本文關(guān)鍵詞： 中美關(guān)系 內(nèi)在邏輯結(jié)構(gòu) 歷史反思 結(jié)構(gòu)重構(gòu)　出處：《上海師范大學(xué)》2015年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：本文將中美關(guān)系作為一種體系,以邏輯結(jié)構(gòu)的視角分析、考察中美關(guān)系的歷史,發(fā)現(xiàn)有益經(jīng)驗(yàn)和存在問(wèn)題,分析影響因素,旨在回答沖突與對(duì)抗并非中美關(guān)系的必然邏輯,“大國(guó)政治悲劇”的理論預(yù)言也不一定就是中美關(guān)系的必然歸宿,中美關(guān)系完全可以構(gòu)建起一個(gè)符合雙方根本利益且有利于世界和平與發(fā)展的內(nèi)在邏輯結(jié)構(gòu)。在中美關(guān)系越來(lái)越成為彼此最重要的一對(duì)雙邊關(guān)系,且兩國(guó)在有關(guān)建立新型大國(guó)關(guān)系的內(nèi)涵問(wèn)題的認(rèn)知上尚未取得根本一致的情況下,以期能夠提供一點(diǎn)學(xué)理支撐和對(duì)策思路。本文運(yùn)用歷史分析法,結(jié)合大量文獻(xiàn)和史實(shí),將自中華人民共和國(guó)成立迄今的中美關(guān)系內(nèi)在邏輯結(jié)構(gòu)劃分為嚴(yán)重冷戰(zhàn)思維下的敵對(duì)疏離結(jié)構(gòu)、政治相對(duì)緩和下的戰(zhàn)略融合結(jié)構(gòu)、政經(jīng)軍全面推進(jìn)的互惠伙伴結(jié)構(gòu)、防范思維下的接觸與遏制結(jié)構(gòu)和應(yīng)對(duì)共同威脅的合作與競(jìng)爭(zhēng)結(jié)構(gòu)等五個(gè)階段進(jìn)行了梳理和分析,并在對(duì)影響中美關(guān)系內(nèi)在邏輯結(jié)構(gòu)主要因素的客觀理性分析基礎(chǔ)上,運(yùn)用演繹推理的方式推導(dǎo)出中美關(guān)系應(yīng)有的理想內(nèi)在邏輯結(jié)構(gòu),提出并論證了構(gòu)建這種應(yīng)有理想邏輯結(jié)構(gòu)的主要路徑。經(jīng)研究發(fā)現(xiàn),中美作為當(dāng)今世界上兩個(gè)大國(guó),盡管具有異質(zhì)性且存在著這樣或那樣的問(wèn)題,甚至有過(guò)戰(zhàn)場(chǎng)上的直接沖突,但無(wú)論歷史上還是現(xiàn)在以及未來(lái)都存在著可以和諧共存的因素,也具備戰(zhàn)略合作的基礎(chǔ),沖突與對(duì)抗絕非大國(guó)關(guān)系的必然邏輯,完全可以走出一條不再重蹈歷史上大國(guó)關(guān)系歷史宿命的全新道路。中美兩國(guó)人民和領(lǐng)袖完全應(yīng)該有這樣的智慧和膽略將其化為現(xiàn)實(shí)。只要摒棄冷戰(zhàn)思維,超越零和理念,在良性競(jìng)爭(zhēng)的前提下,完全可以求同存異、相互借重、互惠互利,建立起既符合本國(guó)切身利益亦有益于世界的,基于彼此客觀理性認(rèn)知基礎(chǔ)上,各領(lǐng)域間相互聯(lián)系、相互作用從而達(dá)到平衡對(duì)稱、和諧統(tǒng)一的距離安排,即和諧共存的內(nèi)在邏輯結(jié)構(gòu)關(guān)系。而作為具體的實(shí)施路徑,則必須做到:摒棄冷戰(zhàn)思維,鋪設(shè)良性競(jìng)爭(zhēng)合作共贏之路;擴(kuò)大經(jīng)濟(jì)合作,夯實(shí)相互依存共同發(fā)展基礎(chǔ);落實(shí)相互尊重,減少和避免摩擦與戰(zhàn)略沖突;深化求同存異,保持相互間經(jīng)常性戰(zhàn)略互動(dòng);健全互信機(jī)制,確保絕不發(fā)生重大戰(zhàn)略誤讀;拓展合作領(lǐng)域,增加雙方更多合作果實(shí)收獲。簡(jiǎn)而言之,就是文化求理解、政治少對(duì)立、經(jīng)濟(jì)促合作、外交謀協(xié)調(diào)和軍事避對(duì)抗。如若做到這些,中美關(guān)系就必定會(huì)相安無(wú)事、和諧共存。
[Abstract]:This paper regards Sino-US relations as a system, analyzes the history of Sino-US relations from the perspective of logical structure, finds useful experience and existing problems, and analyzes the influencing factors. To answer the question of conflict and confrontation is not the inevitable logic of Sino-US relations, and the theoretical prophecy of "political tragedy of great powers" is not necessarily the inevitable destination of Sino-US relations. Sino-US relations can completely build an internal logical structure that conforms to the fundamental interests of both sides and is conducive to world peace and development. Sino-U.S. relations are increasingly becoming the most important pair of bilateral relations between China and the United States. Moreover, the two countries have not yet achieved fundamental agreement on the connotation of the establishment of a new type of great power relationship, in the hope of providing some theoretical support and countermeasures. This paper applies the historical analysis method, combining with a large number of documents and historical facts. The inherent logical structure of Sino-US relations since the founding of the people's Republic of China has been divided into the hostile alienation structure under the serious Cold War mentality, the strategic integration structure under the relative political detente, and the reciprocal partnership structure for the comprehensive promotion of the political, economic and military forces. The structure of contact and containment under the precautionary thinking and the structure of cooperation and competition to deal with common threats are combed and analyzed, and on the basis of the objective and rational analysis of the main factors affecting the internal logical structure of Sino-US relations, This paper deduces the ideal internal logical structure of Sino-US relations by deductive reasoning, and puts forward and demonstrates the main path to construct this kind of ideal logical structure. Through the study, it is found that China and the United States are two great powers in the world. Despite its heterogeneity, problems of one kind or another, and even direct conflicts on the battlefield, there are elements that can coexist harmoniously, both historically and now and in the future, and have the basis for strategic cooperation. Conflict and confrontation are by no means the inevitable logic of great power relations. The Chinese and American peoples and leaders should have such wisdom and courage to make it a reality. As long as we abandon the Cold War mentality and transcend the zero-sum concept, On the premise of sound competition, we can fully seek common ground while reserving differences, borrow from each other, benefit from each other, and establish a mutually beneficial one that is not only in the vital interests of our country but also beneficial to the world. On the basis of mutual objective and rational cognition, the various fields are connected with each other. Therefore, the distance arrangement of balance, symmetry, harmony and unity can be achieved, that is, the internal logical structure relation of harmonious coexistence. As a concrete implementation path, we must: abandon the Cold War thinking and lay the road of benign competition and cooperation to win together; Expand economic cooperation and consolidate the basis for common development on interdependence; implement mutual respect, reduce and avoid friction and strategic conflicts; deepen seeking common ground while reserving differences; maintain regular strategic interaction between them; and improve mutual trust mechanisms. To ensure that there is no major strategic misreading; to expand areas of cooperation and increase the fruits of greater cooperation between the two sides. In short, cultural understanding, less political confrontation, economic cooperation, diplomatic coordination and military avoidance. Relations between China and the United States are bound to be peaceful and harmonious.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：上海師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號(hào)】：D822.371.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 楊守明;臺(tái)灣問(wèn)題與中美關(guān)系[J];安徽師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(人文社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2002年02期

2 周子光;;中美關(guān)系與臺(tái)灣問(wèn)題[J];承德民族師專學(xué)報(bào);2007年01期

3 王仲春;中美關(guān)系正�；M(jìn)程中的蘇聯(lián)因素(1969-1979)[J];黨的文獻(xiàn);2002年04期

4 張楊;;中國(guó)早期的空間發(fā)展與美國(guó)的因應(yīng)策略[J];東北師大學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2007年05期

5 巴殿君;;21世紀(jì)中美雙邊關(guān)系中的臺(tái)灣問(wèn)題[J];東北亞論壇;2007年05期

6 張家康;;毛澤東與尼克松——中美兩國(guó)關(guān)系正�；拈_拓者[J];黨史文匯;2007年05期

7 畢玉蓉;劉亞莉;;觀念背后的契合與碰撞——建構(gòu)主義視角下的中美關(guān)系與臺(tái)灣問(wèn)題[J];東南亞之窗;2006年02期

8 陶文釗;中美關(guān)系:半個(gè)世紀(jì)的啟示[J];當(dāng)代中國(guó)史研究;1999年Z1期

9 林利民;中美關(guān)系的過(guò)去、現(xiàn)在與未來(lái)[J];高師函授學(xué)刊;1994年01期

10 張磊;;首腦外交視角下的中美關(guān)系——基于冷戰(zhàn)后中美元首間外交的實(shí)證研究[J];國(guó)際觀察;2007年01期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前1條

1 北京大學(xué)中國(guó)戰(zhàn)略研究中心副研究員 胡波;[N];人民日?qǐng)?bào)海外版;2013年

，

本文編號(hào)：1503778