發(fā)布時(shí)間：2019-03-21 09:00

【摘要】：處于快速轉(zhuǎn)型時(shí)期的當(dāng)前中國(guó)社會(huì),新情況,新問題不斷涌現(xiàn)。作為中國(guó)城市基層的基本單位,城市社區(qū)由原來單一的政府權(quán)力主體正日益地向政府、市場(chǎng)、社會(huì)和居民廣泛參與等多主體的治理體制轉(zhuǎn)變。社區(qū)治理已然成為中國(guó)創(chuàng)新社會(huì)管理新格局的關(guān)鍵。深圳市作為我國(guó)改革開放的前沿地帶,理應(yīng)成為社區(qū)治理創(chuàng)新的先導(dǎo)者。多年來,深圳市社區(qū)治理體制一直在進(jìn)行不斷地探索和變革,在不斷創(chuàng)新的過程中積累了許多有益的經(jīng)驗(yàn),如被國(guó)內(nèi)其他城市相繼借鑒的“鹽田模式”,“南山模式”,“桃源居善治模式”等。雖然深圳市在社區(qū)治理創(chuàng)新方面取得了一些成績(jī),但是由于政府職能轉(zhuǎn)變不到位,社區(qū)中介組織發(fā)育不足,社區(qū)居民利益訴求存在差別,社區(qū)居民參與社區(qū)治理的意識(shí)不強(qiáng)等因素的影響,導(dǎo)致深圳市社區(qū)治理創(chuàng)新面臨著自治趨勢(shì)與行政化現(xiàn)狀的矛盾,社區(qū)治理機(jī)制不健全,社區(qū)治理法制不完善,“條”“塊”矛盾使社區(qū)治理體制不順以及社區(qū)居委會(huì)角色錯(cuò)位等方面的困境。本文致力于就這些問題及引發(fā)這些問題的成因之研究,試圖在借鑒紐約、東京和新加坡等城市在社區(qū)治理方面所取得的成功經(jīng)驗(yàn)的基礎(chǔ)上,從培育社區(qū)治理的多元主體,建立健全社區(qū)治理的法規(guī)制度,培植社區(qū)治理的公共參與機(jī)制,理順社區(qū)治理體制,引入社區(qū)治理的市場(chǎng)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)機(jī)制等幾個(gè)方面出發(fā),對(duì)構(gòu)建深圳市社區(qū)多中心治理目標(biāo)模式的路徑選擇進(jìn)行了初步設(shè)想,期望深圳市社區(qū)治理創(chuàng)新更好地適應(yīng)本地經(jīng)濟(jì)社會(huì)的可持續(xù)發(fā)展,也為全國(guó)其他城市社區(qū)治理創(chuàng)新提供可資借鑒的有益經(jīng)驗(yàn)。
[Abstract]:In the rapid transition period of the current Chinese society, new conditions, new problems continue to emerge. As the basic unit of urban grass-roots in China, the urban community is changing from a single government power body to a multi-subject governance system, such as the government, the market, the society and the wide participation of the residents. Community governance has become the key to the new pattern of innovative social management in China. As the frontier of China's reform and opening-up, Shenzhen should be the leader of community governance innovation. Over the years, the community governance system in Shenzhen has been continuously explored and reformed, and many beneficial experiences have been accumulated in the process of continuous innovation, such as the "Yantian Model" and "Nanshan Model", which have been used for reference by other cities in the country one after another. "Taoyuan resident good governance model" and so on. Although Shenzhen has made some achievements in the innovation of community governance, because the transformation of government functions is not in place, the development of community intermediary organizations is insufficient, there are differences in the interests of community residents. The community residents' consciousness of participating in community governance is not strong, which leads to the contradiction between self-government trend and administrative situation in Shenzhen, the mechanism of community governance is not perfect, the legal system of community governance is not perfect, and the legal system of community governance is not perfect. The contradiction of "rule" and "block" makes the system of community governance not smooth and the role of neighborhood committee misplaced and so on. Based on the successful experience in community governance in New York, Tokyo and Singapore, this paper is devoted to the study of these problems and the causes of these problems, and tries to cultivate the pluralistic subjects of community governance on the basis of the successful experiences of cities such as New York, Tokyo and Singapore. We should establish and perfect the laws and regulations of community governance, cultivate the mechanism of public participation in community governance, straighten out the system of community governance, and introduce the market competition mechanism of community governance. The path selection of constructing the target model of community multi-center governance in Shenzhen is initially envisaged, and the innovation of community governance in Shenzhen is expected to better adapt to the sustainable development of local economy and society. It also provides useful experience for the innovation of community governance in other cities.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：湖南大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號(hào)】：C916

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 陳偉東;城市社區(qū)民主制度的創(chuàng)新[J];上海城市管理職業(yè)技術(shù)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2001年05期

2 李建國(guó);日本的城市社區(qū)管理模式——東京都中野區(qū)地域中心考察[J];城市問題;2000年03期

3 鄔大光,王建華;第三部門視野中的高等教育[J];高等教育研究;2002年02期

4 吳海燕;;社會(huì)轉(zhuǎn)型與城市社區(qū)多中心治理初探[J];湖州職業(yè)技術(shù)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2006年01期

5 李友梅;城市基層社會(huì)的深層權(quán)力秩序[J];江蘇社會(huì)科學(xué);2003年06期

6 黃立敏;;社會(huì)資本視閾下的“村改居”社區(qū)治理——以深圳市寶安區(qū)為例[J];江西社會(huì)科學(xué);2009年09期

7 徐君;;社區(qū)自治:城市基層社會(huì)管理的發(fā)展走向[J];國(guó)家行政學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2007年04期

8 肖劍忠;城市社區(qū)民主的制度建設(shè)[J];求實(shí);2002年04期

9 張文明;日本自治會(huì):真正的自治[J];社區(qū);2002年05期

10 王世軍 ,于吉軍;新加坡的社區(qū)組織與社區(qū)管理[J];社區(qū);2002年07期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 羅青青;轉(zhuǎn)型時(shí)期中國(guó)城市社區(qū)民間組織發(fā)展研究——以上海為例[D];華東師范大學(xué);2004年

，

本文編號(hào)：2444791