交往行動、戰(zhàn)略對話與中國負責(zé)任大國身份建構(gòu)
發(fā)布時間:2018-03-29 17:01
本文選題:交往行動 切入點:國家身份 出處:《世界經(jīng)濟與政治》2017年02期
【摘要】:哈貝馬斯的交往行動理論可以被運用到身份研究當中。根據(jù)這一理論,施動者之間是在一個共同的生活世界當中通過爭論、商議和勸說的過程來交換理由和論據(jù)的,也就是說,爭論的雙方都擁有平等的地位。這種商議和爭論的結(jié)果有可能是雙方之間就一個特定的問題形成了共識,也可能是雙方之間由于分歧過大而各自保留自身的論點,但是在交往行動中互動的任何一方都有可能被對方所提供的更好的論據(jù)所說服。作者結(jié)合中美戰(zhàn)略與經(jīng)濟對話,分析了中國通過這一機制來為自身建構(gòu)一種負責(zé)任大國身份的過程。在這一機制當中,中美兩國之間就相互的國際責(zé)任和身份定位等問題進行了爭論,并且在各自保留異議的基礎(chǔ)上達成了一定的共識。中國通過中美戰(zhàn)略與經(jīng)濟對話在一定程度上減少了美國對中國的疑慮,并且使自我的身份定位在一定程度上被美國所接受。同時,作為一種理論工具,交往行動理論也有助于推動對中國同其他國家的各種雙邊和多邊對話機制的進一步深入研究,從而對中國同相關(guān)國家開展戰(zhàn)略對話具有重要的指導(dǎo)意義。
[Abstract]:Habermas's theory of communicative action can be applied to identity research. According to this theory, the actors exchange arguments and arguments through the process of argument, negotiation and persuasion in a common world of life. Both sides of the dispute have equal status. The result of this negotiation and argument may be a consensus between the two sides on a particular issue, or a disagreement between the two sides, which may lead each side to retain its own arguments, But any party that interacts in a relationship is likely to be persuaded by the better arguments offered by the other. The author combines the strategic and economic dialogue between China and the United States. This paper analyzes the process of China's establishment of a responsible power identity for itself through this mechanism. In this mechanism, China and the United States argue over the issues of mutual international responsibility and identity orientation. And reached a certain consensus on the basis of their respective reservations. China, through the China-US Strategic and Economic Dialogue, to a certain extent reduced the US misgivings about China. At the same time, as a theoretical tool, the theory of interaction and action also helps to promote further research into the various bilateral and multilateral dialogue mechanisms between China and other countries. Therefore, it has important guiding significance for China to carry out strategic dialogue with relevant countries.
【作者單位】: 對外經(jīng)濟貿(mào)易大學(xué)國際關(guān)系學(xué)院;
【基金】:對外經(jīng)濟貿(mào)易大學(xué)中國企業(yè)“走出去”協(xié)同創(chuàng)新中心科研項目“‘走出去’戰(zhàn)略對‘一帶一路’國家的政治經(jīng)濟影響研究”(項目編號:201504YY004A)的階段性研究成果;對外經(jīng)濟貿(mào)易大學(xué)中央高校基本科研業(yè)務(wù)費專項資金(批準號:15QN14)的資助
【分類號】:D822.3
【相似文獻】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 陳須隆;;試論中國的“新戰(zhàn)略對話”[J];國際問題研究;2010年06期
2 郭隆隆;增信釋疑話中美戰(zhàn)略對話[J];國際展望;2005年16期
3 陳文鑫;;承上啟下的戰(zhàn)略對話[J];w攣胖蕓,
本文編號:1682032
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/shekelunwen/waijiao/1682032.html
最近更新
教材專著