本文選題：氣候變化　切入點(diǎn)：氣候正義　出處：《法學(xué)》2014年09期 　論文類型：期刊論文

【摘要】：德班平臺的正式啟動是國際氣候談判的重大成果,同時開啟了2020年后國際減排法律制度構(gòu)建的進(jìn)程。氣候正義是一個國家采取氣候政策的正當(dāng)性的評價尺度,也是進(jìn)行國際合作的基礎(chǔ)。氣候正義主要是一種社會正義和法律正義,包括分配正義與矯正正義。對于中國而言,體現(xiàn)正義價值的國際減排法律制度應(yīng)該建立在《聯(lián)合國氣候變化框架公約》基礎(chǔ)之上,并應(yīng)以"共同但有區(qū)別責(zé)任"原則為基石,以"減緩"、"適應(yīng)"、"資金"、"技術(shù)"為支柱。為在德班平臺氣候談判中爭取主動,中國可考慮適當(dāng)調(diào)整原有談判立場。同時,中國宜通過"命令控制型"和"市場引導(dǎo)型"兩種模式來落實(shí)體現(xiàn)氣候正義的國內(nèi)減排法律規(guī)制。
[Abstract]:The official launch of the Durban platform is a major achievement of international climate negotiations and starts the process of building a legal regime for international emissions reduction after 2020. Climate justice is an evaluation measure of the legitimacy of a country's climate policy. Climate justice is mainly a kind of social justice and legal justice, including distributive justice and corrective justice. For China, The international legal regime for emission reduction, reflecting the value of justice, should be based on the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate change and should be based on the principle of "common but differentiated responsibilities", With "mitigation", "adaptation", "finance" and "technology" as the pillars. In order to take the initiative in the climate negotiations of the Durban platform, China may consider adjusting its original negotiating position appropriately... at the same time, China should adopt the two models of "order control" and "market guidance" to implement the domestic legal regulation of emission reduction, which embodies the climate justice.
【作者單位】： 吉林大學(xué)法學(xué)院;
【分類號】：X16;D815
，

本文編號：1582205