本文關(guān)鍵詞： 南海 漁業(yè)合作 挪威 冰島　出處：《外交學(xué)院》2013年碩士論文　論文類(lèi)型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：南海，西方國(guó)家稱(chēng)之為南中國(guó)海，是中國(guó)四大陸緣海之一，因位于中國(guó)最南端而得名。從南至北依次被中國(guó)臺(tái)灣、菲律賓、文萊、馬來(lái)西亞、越南、中國(guó)所包圍。南海是一個(gè)天然的大漁場(chǎng)，漁業(yè)資源豐富且種類(lèi)繁多。自20世紀(jì)60年代起，隨著南海權(quán)益爭(zhēng)議的持續(xù)升溫，南海海域漁業(yè)資源開(kāi)發(fā)利用中的糾紛也不斷升級(jí)。近年，更是屢屢出現(xiàn)我國(guó)漁民被別國(guó)海警追逐、壓扣，與他國(guó)漁民發(fā)生沖突等事件。為了解決南海漁業(yè)糾紛，，實(shí)現(xiàn)該海域漁業(yè)資源的永續(xù)發(fā)展，南海周邊各國(guó)已經(jīng)開(kāi)始就漁業(yè)合作展開(kāi)交流，某些國(guó)家還建立了雙邊甚至是多邊的合作機(jī)制。然而，目前南海海域漁業(yè)合作的機(jī)制尚不完善，未能有效解決漁業(yè)資源開(kāi)發(fā)中的矛盾與糾紛。 上世紀(jì)八十年代，挪威、冰島兩國(guó)成功就揚(yáng)馬延島爭(zhēng)議海域漁業(yè)資源共同開(kāi)發(fā)達(dá)成協(xié)議并建立相關(guān)合作機(jī)制，該合作案成為和平解決爭(zhēng)議海域漁業(yè)糾紛的典范。本文剖析了揚(yáng)馬延島爭(zhēng)議海域漁業(yè)糾紛的解決過(guò)程，對(duì)比了揚(yáng)馬延島海域漁業(yè)糾紛與南海海域漁業(yè)糾紛的相似之處與不同之處，從而得出實(shí)現(xiàn)南海漁業(yè)合作的可能的途徑，即擱置島嶼及海域主權(quán)爭(zhēng)議，在平等、互利的原則下進(jìn)行磋商，建立類(lèi)似調(diào)解委員會(huì)的政府組織推動(dòng)南海周邊國(guó)家就漁業(yè)合作達(dá)成協(xié)議。最終，實(shí)現(xiàn)南海海域漁業(yè)合作。
[Abstract]:The South China Sea, known as the South China Sea by Western countries, is one of the four largest continental seas in China, named for its southernmost position. From south to north, it is followed by Taiwan, the Philippines, Brunei, Malaysia, and Vietnam. Surrounded by China, the South China Sea is a large natural fishing ground, rich in fishery resources and rich in variety. Since 1960s, as disputes over rights and interests in the South China Sea continue to heat up, Disputes over the exploitation and utilization of fishery resources in the South China Sea have also been escalating. In recent years, there have been many incidents in which Chinese fishermen have been chased, impounded, and clashed with other fishermen in other countries. In order to resolve fishing disputes in the South China Sea, To realize the sustainable development of fishery resources in the South China Sea, countries around the South China Sea have begun to exchange fishery cooperation, and some countries have also established bilateral or even multilateral cooperation mechanisms. However, at present, the mechanism of fisheries cooperation in the South China Sea area is still not perfect. The contradiction and dispute in fishery resources exploitation have not been solved effectively. In -20s, Norway and Iceland successfully reached an agreement on the joint development of fishery resources in the disputed waters of Yanmayen Island and established relevant cooperation mechanisms. The cooperation case has become a model for the peaceful settlement of fishery disputes in the disputed sea areas. This paper analyzes the process of resolving fishery disputes in the disputed waters of Yangmayen Island. By comparing the similarities and differences between the fishery disputes in Yangmaayen Island and the South China Sea, the possible ways to realize the fishery cooperation in the South China Sea are obtained, that is, to shelve the sovereignty dispute between the islands and the sea area, and to be equal. On the basis of mutually beneficial consultations, government organizations such as mediation committees should be set up to push the countries around the South China Sea to reach an agreement on fishery cooperation, and finally to achieve fishery cooperation in the South China Sea.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：外交學(xué)院
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D993.5;D815.3

【引證文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 羅佳;;南海刑事司法合作初探——以保護(hù)漁民權(quán)益為視角[J];法制與社會(huì);2015年06期

本文編號(hào)：1523614