本文選題：歐盟　切入點(diǎn)：中國　出處：《上海外國語大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：歐盟被國內(nèi)外廣泛看作人權(quán)的捍衛(wèi)者。其作為全球人權(quán)推動(dòng)者的身份的演變同時(shí)反映了國際人權(quán)制度逐步的發(fā)展。國際人權(quán)制度的出現(xiàn)要追溯到第二次世界大戰(zhàn)結(jié)束:1948年,聯(lián)合國起草并批準(zhǔn)了“世界人權(quán)宣言”,這是形成和推動(dòng)國際人權(quán)發(fā)展的關(guān)鍵的一步。歐盟和中國的官方聲明均認(rèn)為,多年來人權(quán)對話為雙方進(jìn)行深入討論和溝通提供了基礎(chǔ),但仍有許多問題。本文分析了歐盟對中國人權(quán)外交困境的根源問題,同時(shí)也討論了歐盟將人權(quán)問題作為其外交核心的承諾。歐盟有很大的可能通過使用眾多工具和官方對話以在外交層面促進(jìn)人權(quán),但也有一些歐洲學(xué)者認(rèn)為,中國實(shí)際上在實(shí)踐人權(quán)方面不會(huì)得到較好的成果。鑒于歐盟與中國已經(jīng)建立戰(zhàn)略伙伴關(guān)系,所以國際政治結(jié)構(gòu)對歐盟與中國之間的合作有很大的影響。合作初期,由于歐盟經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)達(dá),故較中國享有一定特權(quán),但時(shí)至今日,中國的崛起已經(jīng)改變了關(guān)系的本質(zhì)。此外,本文將討論戰(zhàn)略伙伴關(guān)系的概念,及其制定,意義與影響。因此,作為研究的相關(guān)問題,本文將提出人權(quán)問題納入戰(zhàn)略伙伴關(guān)系是合理的問題。本論文的理論基礎(chǔ)主要是現(xiàn)實(shí)主義和建構(gòu)主義。國際關(guān)系理論中的現(xiàn)實(shí)主義觀點(diǎn)認(rèn)為,人權(quán)不應(yīng)成為外交決策的決定因素�；谥鳈�(quán)平等、互不干涉內(nèi)政的現(xiàn)代國家體系被視為國際關(guān)系的一個(gè)前提和保證,因?yàn)樗箛抑g不同的價(jià)值觀得以共存,以及促進(jìn)人權(quán)的外交政策被視為天真的理想主義。另一方面,建構(gòu)主義的觀點(diǎn)認(rèn)為,規(guī)范塑造國家的身份,利益和行為。這些因素將在本文中深入分析探討,并理解每一方不同的文化背景和文化差異。盡管目前人權(quán)已經(jīng)被國際法所定義,但歐盟與中國的關(guān)系已經(jīng)因各方對人權(quán)的理解方式深刻影響的文化差異而有了一絲緊張。本文承認(rèn)國際人權(quán)法的合法性,但要強(qiáng)調(diào)歐盟和中國合作中人權(quán)外交的差異還有其他關(guān)鍵因素,并且如果我們想對歐盟與中國關(guān)系有更全面的理解,這些因素就不能被最小化。
[Abstract]:The European Union is widely regarded as a defender of human rights both at home and abroad. Its evolution as a global human rights promoter also reflects the progressive development of the international human rights system, which dates back to the end of the second World War: 1948, The drafting and ratification by the United Nations of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights is a key step towards the formation and advancement of international human rights. The official statements of the European Union and China believe that, over the years, the dialogue on human rights has provided the basis for in-depth discussions and communication between the two sides, However, there are still many problems. This paper analyzes the root causes of the EU's dilemma in human rights diplomacy with China. It also discussed the European Union's commitment to making human rights the core of its diplomacy. The European Union has great potential to promote human rights at the diplomatic level through the use of numerous tools and official dialogue, but some European scholars believe that. In fact, China will not achieve better results in the practice of human rights. Since the EU and China have already established a strategic partnership, the international political structure has a great impact on the cooperation between the EU and China. At the beginning of cooperation, The EU enjoys a certain privilege over China because of its developed economy. But today, the rise of China has changed the nature of the relationship. In addition, this paper will discuss the concept of strategic partnership, its formulation, significance and influence. As a related issue, it is reasonable to bring human rights into strategic partnership. The theoretical basis of this thesis is mainly realism and constructivism. Human rights should not be a determining factor in diplomatic decision-making. A modern system of States based on sovereign equality and non-interference in each other's internal affairs is seen as a prerequisite and guarantee for international relations, as it allows for the coexistence of different values among States, And foreign policy to promote human rights is seen as naive idealism. On the other hand, the constructivist view is that norms shape the identity, interests, and behavior of a country. These factors will be discussed in depth in this article. And understanding the different cultural backgrounds and cultural differences of each party... despite the fact that human rights are currently defined under international law, But relations between the European Union and China have been strained by cultural differences in the way in which human rights are understood. This article acknowledges the legitimacy of international human rights law. But there are other key factors to highlight the differences in human rights diplomacy between the EU and China, and they cannot be minimized if we want to have a more comprehensive understanding of the relationship between the EU and China.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：上海外國語大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：D814.1;D822.3

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 徐龍第;孫友晉;;主權(quán)債務(wù)危機(jī)下的歐盟外交[J];國際問題研究;2013年01期

2 陳志敏;戴炳然;潘忠岐;丁純;羅湘衡;;中國在中歐關(guān)系中的重點(diǎn)及戰(zhàn)略[J];太平洋學(xué)報(bào);2012年10期

3 周喬;;《里斯本條約》對歐盟外交政策的影響及中國應(yīng)對[J];中共濟(jì)南市委黨校學(xué)報(bào);2012年03期

4 葉江;;中歐全面戰(zhàn)略伙伴關(guān)系面臨新挑戰(zhàn)[J];國際問題研究;2011年03期

5 潘忠岐;高興偉;;中歐主權(quán)觀分歧及其影響[J];歐洲研究;2011年02期

6 洪郵生;;“規(guī)范性力量歐洲”與歐盟對華外交[J];世界經(jīng)濟(jì)與政治;2010年01期

7 馮仲平;;關(guān)于歐盟外交政策的幾個(gè)問題[J];現(xiàn)代國際關(guān)系;2006年04期

8 蔡拓;全球治理的中國視角與實(shí)踐[J];中國社會(huì)科學(xué);2004年01期

9 陳志尚;東方文化的變遷對人權(quán)的影響[J];北京大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2003年05期

10 陳來;儒家倫理與“人權(quán)”價(jià)值[J];北京大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);1998年05期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 郭芳;論西方人權(quán)觀念的演變[D];首都師范大學(xué);2002年

，

本文編號(hào)：1605669