【摘要】：對于中國人而言，家向來不是一個固定的概念，，甚至沒有一個固定的形態(tài)。而由于社會的變遷，不同時期人們心目中的“家”必然也不盡相同。在家的觀念和形態(tài)隨著時間推移在代際間不斷地發(fā)生變化的同時，家庭中性別的權利作用機制也同時發(fā)生著演變。因此，筆者嘗試以代際比較的視角，對新中國成立以來，城市中不同代際間人們觀念中的“家”，他們的婚姻關系網(wǎng)絡，以及三代人家庭中男權作用機制的演變進行研究。 筆者通過對新中國建國以來的家及其社會關系網(wǎng)絡的代際比較，一方面，增加關于家的實地研究；另一方面，將家置于社會變遷和社會關系網(wǎng)中思考，使人們更理性的看待家庭。 本文采用的研究方法有文獻法、訪談法和觀察法。通過對各種文獻包括學術和文學作品的閱讀和研究，歸納和總結與本論文研究相關的問題，比較不同視角下的研究狀況，了解各個時代背景，和本研究領域當前的研究現(xiàn)狀，為本研究提供參考價值。在訪談中，筆者尤其注重對同一個大家庭三代小家庭各自的深度訪談。以此來對比不同代際間家與社會關系的連帶，尋找時代在家上刻下的烙印。 通過訪談研究筆者發(fā)現(xiàn)，不同代際間的家確實發(fā)生了一些變化。其一，家的范圍隨著時間的推移在代際間不斷的縮小，每一代的家庭模式存在一定的差異；其二，社會關系網(wǎng)中血緣親屬的作用不斷的弱化，人們的婚姻關系網(wǎng)絡的范圍不斷擴大；其三，男權在這三代家庭中的作用機制也在發(fā)生著演變，家庭權利模式從不完全的合作制逐漸向成熟的合作制轉變。但是，作為一個古已有之的社會設置，家庭相對于其他的社會制度而言具有相對的穩(wěn)定性。家的一些基本特征并沒有隨著時間的推移和社會的變遷而發(fā)生改變，如家的基本功能及家的基本構成要素等。
[Abstract]:For the Chinese, home has never been a fixed concept, or even a fixed form. Due to social changes, people in different periods of the "home" must be different. As the concepts and patterns of home change from generation to generation, the mechanism of gender rights in the family is also evolving at the same time. Therefore, from the perspective of intergenerational comparison, the author attempts to study the "home", the network of marriage relations and the evolution of the mechanism of male power in three generations of families in different generations of cities since the founding of New China. Through the intergenerational comparison of the family and its social network since the founding of the people's Republic of China, the author, on the one hand, increases the field study of the home, on the other hand, puts the family in the context of social change and social network. To make people more rational about the family. The research methods used in this paper are literature method, interview method and observation method. Through the reading and research of various literature, including academic and literary works, this paper summarizes and summarizes the problems related to the study of this paper, compares the research situation from different angles of view, understands the background of each era, and the current research situation in this research field. To provide reference value for this study. In the interview, the author pays particular attention to the three generations of the same extended family. This is to compare the intergenerational family and social relations, and to look for the imprint of the times at home. The author finds that some changes have taken place in different generations of homes. First, the scope of the family has been shrinking over time, and there are certain differences in the family patterns of each generation. Second, the role of blood relatives in the social network is constantly weakening. Third, the mechanism of male power in the three generations of families is also evolving, and the mode of family rights has gradually changed from incomplete cooperative system to mature cooperative system. However, as an ancient social setup, the family is relatively stable relative to other social systems. Some of the basic characteristics of the home have not changed with the passage of time and social changes, such as the basic functions of the home and the basic elements of the home, and so on.
【學位授予單位】：沈陽師范大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：C913.11

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 王思斌;經(jīng)濟體制改革對農村社會關系的影響[J];北京大學學報(哲學社會科學版);1987年03期

2 左際平;;從婚姻歷程看中國傳統(tǒng)社會中家庭男權的復雜性[J];婦女研究論叢;2012年03期

3 王躍生;;個體家庭、網(wǎng)絡家庭和親屬圈家庭分析——歷史與現(xiàn)實相結合的視角[J];開放時代;2010年04期

4 李相珍;“文革”期間婚姻生活之我見[J];遼寧大學學報(哲學社會科學版);2002年03期

5 高清;;改革開放以來我國家庭的變遷與發(fā)展[J];攀登;2005年06期

6 李樹茁,Marcus W.Feldman;略陽縣兩類招贅婚姻類型的決定因素研究[J];人口研究;2002年01期

7 劉英;京津滬寧蓉五城市家庭調查初析[J];社會學研究;1986年04期

8 譚深;城市“單位保障”的形成及特點[J];社會學研究;1991年05期

9 李io;家庭政策與社會變遷中的中國家庭[J];社會學研究;1991年05期

10 張永健;家庭與社會變遷——當代西方家庭史研究的新動向[J];社會學研究;1993年02期

本文編號：2216174