古典進(jìn)化論與“地域組織標(biāo)志說”的終結(jié)
發(fā)布時(shí)間：2019-01-01 08:27
【摘要】：作為摩爾根古代社會理論的重要組成部分,"地域組織標(biāo)志說"對19世紀(jì)后半期以來人類學(xué)、歷史學(xué)領(lǐng)域的相關(guān)研究產(chǎn)生了深遠(yuǎn)影響。然而從20世紀(jì)初開始,大量人類學(xué)材料和歷史學(xué)研究成果的涌現(xiàn)對"地域組織標(biāo)志說"的科學(xué)性和解釋力提出嚴(yán)峻挑戰(zhàn),使得這一學(xué)說在事實(shí)上已經(jīng)處于終結(jié)狀態(tài)。從學(xué)科理論與方法論角度看,"地域組織標(biāo)志說"之所以未能經(jīng)得起時(shí)間的檢驗(yàn),與古典進(jìn)化論的"文化平行說""單線進(jìn)化說"以及簡單化的"比較研究法"直接相關(guān)。有些中國學(xué)者之所以不愿意接受"地域組織標(biāo)志說"已經(jīng)終結(jié)的事實(shí),是因?yàn)樗麄冞^高估計(jì)了進(jìn)化論在解釋人類歷史方面的價(jià)值,并且未能在古典進(jìn)化論與馬克思主義理論之間做出必要的區(qū)分。
[Abstract]:As an important part of Morgen's ancient social theory, the theory of regional organization mark has had a profound influence on the research of anthropology and history since the second half of the 19th century. However, since the beginning of the 20th century, the emergence of a large number of anthropological materials and historical research results has posed a severe challenge to the scientific nature and explanatory power of the "regional organization mark theory", which has made the theory in fact in the end. From the point of view of discipline theory and methodology, the reason why "regional organization mark theory" can not stand the test of time is directly related to the "cultural parallel theory" and "single-line evolution theory" of classical evolution theory and the simplified "comparative research method". Some Chinese scholars are reluctant to accept the fact that the "geographical organization mark" is over because they overestimate the value of evolution in interpreting human history. And failed to make the necessary distinction between classical evolution and Marxist theory.
【作者單位】： 中國社會科學(xué)雜志社;
【分類號】：C912.4
本文編號：2397277
[Abstract]:As an important part of Morgen's ancient social theory, the theory of regional organization mark has had a profound influence on the research of anthropology and history since the second half of the 19th century. However, since the beginning of the 20th century, the emergence of a large number of anthropological materials and historical research results has posed a severe challenge to the scientific nature and explanatory power of the "regional organization mark theory", which has made the theory in fact in the end. From the point of view of discipline theory and methodology, the reason why "regional organization mark theory" can not stand the test of time is directly related to the "cultural parallel theory" and "single-line evolution theory" of classical evolution theory and the simplified "comparative research method". Some Chinese scholars are reluctant to accept the fact that the "geographical organization mark" is over because they overestimate the value of evolution in interpreting human history. And failed to make the necessary distinction between classical evolution and Marxist theory.
【作者單位】： 中國社會科學(xué)雜志社;
【分類號】：C912.4
【相似文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前6條
1 郝孚逸;;由“狼圖騰”的爭議想起摩爾根的《古代社會》[J];湖北社會科學(xué);2005年12期
2 李永偉;;一種氏族民主制與兩種人類文明——路易斯·亨利·摩爾根《古代社會》讀后存疑[J];新余高專學(xué)報(bào);2009年01期
3 袁長庚;張海洋;;闡舊邦以輔新命——重讀L·H·摩爾根的《古代社會》[J];湖北民族學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2008年03期
4 徐國棟;;家庭、國家和方法論:現(xiàn)代學(xué)者對摩爾根、恩格斯——對《古代社會》、《家庭、私有制和國家的起源》之批評百年綜述[J];法律文化研究;2006年00期
5 Ю·П·阿維爾基耶娃;李毅夫;;現(xiàn)代民族學(xué)源流(為紀(jì)念摩爾根《古代社會》發(fā)表一百周年而作)[J];民族譯叢;1979年02期
6 D·查托帕德雅雅;魏治臻;;《古代社會》導(dǎo)論(下)[J];民族譯叢;1987年03期
，本文編號：2397277
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/shekelunwen/shgj/2397277.html
最近更新
教材專著
