【摘要】：本文利用CGSS2006家庭卷數(shù)據(jù)考察了中國(guó)城市成年子女對(duì)父母提供代際支持的階層差異。并檢驗(yàn)資源限制論、投資回報(bào)論和價(jià)值觀理論對(duì)階層差異的解釋力。采用次序?qū)?shù)比率模型(Ordinal Logit Model)對(duì)數(shù)據(jù)進(jìn)行擬合,研究結(jié)果發(fā)現(xiàn)：本人社會(huì)階層地位越高,越有可能為父代提供經(jīng)濟(jì)支持；老中產(chǎn)階層比工人階層和新中產(chǎn)階層更少為父母提供日常照料支持和情感支持；父親社會(huì)階層地位越高,成年子女更有可能為父母提供情感支持。資源限制論部分地解釋了階層間經(jīng)濟(jì)支持差異；而投資回報(bào)論很好地解釋了父代社會(huì)階層和成年子女為父母提供情感支持的差異。價(jià)值觀理論沒有得到很好的驗(yàn)證。
[Abstract]:In this paper, CGSS2006 family volume data are used to investigate the class differences of intergenerational support provided by adult children to their parents in urban China. It also examines the explanatory power of resource restriction theory, return on investment theory and value theory on stratum differences. The (Ordinal Logit Model) model is used to fit the data. The results show that the higher the social stratum, the more likely it is to provide economic support for the father; The older middle class provides less daily care support and emotional support to parents than the working class and the new middle class; the higher the status of father, the more likely adult children are to provide emotional support to parents. The theory of resource limitation partly explains the difference of economic support among strata, while the theory of return on investment explains the difference between parent social stratum and adult children in providing emotional support to their parents. The theory of values is not well tested.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：復(fù)旦大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號(hào)】：C913.5

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 石曉梅;;買房之前細(xì)算計(jì)[J];健康生活;2006年01期

2 辛巖;家庭教育支出有潛力——訪北京大學(xué)陳良q教授[J];中小學(xué)管理;1993年02期

3 ;家庭省錢的四不原則[J];家教博覽;2002年09期

4 眾集;;14項(xiàng)收入,納入家庭收入[J];溫州w，

本文編號(hào)：2392377