【摘要】：目的檢驗(yàn)中文版積極老齡量表(AAS)的信效度。方法按照Brislin翻譯模式將量表譯成中文版本,對(duì)350例老年人進(jìn)行問(wèn)卷調(diào)查,評(píng)定問(wèn)卷的信效度。結(jié)果中文版AAS保留36個(gè)條目,量表內(nèi)容效度指數(shù)(S-CVI/Ave,均值S-CVI)為1.00,主成分法提取7個(gè)公因子,累積貢獻(xiàn)率為66.234%。Cronbachα系數(shù)為0.932,各維度的Cronbachα系數(shù)在0.777~0.913。折半信度系數(shù)為0.823,各維度的折半系數(shù)在0.684~0.854。重測(cè)信度為0.725,各維度的重測(cè)信度均0.7。結(jié)論修訂后的AAS中文版符合心理學(xué)要求,具有良好的信、效度,適用于在中國(guó)老齡化背景下對(duì)老年人積極老齡狀況的測(cè)量和評(píng)價(jià)。
[Abstract]:Objective to test the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of active ageing scale (AAS). Methods according to the Brislin translation model, the questionnaire was translated into Chinese version, and the reliability and validity of the questionnaire were evaluated. Results 36 items were retained in the Chinese version of AAS, the mean S-CVI of the scale was 1.00, and 7 common factors were extracted by the principal component method. The cumulative contribution rate was 0.932, the 66.234%.Cronbach 偽 coefficient was 0.932, and the cumulative contribution rate was 0.932. The Cronbach 偽 coefficient of each dimension was 0.777and 0.913. The split-half reliability coefficient is 0.823, and the half-coefficient of each dimension is 0.684-0.854. The retest reliability was 0.725, and the retest reliability of each dimension was 0.7. Conclusion the revised Chinese version of AAS accords with the requirements of psychology and has good reliability and validity. It is suitable for the measurement and evaluation of the positive aging status of the elderly in the context of aging in China.
【作者單位】： 鄭州大學(xué)護(hù)理學(xué)院;
【基金】：河南推進(jìn)高成長(zhǎng)服務(wù)業(yè)大省建設(shè)的思路與對(duì)策研究資助項(xiàng)目(No.2014D007)
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：C913.6;R161.7
，

本文編號(hào)：2454871