當代中國人職業(yè)適應性人格結構初探
發(fā)布時間：2019-03-11 14:00
【摘要】：目的：本研究圍繞當代中國人職業(yè)生涯不斷變化的趨勢,試圖通過探索中國人職業(yè)適應性人格結構,了解不同職業(yè)群體的職業(yè)適應性人格特征,進而對個體的職業(yè)規(guī)劃進行指導。 方法：首先通過人格詞匯學方法,收集詞匯并編制職業(yè)適應性人格詞匯表。進一步將詞匯轉化為題目,然后編制成職業(yè)適應性人格自評量表。在全國進行大樣本調查,對獲取的3190個樣本數(shù)據(jù)進行統(tǒng)計分析,獲得職業(yè)適應性人格結構,建立常模并進行信效度分析。最后對量表各因素人口學變量和職業(yè)變量進行差異分析。 結果：1.通過對3190份有效量表因素分析,獲得7個因素含60個項目組成的職業(yè)適應性自評量表。2.量表各因素的重測信度系數(shù)在0.706-0.931之間(p0.01),內部一致性系數(shù)在0.737-0.915之間。3.量表的7個因素與艾森克人格評定量表(EPQ-RSC)的4個因素除個別相關不顯著外,其余因素皆存在顯著相關(p0.05)。量表的7個因素與霍蘭德職業(yè)傾向量表修訂版(SDS)大部分維度呈現(xiàn)顯著相關(p0.05)。4.兩性被試的職業(yè)適應性人格因素比較結果：在創(chuàng)新性、情緒穩(wěn)定性、人際關系性上沒有顯著差異；在外向性、誠信性堅持性和傳統(tǒng)性上存在顯著差異(p0.05)。5.不同年齡階段被試在情緒穩(wěn)定性、誠信性、人際關系性、堅持性和傳統(tǒng)性上存在較顯著差異(p0.01)；在創(chuàng)新性、外向性上沒有顯著差異。6.不同居住地被試除了在情緒穩(wěn)定性上沒有顯著差異外,其余因素都存在顯著差異(p0.05)。7.不同職業(yè)群體在7個因素中都存在顯著差異(p0.05)。 結論：1.中國人具有一個相對穩(wěn)定的7維度職業(yè)適應性人格結構。2.中國職業(yè)適應性人格結構的7個維度分別為：創(chuàng)新性、情緒穩(wěn)定性、外向性、誠信性、人際關系性、堅持性和傳統(tǒng)性。3..新編制的職業(yè)適應性人格問卷有較好的信度和效度,進一步標準化后可以運用于職業(yè)咨詢,職業(yè)指導和人才選拔。4.不同被試群體在不同的人格因素上存在不同的差異。
[Abstract]:Objective: based on the changing trend of contemporary Chinese career, this study attempts to understand the personality characteristics of different occupational groups by exploring the structure of occupational adaptive personality of Chinese people, and trying to find out the characteristics of occupational adaptive personality of different occupational groups in China. And then guide the individual career planning. Methods: by means of personality lexicology, vocabulary was collected and occupational adaptive personality vocabulary was compiled. The vocabulary was further transformed into a topic, and then the self-rating scale of occupational adaptive personality was compiled. A large sample survey was carried out in China. 3190 samples were collected and analyzed statistically to obtain the occupational adaptive personality structure, to establish the norm and to analyze the reliability and validity. Finally, the differences between demographic variables and occupational variables of the scale were analyzed. Results: 1. Based on the analysis of 3190 factors of the effective scale, the self-rating scale of occupational adaptability with 7 factors and 60 items was obtained. The test-retest reliability coefficient of each factor of the scale was between 0.706 and 0.931 (p0.01), and the internal consistency coefficient was between 0.737 and 0.915. There were significant correlations between the seven factors of the scale and the four factors of the Eysenck Personality rating scale (EPQ-RSC) except for individual factors (p0.05). There was a significant correlation between the 7 factors of the scale and most of the dimensions of (SDS) in the revised version of Hollander Occupational orientation scale (p0.05). The results showed that there were no significant differences in innovation, emotional stability and interpersonal relationship between male and female subjects, while there were significant differences in extroversion, honesty persistence and tradition (p0.05). There were significant differences in emotional stability, honesty, interpersonal relationship, persistence and tradition between different age groups (p0.01), but no significant difference in innovation and extroversion. 6. Except for no significant difference in emotional stability among different places of residence, there were significant differences in other factors (p0.05). There were significant differences among 7 factors among different occupational groups (p0.05). Conclusion: 1. Chinese people have a relatively stable 7-dimensional occupational adaptive personality structure. 2. The seven dimensions of Chinese occupational adaptive personality structure are: innovation, emotional stability, extroversion, honesty, interpersonal relationship, persistence and tradition. The newly compiled occupational adaptive personality questionnaire has good reliability and validity, and can be applied to career counseling, career guidance and talent selection after further standardization. 4. Different subjects had different personality factors.
【學位授予單位】：鄭州大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2011
【分類號】：C913.2
本文編號：2438335
[Abstract]:Objective: based on the changing trend of contemporary Chinese career, this study attempts to understand the personality characteristics of different occupational groups by exploring the structure of occupational adaptive personality of Chinese people, and trying to find out the characteristics of occupational adaptive personality of different occupational groups in China. And then guide the individual career planning. Methods: by means of personality lexicology, vocabulary was collected and occupational adaptive personality vocabulary was compiled. The vocabulary was further transformed into a topic, and then the self-rating scale of occupational adaptive personality was compiled. A large sample survey was carried out in China. 3190 samples were collected and analyzed statistically to obtain the occupational adaptive personality structure, to establish the norm and to analyze the reliability and validity. Finally, the differences between demographic variables and occupational variables of the scale were analyzed. Results: 1. Based on the analysis of 3190 factors of the effective scale, the self-rating scale of occupational adaptability with 7 factors and 60 items was obtained. The test-retest reliability coefficient of each factor of the scale was between 0.706 and 0.931 (p0.01), and the internal consistency coefficient was between 0.737 and 0.915. There were significant correlations between the seven factors of the scale and the four factors of the Eysenck Personality rating scale (EPQ-RSC) except for individual factors (p0.05). There was a significant correlation between the 7 factors of the scale and most of the dimensions of (SDS) in the revised version of Hollander Occupational orientation scale (p0.05). The results showed that there were no significant differences in innovation, emotional stability and interpersonal relationship between male and female subjects, while there were significant differences in extroversion, honesty persistence and tradition (p0.05). There were significant differences in emotional stability, honesty, interpersonal relationship, persistence and tradition between different age groups (p0.01), but no significant difference in innovation and extroversion. 6. Except for no significant difference in emotional stability among different places of residence, there were significant differences in other factors (p0.05). There were significant differences among 7 factors among different occupational groups (p0.05). Conclusion: 1. Chinese people have a relatively stable 7-dimensional occupational adaptive personality structure. 2. The seven dimensions of Chinese occupational adaptive personality structure are: innovation, emotional stability, extroversion, honesty, interpersonal relationship, persistence and tradition. The newly compiled occupational adaptive personality questionnaire has good reliability and validity, and can be applied to career counseling, career guidance and talent selection after further standardization. 4. Different subjects had different personality factors.
【學位授予單位】：鄭州大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2011
【分類號】：C913.2
【參考文獻】
中國期刊全文數(shù)據(jù)庫 前10條
1 王登峰,崔紅;文化、語言、人格結構[J];北京大學學報(哲學社會科學版);2000年04期
2 王登峰,崔紅;中西方人格結構的理論和實證比較[J];北京大學學報(哲學社會科學版);2003年05期
3 敖小蘭,石竹屏;心理學中人格評估法綜述[J];重慶交通學院學報(社會科學版);2004年02期
4 沈漪文;;西方職業(yè)發(fā)展的理論綜述[J];產業(yè)與科技論壇;2008年08期
5 吳冬梅;;西方職業(yè)測評理論綜述[J];當代財經;2007年12期
6 廖全明;;對中國人人格結構模型研究的評價與反思[J];涪陵師范學院學報;2007年02期
7 田燕秋;論職業(yè)的適應性[J];廣西民族學院學報(哲學社會科學版);1999年S1期
8 劉繪珍;彭澎;羅燕君;;企業(yè)管理人員的職業(yè)適應性系統(tǒng)評價[J];工業(yè)安全與環(huán)保;2008年07期
9 呂國富;;霍蘭德人格類型理論與大學生職業(yè)生涯輔導[J];貴州師范大學學報(社會科學版);2007年04期
10 鄭丹丹,雷洪;三峽移民社會適應中的主觀能動性[J];華中科技大學學報(人文社會科學版);2002年03期
，本文編號：2438335
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/shekelunwen/shgj/2438335.html
