生活質(zhì)量測(cè)量領(lǐng)域的金三角
發(fā)布時(shí)間：2019-01-03 06:27
【摘要】：生活質(zhì)量存在于兩個(gè)相互獨(dú)立的領(lǐng)域,一個(gè)是客觀性領(lǐng)域,很多人都基本可以證實(shí)同一結(jié)果,另一個(gè)是主觀性領(lǐng)域,由不同個(gè)體體驗(yàn)的情感組成。本文關(guān)注主觀性領(lǐng)域、主觀福祉動(dòng)態(tài)平衡理論和測(cè)量問(wèn)題。經(jīng)驗(yàn)性檢測(cè)需要依靠有效可信的數(shù)據(jù),人們使用最多的測(cè)量手段是以領(lǐng)域?yàn)閱挝弧⒁纼蓚�(gè)重要原則建構(gòu)的。一是不論殘障與否,測(cè)量工具適用于所有人,確保判斷生活質(zhì)量的標(biāo)準(zhǔn)普遍適用。二是測(cè)量工具應(yīng)力求簡(jiǎn)約,因?yàn)闈撛陬I(lǐng)域數(shù)量可能極其可觀,所以人們?cè)跊Q定領(lǐng)域取舍時(shí)應(yīng)嚴(yán)格使用標(biāo)準(zhǔn)。個(gè)人福祉指數(shù)就符合上述原則。個(gè)人福祉指數(shù)的建構(gòu)源自"對(duì)生活總體滿(mǎn)意"初級(jí)層次的拆解。金錢(qián)、人際關(guān)系和成就感所形成的"金三角"體現(xiàn)出殘障者和非殘障者獲得資源支持的關(guān)鍵。因此,為了有助于將主觀福祉維持在正常水準(zhǔn),我們需要針對(duì)上述三個(gè)領(lǐng)域提供服務(wù)。
[Abstract]:The quality of life exists in two independent fields, one is the objective field, many people can basically prove the same result, the other is the subjective field, which is composed of different emotions of individual experience. This paper focuses on subjective field, dynamic balance theory and measurement of subjective well-being. Empirical testing depends on effective and reliable data. The most commonly used measurement methods are based on two important principles. The first is that measuring tools apply to all people, regardless of disability, to ensure that quality of life standards are universally applicable. Second, the measurement tools should be minimalist, because the number of potential fields may be extremely substantial, so people should strictly use the criteria in deciding the choice of the field. The personal Well-being Index is in line with the above principles. The construction of personal well-being index originates from the disassembly of the primary level of overall satisfaction with life. The golden triangle of money, relationships, and a sense of achievement reflects the key to resource support for the disabled and the non-disabled. Therefore, in order to help maintain subjective well-being at normal levels, we need to provide services in these three areas.
【作者單位】： 澳大利亞迪肯大學(xué);悉尼大學(xué)醫(yī)學(xué)院殘障研究中心;
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：C913.69
，
本文編號(hào)：2399008
[Abstract]:The quality of life exists in two independent fields, one is the objective field, many people can basically prove the same result, the other is the subjective field, which is composed of different emotions of individual experience. This paper focuses on subjective field, dynamic balance theory and measurement of subjective well-being. Empirical testing depends on effective and reliable data. The most commonly used measurement methods are based on two important principles. The first is that measuring tools apply to all people, regardless of disability, to ensure that quality of life standards are universally applicable. Second, the measurement tools should be minimalist, because the number of potential fields may be extremely substantial, so people should strictly use the criteria in deciding the choice of the field. The personal Well-being Index is in line with the above principles. The construction of personal well-being index originates from the disassembly of the primary level of overall satisfaction with life. The golden triangle of money, relationships, and a sense of achievement reflects the key to resource support for the disabled and the non-disabled. Therefore, in order to help maintain subjective well-being at normal levels, we need to provide services in these three areas.
【作者單位】： 澳大利亞迪肯大學(xué);悉尼大學(xué)醫(yī)學(xué)院殘障研究中心;
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：C913.69
，
本文編號(hào)：2399008
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/shekelunwen/shgj/2399008.html
最近更新
教材專(zhuān)著
