本文選題：海峽兩岸 + 聯(lián)合國代表權�。� 參考：《首都師范大學》2012年碩士論文

【摘要】：聯(lián)合國代表權問題是海峽兩岸關系問題中一個比較復雜的、敏感的問題。1971年26屆聯(lián)大召開之前,海峽兩岸在聯(lián)大斗爭的焦點集中在誰代表中國的主權問題上；80年代以來,海峽兩岸在聯(lián)大斗爭的焦點集中在“重返聯(lián)合國”和反對重返問題上。研究海峽兩岸在聯(lián)合國代表權問題上的斗爭,必須放在復雜的國際背景下進行分析。 本文對不同時期兩岸關于聯(lián)合國代表權問題的斗爭進行梳理,力圖探尋兩岸在聯(lián)合國問題上的癥結所在,進一步化解兩岸之間在聯(lián)合國問題上爭論,開創(chuàng)兩岸和平發(fā)展新局面。 第一部分：著重論述了中國加入聯(lián)合國問題的緣起。1949年中華人民共和國的成立和國民黨敗退臺灣,使中華人民共和國成為中國唯一合法的政府,臺灣當局在美國的支持下不愿放棄其在聯(lián)合國的代表權,從而使海峽兩岸在聯(lián)合國代表權問題上展開了激烈的斗爭。 第二部分：著重論述了40年代末至50年代初海峽兩岸圍繞聯(lián)合國代表權的斗爭。由于國共兩黨內戰(zhàn)與美國插手中國事務,致使海峽兩岸形成了政治、軍事對峙,在聯(lián)合國的斗爭主要圍繞誰是中國的“合法代表”。由于以美國為首的西方國家對中國聯(lián)合國代表權橫加干涉,致使中華人民共和國的代表權長期被擱置。 第三部分：著重論述了60年代中期至70年代初海峽兩岸圍繞加入聯(lián)合國而展開的斗爭。這一時期由于國際形勢變化,聯(lián)合國內部格局也發(fā)生了變化,美國對華政策發(fā)生重大轉變,致使聯(lián)合國“2758號決議”終于恢復了中華人民共和國在聯(lián)合國的合法席位。 第四部分：著重論述了80年代末至90年代兩岸之間圍繞臺灣“重返聯(lián)合國”問題展開的斗爭。主要論述了李登輝執(zhí)政時期妄圖利用“重返聯(lián)合國”達到分裂國家,制造“一中一臺”的目的。中國政府始終堅持“一個中國”原則,反對任何形式的分裂活動。 第五部分：著重論述了新世紀以來兩岸之間圍繞臺灣“重返”與“加入”聯(lián)合國問題展開的斗爭。以陳水扁為代表的民進黨執(zhí)政后,同樣利用聯(lián)合國代表權問題進行一系列分裂國家活動。國民黨重新執(zhí)政后,提出“外交休兵”政策,不再提臺灣加入聯(lián)合國的問題,有利于兩岸關系走向緩和。 總之,兩岸之間只有堅持一個中國原則,反對任何形式的分裂活動,才能抓住機遇,迎接挑戰(zhàn),創(chuàng)造解決臺灣問題的新途徑,促進祖國早日實現(xiàn)統(tǒng)一。
[Abstract]:The question of the representation of the United Nations is a relatively complex and sensitive issue in cross-strait relations. Before the convening of the 26th session of the General Assembly in 1971, the struggle between the two sides of the Taiwan Strait focused on the question of who represents China's sovereignty since the 1980s.The struggle between the two sides of the strait at the UN General Assembly focuses on the issue of "return to the UN" and opposition to it.The study of the struggle between the two sides of the Taiwan Strait in the United Nations must be analysed in a complex international context.This paper combs the struggle between the two sides of the strait on the issue of UN representation in different periods, tries to find out the crux of the UN issue between the two sides of the strait, further resolves the dispute between the two sides on the UN issue, and opens up a new situation for the peaceful development of the two sides of the strait.The first part focuses on the origin of China's accession to the United Nations. The founding of the people's Republic of China in 1949 and the defeat of the Kuomintang in Taiwan made the people's Republic of China the sole legitimate government of China.The Taiwan authorities, with the support of the United States, are unwilling to give up their representation in the United Nations, which has led to a fierce struggle between the two sides of the Taiwan Strait on the issue of representation in the United Nations.The second part focuses on the struggle between the two sides of the Taiwan Strait around the representation of the United Nations in the late 1940s and early 1950s.As a result of the civil war between the Kuomintang and the Communist Party and the intervention of the United States in China's affairs, the two sides of the Taiwan Strait have become political and military confrontations, and the struggle at the United Nations revolves around who is China's "legitimate representative."The United States-led western countries have interfered with China's representation in the United Nations, which has caused the people's Republic of China's representation to be shelved for a long time.The third part focuses on the struggle between the two sides of the Taiwan Strait to join the United Nations from the mid-1960s to the early 1970s.During this period, due to the changes in the international situation, the internal structure of the United Nations has also changed, and the United States' China policy has undergone a major change, resulting in the United Nations "Resolution 2758" finally restoring the legitimate seat of the people's Republic of China in the United Nations.The fourth part focuses on the struggle between the two sides of the strait around Taiwan's return to the United Nations in the late 1980s and 1990s.This paper mainly discusses Li Denghui's attempt to use "return to the United Nations" to split the country and create "one China, one Taiwan".The Chinese government has always adhered to the one-China principle and opposed any form of separatist activities.The fifth part focuses on the struggle between the two sides over Taiwan's "return" and "accession" to the United Nations since the new century.The DPP, represented by Chen Shuibian, has also used the UN representation to carry out a series of separatist activities.After the KMT returned to power, it put forward the policy of "diplomatic withdrawal of troops" and stopped mentioning the issue of Taiwan's entry into the United Nations, which was conducive to the relaxation of cross-strait relations.In short, only by adhering to the one-China principle and opposing any form of separatist activities can the two sides seize the opportunity, meet the challenges, create a new way to resolve the Taiwan issue, and promote the early reunification of the motherland.
【學位授予單位】：首都師范大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：D618;D813.2

【相似文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 ;一周大事(1993年5月3日—5月9日)[J];w，

本文編號：1756557