本文選題：去個(gè)性化的社會(huì)認(rèn)同模型 + 社會(huì)認(rèn)同　； 參考：《湖南師范大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文

【摘要】：隨著科技的飛速發(fā)展,人們的生活范圍已經(jīng)不再局限于現(xiàn)實(shí)世界當(dāng)中,網(wǎng)絡(luò)現(xiàn)在已儼然成為人們社會(huì)生活的重要場(chǎng)所。雖然網(wǎng)絡(luò)是虛擬的世界,但是,網(wǎng)絡(luò)中也有著和現(xiàn)實(shí)世界相同的群體心理現(xiàn)象,群體極化就是其中的一種。而且,由于群體極化,網(wǎng)民對(duì)于一些熱點(diǎn)事件的極端觀點(diǎn)也造成了很多不良的影響。因此,網(wǎng)絡(luò)群體極化這種心理現(xiàn)象是值得我們重視和研究的。 關(guān)于群體極化,現(xiàn)有的理論解釋主要有：社會(huì)比較理論、爭(zhēng)論與說服理論和去個(gè)性化的社會(huì)認(rèn)同模型,但是,能凸顯網(wǎng)絡(luò)的匿名性,并且相關(guān)研究已延伸到網(wǎng)絡(luò)范疇的,就只有去個(gè)性化的社會(huì)認(rèn)同模型。而且,尚無研究在中國文化背景下驗(yàn)證去個(gè)性化的社會(huì)認(rèn)同模型,因此,實(shí)驗(yàn)一將以Lea和Spear的范式為基礎(chǔ),考察社會(huì)認(rèn)同和匿名性對(duì)中國被試網(wǎng)絡(luò)群體極化的影響。 另外,由于在實(shí)際操作中,網(wǎng)絡(luò)實(shí)名制還存在一定困難和爭(zhēng)議,同時(shí),責(zé)任分散即是去個(gè)性化操作的一種,也是影響群體極化的因素之一,因此,實(shí)驗(yàn)二在去個(gè)性化的社會(huì)認(rèn)同模型基礎(chǔ)上,考察了社會(huì)認(rèn)同和責(zé)任分散對(duì)網(wǎng)絡(luò)群體極化的影響。 本研究的結(jié)論是： (1)、社會(huì)認(rèn)同和匿名性之間有著交互作用,共同影響網(wǎng)絡(luò)群體極化,并且,匿名對(duì)網(wǎng)絡(luò)群體極化的作用受到社會(huì)認(rèn)同的影響。 (2)、一般情況下,網(wǎng)絡(luò)實(shí)名制的確可以起到抑制網(wǎng)絡(luò)群體極化的作用,但是,在群體認(rèn)同顯著的情況下,匿名與否對(duì)網(wǎng)絡(luò)群體極化沒有影響。 (3)、社會(huì)認(rèn)同和責(zé)任分散之間有這交互作用,共同影響網(wǎng)絡(luò)群體極化,并且,責(zé)任分散對(duì)網(wǎng)絡(luò)群體極化的作用受到社會(huì)認(rèn)同的影響。 (4)、在現(xiàn)實(shí)生活中,通過操縱責(zé)任分散可以啟到抑制網(wǎng)絡(luò)群體極化的作用。因?yàn)?在群體認(rèn)同顯著的條件下,責(zé)任分散個(gè)體的極化要大于非責(zé)任分散的個(gè)體。
[Abstract]:With the rapid development of science and technology, the scope of people's life is no longer confined to the real world, the network has become an important place for people's social life. Although the network is a virtual world, there are the same group psychological phenomena in the network as in the real world, and group polarization is one of them. Moreover, due to group polarization, the extreme views of netizens on some hot issues have also caused a lot of adverse effects. Therefore, the psychological phenomenon of network group polarization is worthy of our attention and research. On group polarization, the existing theoretical explanations include: social comparison theory, argument and persuasion theory and depersonalization model of social identity. However, it can highlight the anonymity of the network, and the related research has been extended to the category of the network. There is only a depersonalization model of social identity. Moreover, there is no research to verify the depersonalization model of social identity in Chinese cultural background. Therefore, experiment 1 will examine the influence of social identity and anonymity on the population polarization of Chinese subjects' network based on the paradigm of Lea and Spear. In addition, in practice, there are still some difficulties and controversies in the network real-name system. At the same time, the decentralization of responsibility is not only a kind of de-individualized operation, but also one of the factors that affect the group polarization. On the basis of depersonalization social identity model, experiment 2 investigates the influence of social identity and responsibility dispersion on network population polarization. The conclusions of this study are as follows: There is interaction between social identity and anonymity, which influences the polarization of network group together, and the effect of anonymity on the polarization of network group is influenced by social identity. Generally speaking, the real name system can inhibit the polarization of the network group, but in the case of significant group identity, anonymity has no effect on the polarization of the network group. The interaction between social identity and responsibility dispersion affects the polarization of network group together, and the role of responsibility decentralization on network group polarization is affected by social identity. In real life, the decentralization of manipulation responsibility can inhibit the polarization of network groups. Because, under the condition of significant group identity, the polarization of the responsible decentralized individual is greater than that of the non-responsible decentralized individual.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：湖南師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號(hào)】：C912

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前7條

1 吳蘭花;跨文化心理學(xué)中個(gè)人主義和集體主義研究概述[J];湖南第一師范學(xué)報(bào);2003年01期

2 韋義平;試述社會(huì)作用力理論及其教育應(yīng)用[J];廣西師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);1994年03期

3 李春;宮秀麗;;自我分類理論概述[J];山東師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(人文社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2006年03期

4 李紅霞;張海鐘;;個(gè)體主義和集體主義的跨文化心理學(xué)研究述評(píng)[J];社會(huì)工作下半月(理論);2009年06期

5 謝天;鄭全全;陳華嬌;;以計(jì)算機(jī)為媒介的溝通對(duì)人際交流關(guān)系的影響[J];心理科學(xué);2009年01期

6 張瑩瑞;佐斌;;社會(huì)認(rèn)同理論及其發(fā)展[J];心理科學(xué)進(jìn)展;2006年03期

7 蘭玉娟;佐斌;;去個(gè)性化效應(yīng)的社會(huì)認(rèn)同模型[J];心理科學(xué)進(jìn)展;2009年02期

，

本文編號(hào)：1942463