境來論述建構(gòu)主義以夯實(shí)本論文的研究根基。既可以作為現(xiàn)實(shí)主義等理論的補(bǔ)充,也可以達(dá)到拓寬研究領(lǐng)域的目的。然而,以建構(gòu)主義中的一個(gè)分支理論——“認(rèn)同”的觀點(diǎn)來分析中國—東盟的區(qū)域合作還是處于“寄人籬下”的境遇,沒有獨(dú)立出來而得到應(yīng)有的重視。中國在與東盟合作進(jìn)程中始終堅(jiān)持的一條重要原則就是:以積極主動(dòng)、坦誠、信任的態(tài)度來處理雙方合作中存在的摩擦,以消除東盟的疑慮和擔(dān)心,用實(shí)際行動(dòng)來建構(gòu)“國際社會(huì)負(fù)責(zé)任大國”形象,促使雙方形成良好的睦鄰友好合作的身份認(rèn)同和觀念認(rèn)同。中國通過不斷地負(fù)責(zé)任的實(shí)踐行為,盡力向東盟國家強(qiáng)調(diào)自己是維護(hù)本地區(qū)的穩(wěn)定和帶來本地區(qū)繁榮的積極因素,而非西方所鼓噪的——威脅來源。 中國與東盟合作讓東盟國家對(duì)中國“亞洲一員”的身份有了更深刻的認(rèn)同,雙方形成了互信理念。并且,通過互信又拓寬了雙方合作領(lǐng)域的深度和廣度,從而超越了現(xiàn)實(shí)主義主要對(duì)權(quán)力和利益的追逐的內(nèi)核。 認(rèn)同是一個(gè)不斷發(fā)展的過程,當(dāng)發(fā)展到高級(jí)階段時(shí)就會(huì)呈現(xiàn)出集體認(rèn)同的形式。區(qū)域合作中各行為體在互動(dòng)過程中將自己的身份與組織的身份逐步模糊起來,從而發(fā)展到認(rèn)同的最高層次——集體認(rèn)同。集體認(rèn)同的形成為區(qū)域合作中各行為體深入合作奠定了堅(jiān)實(shí)的基礎(chǔ)。中國與東盟的認(rèn)同處于初級(jí)階段,雙方尚處于集體認(rèn)同的構(gòu)建過程中,這都是雙方互動(dòng)中還存在一些分歧所致。中國為了構(gòu)建雙方的良性認(rèn)同已顯示出十分友好的合作誠意,但這些誠意需要東盟國家的認(rèn)同并反映在其實(shí)踐行動(dòng)中。然而,東盟國家對(duì)中國的友好合作誠意的理解還不夠,這會(huì)影響雙方良性認(rèn)同的形成,甚至?xí)绊戨p方的深入合作。面對(duì)這一困境,筆者選取認(rèn)同理論這一創(chuàng)新范式來詮釋雙方合作面臨困境的原因以及解決的途徑,同時(shí)也是開拓中國—東盟區(qū)域合作新的現(xiàn)實(shí)要求。
[Abstract]:In the international background of the end of the cold war and the Asian financial crisis, the exchanges and cooperation between China and ASEAN have shown a good situation - a friendly situation of mutual respect and mutual exchange; the economic gains have been achieved, the "China ASEAN Expo" and "China ASEAN Free Trade Zone" have been established. Security, regional security, environmental security and many other ways of cooperation. However, this does not mean that cooperation between the two sides is always on a honeymoon period. The "China Threat Theory" spread by politicians also has a certain market in ASEAN countries. ASEAN's distrust of China, worry, and prudence mainly include several aspects: first, economic worries. ASEAN countries believe that China's greatest threat to them may come from economic competition, and that China's cheap goods may bring ASEAN. This is not conducive to the economic development of the ASEAN countries. Second, the military concerns. In recent years, China has been promoting the process of military modernization in order to contain the expansion of the "Taiwan independence" ambition. In addition, China maintains national sovereignty, independence and territorial integrity on the South Central Sea issue. The firm attitude also makes ASEAN countries worried that China may resort to force to settle the dispute over the South China Sea. Third, ethnic and cultural doubts. Among the ASEAN countries, the number of Chinese and overseas Chinese is large and the economic strength is strong. Some ASEAN members are worried about the escalation of Chinese Chinese in China, so that they will increase their investment in China. The interests of the country and the region, as well as the "Great China Economic Circle", have deepened ASEAN's concern about the problems of the Chinese and overseas Chinese in the region. This also affects the development of regional cooperation between ASEAN and China.
Although China ASEAN Regional Cooperation presents a happy situation, but at the same time there are worrying obstacles. The changes in the process of cooperation between China and ASEAN have aroused the attention of scholars both at home and abroad. Many scholars have applied the theory of realism, Neo liberalism and constructivism in the theory of international relations to analyze the reasons for the cooperation between the two sides. According to the theory of realism and Neo liberalism, the frictions in the cooperation between China and ASEAN will cause the two sides to fall into the dispute of power and interest. The author tries to make a further analysis and study of China ASEAN Regional Cooperation in order to make up for the lack of cooperation theory, and especially pay attention to the plight of power and interests. Constructivism can tamp the research foundation of this paper. It can not only supplement the theory of realism, but also broaden the field of research. However, the analysis of the regional cooperation between China and ASEAN is still in a "hedge" situation with a branch theory of constructivism, "identity", and is not independent. One of the important principles that China has always adhered to in the process of cooperation with ASEAN is to deal with the frictions that exist in the cooperation between the two sides with a positive, honest and trusting attitude in order to eliminate the doubts and fears of ASEAN, and to construct the image of the "responsible international community" with practical action to promote the formation of the two sides. Good neighborly, friendly and cooperative identity and conceptual identity. Through constant and responsible practice, China has tried to emphasize to the ASEAN countries that it is a positive factor in maintaining the stability of the region and bringing about the prosperity of the region, not the threat from the West.
The cooperation between China and ASEAN has enabled ASEAN countries to have a deeper recognition of the identity of the "one member of Asia". Both sides have formed a concept of mutual trust. And, through mutual trust, it broadens the depth and breadth of the field of cooperation between the two sides, thus surpassing the core of the pursuit of power and interests.
Identity is a continuous development process. When it develops to the advanced stage, it will show the form of collective identity. In the process of regional cooperation, each actor gradually blurs its identity and organization identity in the process of interaction, thus developing to the highest level of identity, the collective identity. The form of collective identity becomes a regional cooperation. China and ASEAN have laid a solid foundation for cooperation. China and ASEAN are in the primary stage. Both sides are still in the process of building collective identity. This is the result of some differences in the interaction between the two sides. China has shown a very friendly cooperation sincerity to build a benign identity between the two sides, but these sincerity require ASEAN countries. However, the ASEAN countries' understanding of the sincerity of China's friendship and cooperation is not enough. This will affect the formation of the two sides' good identity and even the deep cooperation between the two sides. The way to decide is also a new realistic requirement for developing China ASEAN regional cooperation.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：廣西師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2010
【分類號(hào)】：D822.3;F752.7

【引證文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 許南垣;朱曉輝;趙云;陳茜茜;;云南—東盟文化服務(wù)產(chǎn)業(yè)的互動(dòng)發(fā)展[J];昆明理工大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2011年02期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 石洪宇;建構(gòu)主義視角下的中國與東盟安全合作研究[D];廣西師范學(xué)院;2012年

，

本文編號(hào)：1818852