發(fā)布時(shí)間：2019-03-11 14:00

【摘要】：目的：本研究圍繞當(dāng)代中國(guó)人職業(yè)生涯不斷變化的趨勢(shì),試圖通過(guò)探索中國(guó)人職業(yè)適應(yīng)性人格結(jié)構(gòu),了解不同職業(yè)群體的職業(yè)適應(yīng)性人格特征,進(jìn)而對(duì)個(gè)體的職業(yè)規(guī)劃進(jìn)行指導(dǎo)。 方法：首先通過(guò)人格詞匯學(xué)方法,收集詞匯并編制職業(yè)適應(yīng)性人格詞匯表。進(jìn)一步將詞匯轉(zhuǎn)化為題目,然后編制成職業(yè)適應(yīng)性人格自評(píng)量表。在全國(guó)進(jìn)行大樣本調(diào)查,對(duì)獲取的3190個(gè)樣本數(shù)據(jù)進(jìn)行統(tǒng)計(jì)分析,獲得職業(yè)適應(yīng)性人格結(jié)構(gòu),建立常模并進(jìn)行信效度分析。最后對(duì)量表各因素人口學(xué)變量和職業(yè)變量進(jìn)行差異分析。 結(jié)果：1.通過(guò)對(duì)3190份有效量表因素分析,獲得7個(gè)因素含60個(gè)項(xiàng)目組成的職業(yè)適應(yīng)性自評(píng)量表。2.量表各因素的重測(cè)信度系數(shù)在0.706-0.931之間(p0.01),內(nèi)部一致性系數(shù)在0.737-0.915之間。3.量表的7個(gè)因素與艾森克人格評(píng)定量表(EPQ-RSC)的4個(gè)因素除個(gè)別相關(guān)不顯著外,其余因素皆存在顯著相關(guān)(p0.05)。量表的7個(gè)因素與霍蘭德職業(yè)傾向量表修訂版(SDS)大部分維度呈現(xiàn)顯著相關(guān)(p0.05)。4.兩性被試的職業(yè)適應(yīng)性人格因素比較結(jié)果：在創(chuàng)新性、情緒穩(wěn)定性、人際關(guān)系性上沒(méi)有顯著差異；在外向性、誠(chéng)信性堅(jiān)持性和傳統(tǒng)性上存在顯著差異(p0.05)。5.不同年齡階段被試在情緒穩(wěn)定性、誠(chéng)信性、人際關(guān)系性、堅(jiān)持性和傳統(tǒng)性上存在較顯著差異(p0.01)；在創(chuàng)新性、外向性上沒(méi)有顯著差異。6.不同居住地被試除了在情緒穩(wěn)定性上沒(méi)有顯著差異外,其余因素都存在顯著差異(p0.05)。7.不同職業(yè)群體在7個(gè)因素中都存在顯著差異(p0.05)。 結(jié)論：1.中國(guó)人具有一個(gè)相對(duì)穩(wěn)定的7維度職業(yè)適應(yīng)性人格結(jié)構(gòu)。2.中國(guó)職業(yè)適應(yīng)性人格結(jié)構(gòu)的7個(gè)維度分別為：創(chuàng)新性、情緒穩(wěn)定性、外向性、誠(chéng)信性、人際關(guān)系性、堅(jiān)持性和傳統(tǒng)性。3..新編制的職業(yè)適應(yīng)性人格問(wèn)卷有較好的信度和效度,進(jìn)一步標(biāo)準(zhǔn)化后可以運(yùn)用于職業(yè)咨詢(xún),職業(yè)指導(dǎo)和人才選拔。4.不同被試群體在不同的人格因素上存在不同的差異。
[Abstract]:Objective: based on the changing trend of contemporary Chinese career, this study attempts to understand the personality characteristics of different occupational groups by exploring the structure of occupational adaptive personality of Chinese people, and trying to find out the characteristics of occupational adaptive personality of different occupational groups in China. And then guide the individual career planning. Methods: by means of personality lexicology, vocabulary was collected and occupational adaptive personality vocabulary was compiled. The vocabulary was further transformed into a topic, and then the self-rating scale of occupational adaptive personality was compiled. A large sample survey was carried out in China. 3190 samples were collected and analyzed statistically to obtain the occupational adaptive personality structure, to establish the norm and to analyze the reliability and validity. Finally, the differences between demographic variables and occupational variables of the scale were analyzed. Results: 1. Based on the analysis of 3190 factors of the effective scale, the self-rating scale of occupational adaptability with 7 factors and 60 items was obtained. The test-retest reliability coefficient of each factor of the scale was between 0.706 and 0.931 (p0.01), and the internal consistency coefficient was between 0.737 and 0.915. There were significant correlations between the seven factors of the scale and the four factors of the Eysenck Personality rating scale (EPQ-RSC) except for individual factors (p0.05). There was a significant correlation between the 7 factors of the scale and most of the dimensions of (SDS) in the revised version of Hollander Occupational orientation scale (p0.05). The results showed that there were no significant differences in innovation, emotional stability and interpersonal relationship between male and female subjects, while there were significant differences in extroversion, honesty persistence and tradition (p0.05). There were significant differences in emotional stability, honesty, interpersonal relationship, persistence and tradition between different age groups (p0.01), but no significant difference in innovation and extroversion. 6. Except for no significant difference in emotional stability among different places of residence, there were significant differences in other factors (p0.05). There were significant differences among 7 factors among different occupational groups (p0.05). Conclusion: 1. Chinese people have a relatively stable 7-dimensional occupational adaptive personality structure. 2. The seven dimensions of Chinese occupational adaptive personality structure are: innovation, emotional stability, extroversion, honesty, interpersonal relationship, persistence and tradition. The newly compiled occupational adaptive personality questionnaire has good reliability and validity, and can be applied to career counseling, career guidance and talent selection after further standardization. 4. Different subjects had different personality factors.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：鄭州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：C913.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

中國(guó)期刊全文數(shù)據(jù)庫(kù) 前10條

1 王登峰,崔紅;文化、語(yǔ)言、人格結(jié)構(gòu)[J];北京大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2000年04期

2 王登峰,崔紅;中西方人格結(jié)構(gòu)的理論和實(shí)證比較[J];北京大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2003年05期

3 敖小蘭,石竹屏;心理學(xué)中人格評(píng)估法綜述[J];重慶交通學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2004年02期

4 沈漪文;;西方職業(yè)發(fā)展的理論綜述[J];產(chǎn)業(yè)與科技論壇;2008年08期

5 吳冬梅;;西方職業(yè)測(cè)評(píng)理論綜述[J];當(dāng)代財(cái)經(jīng);2007年12期

6 廖全明;;對(duì)中國(guó)人人格結(jié)構(gòu)模型研究的評(píng)價(jià)與反思[J];涪陵師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2007年02期

7 田燕秋;論職業(yè)的適應(yīng)性[J];廣西民族學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);1999年S1期

8 劉繪珍;彭澎;羅燕君;;企業(yè)管理人員的職業(yè)適應(yīng)性系統(tǒng)評(píng)價(jià)[J];工業(yè)安全與環(huán)保;2008年07期

9 呂國(guó)富;;霍蘭德人格類(lèi)型理論與大學(xué)生職業(yè)生涯輔導(dǎo)[J];貴州師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2007年04期

10 鄭丹丹,雷洪;三峽移民社會(huì)適應(yīng)中的主觀(guān)能動(dòng)性[J];華中科技大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(人文社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2002年03期

，

本文編號(hào)：2438335