本文選題：家庭暴力 + 育齡期婦女��； 參考：《山東大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文

【摘要】：[研究背景] 家庭暴力是指對(duì)家庭成員進(jìn)行傷害、折磨、摧殘和壓迫等人身方面的強(qiáng)暴行為,目前己成為一個(gè)全球范圍普遍關(guān)注的重要社會(huì)問題和公共衛(wèi)生問題,對(duì)婦女及其子女的健康構(gòu)成了極大威脅。 全國婦聯(lián)一項(xiàng)調(diào)查數(shù)據(jù)顯示,我國2.7億個(gè)家庭中大約30%的家庭存在不同程度的家庭暴力,施暴者90%以上是男性,且其中很大比例發(fā)生在農(nóng)村家庭。農(nóng)村育齡期婦女不僅是農(nóng)業(yè)勞動(dòng)力,而且是維持日常家庭生計(jì)的主要支柱。針對(duì)農(nóng)村育齡婦女家庭暴力的發(fā)生率不斷上升,破壞家庭和諧,影響家庭成員的健康發(fā)展,其后果是十分嚴(yán)重的。我國農(nóng)村育齡婦女對(duì)家庭暴力的認(rèn)知存在諸多誤區(qū),意識(shí)不到家庭暴力是對(duì)婦女合法權(quán)益的一種侵犯,反而將其視為家庭私事和日常生活的一部分。男尊女卑的封建意識(shí)在廣大農(nóng)村地區(qū)仍然盛行,不少地區(qū)男性夫權(quán)思想嚴(yán)重,導(dǎo)致很多人認(rèn)為家庭暴力的發(fā)生責(zé)任在婦女,而意識(shí)不到是社會(huì)性別不平等這個(gè)深層次原因。農(nóng)村地區(qū)育齡婦女對(duì)家庭暴力的認(rèn)知水平高低不等,對(duì)家庭暴力的行為了解不多,導(dǎo)致農(nóng)村育齡婦女遭受家庭暴力情況日趨嚴(yán)重。 [研究目的] 本研究旨在了解農(nóng)村育齡期婦女家庭暴力認(rèn)知情況,在此基礎(chǔ)上分析農(nóng)村育齡期婦女家庭暴力認(rèn)知水平的影響因素,結(jié)合數(shù)據(jù)結(jié)果提出相關(guān)政策、建議,為制定相關(guān)干預(yù)政策和措施提供理論依據(jù)。 [研究方法] 本研究采用分層整群隨機(jī)抽樣的方法,根據(jù)人均GDP水平將目標(biāo)省份所有地級(jí)市分為好、中、差三類,采用單純隨機(jī)抽樣方法抽取3個(gè)市6個(gè)鄉(xiāng)鎮(zhèn),在每個(gè)鄉(xiāng)鎮(zhèn)中再按照經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展水平隨機(jī)抽取3個(gè)村,共18個(gè)村,每個(gè)樣本村中抽取60名育齡期婦女作為調(diào)查對(duì)象,實(shí)際調(diào)查育齡期婦女990人,回收有效問卷924份,有效回收率93.33%。所用調(diào)查表根據(jù)國外相關(guān)研究后自制,調(diào)查形式為入戶面對(duì)面調(diào)查,問卷當(dāng)場核對(duì)并回收、編號(hào),后期雙份錄入后采用SPSS16.0統(tǒng)計(jì)軟件進(jìn)行數(shù)據(jù)分析,統(tǒng)計(jì)結(jié)果采用描述性分析、卡方檢驗(yàn)、Logistic回歸等分析方法。 [主要結(jié)果] 1.隨著家庭暴力行為內(nèi)容嚴(yán)重程度的增加,被調(diào)查對(duì)象納入家庭暴力的人數(shù)和比例也隨之增加。 2.單因素分析結(jié)果顯示,教育程度、家庭收入水平、生育觀念及家庭地位等因素是育齡期婦女家庭暴力認(rèn)知水平的影響因素。不同教育程度對(duì)“取笑辱罵對(duì)方”、“限制行動(dòng)自由”、“威脅”3個(gè)家庭暴力類型的認(rèn)知不同；不同收入水平對(duì)家庭暴力類型中“取笑辱罵對(duì)方”、“經(jīng)濟(jì)控制”、“限制行動(dòng)自由”、“威脅”和“推搡”5個(gè)家庭暴力類型的認(rèn)知不同；不同人均年收入的育齡婦女對(duì)“經(jīng)常取笑或辱罵對(duì)方”的認(rèn)知率不同；不同受教育水平在“限制行動(dòng)自由”和“威脅”兩種類型認(rèn)知不同；不同家庭生育觀念在“長期不與對(duì)方說話”、“經(jīng)濟(jì)控制”、“拳打腳踢”三種類型的認(rèn)知不同；不同家庭地位對(duì)“經(jīng)常取笑或辱罵對(duì)方”屬于家庭暴力的認(rèn)知不同；不同居住情況對(duì)“威脅”、“推搡”、“拳打腳踢”、“使用工具進(jìn)攻”四類家庭暴力類型的認(rèn)知不同；不同地區(qū)的育齡婦女對(duì)“限制行動(dòng)自由”屬于家庭暴力的認(rèn)知方面不同； 3Logistic回歸結(jié)果顯示,非貧困戶、文化程度高以及家人不希望生女兒為家庭暴力的危險(xiǎn)因素。 [結(jié)論] 農(nóng)村育齡期婦女對(duì)家庭暴力認(rèn)知存在誤區(qū),對(duì)心理暴力等冷暴力認(rèn)知不足。農(nóng)村育齡期婦女的家庭情況、自身情況、配偶情況等眾多因素對(duì)家庭暴力認(rèn)知存在影響。 [對(duì)策與建議] 1、政府參與,加強(qiáng)宣傳,增加人們特別是婦女對(duì)家庭暴力的認(rèn)識(shí)。 2、完善反家庭暴力法律法規(guī),加大立法力度,加重社會(huì)對(duì)家庭暴力的懲罰。 3、充分發(fā)揮婦聯(lián)、工會(huì)等組織的作用,加大對(duì)婦女權(quán)益的保護(hù)力度。 4、從社會(huì)根源上消除社會(huì)性別角色對(duì)婦女的束縛。 5、提高育齡期婦女自身的社會(huì)適應(yīng)能力。 6、積極營造反家庭暴力的社會(huì)氛圍。 7、計(jì)生服務(wù)網(wǎng)絡(luò)參與的干預(yù)活動(dòng)。
[Abstract]:[research background]
Domestic violence refers to the violence, torment, destruction and oppression of family members, which has become an important social and public health problem worldwide, which poses a great threat to the health of women and their children.
A survey of the National Women's Federation (ACWF) survey shows that about 30% of the families of 270 million families in China have different degrees of domestic violence. More than 90% of the perpetrators are men, and a large proportion of them occur in rural families. The rural women of childbearing age are not only the agricultural labor force, but also the main support for the maintenance of daily family livelihood. The incidence of domestic violence in women is rising, destroying family harmony and affecting the healthy development of family members. The consequences are very serious. There are many misunderstandings in the cognition of domestic violence in rural women of childbearing age in our country. It is not aware that domestic violence is a violation of the legitimate rights and interests of women. Instead, it is regarded as a family private affair and a daily life. A part of living. The feudal consciousness of men and women is still prevalent in the vast rural areas. In many areas, men have serious thought of husband's rights. Many people think that the responsibility of domestic violence is in women, but the consciousness of gender inequality is not the deep reason. There is little understanding of domestic violence, which has led to increasingly serious domestic violence among women of childbearing age in rural areas.
[research purposes]
The purpose of this study is to understand the cognition of domestic violence in rural childbearing age, and on the basis of this, to analyze the factors affecting the cognitive level of domestic violence in rural women of childbearing age, and to put forward relevant policies and suggestions based on the results of the data, and provide a theoretical basis for the formulation of relevant intervention policies and measures.
[research methods]
In this study, the method of stratified cluster random sampling was used to divide all grade cities in the target provinces into good, medium and bad three categories according to the per capita GDP level. 3 cities and 6 towns were selected by simple random sampling. In each township, 3 villages were randomly selected according to the level of economic development, and 18 villages were selected in a total of 18 villages and 60 childbearing age women were extracted from each sample village. As an object of investigation, 990 women of childbearing age were investigated and 924 valid questionnaires were collected. The questionnaire was made in the form of self-made by foreign related research. The questionnaire was checked and recovered in the form of the questionnaire on the spot, and the data were analyzed with SPSS16.0 statistics software after the late double entry, and the statistical results were obtained. Descriptive analysis, chi square test and Logistic regression analysis were used.
[main results]
1. with the increase in the severity of domestic violence, the number and proportion of respondents who were involved in domestic violence increased.
2. single factor analysis showed that educational level, family income level, birth concept and family status were the factors affecting the cognitive level of domestic violence in women of childbearing age. Different educational levels were different in the cognition of "teasing abusive abuse", "restricting action freedom", "threat" and "threat", and different income levels. The cognitions of 5 types of domestic violence in the type of domestic violence: "teasing abusive abuse", "economic control", "restricting freedom of action", "threat" and "push and shoving" are different; the cognitive rate of women of child-bearing age of different per capita annual income on "often teasing or abusing each other" is different; different levels of education are "restricting freedom of action" The cognitive differences between the two types of "menace" and "threat" are different. Different family concepts are different in the three types: "long term does not speak to each other", "economic control" and "punching and kicking". The cognitions of the four types of domestic violence, such as "pushing", "punching and kicking" and "using tool attack", are different in the cognitive aspects of the "restricted freedom of action" in different areas.
3Logistic regression showed that non poor families, high education and family members did not want to give birth to daughters as a risk factor for domestic violence.
[Conclusion]
There are some misunderstandings on domestic violence in rural childbearing age and lack of cognition of cold violence such as psychological violence. The family situation, self situation and spouse situation in rural childbearing age women affect the cognition of domestic violence.
[countermeasures and suggestions]
1, the government has taken part in strengthening publicity to increase people's awareness of domestic violence, especially women.
2, we should improve laws and regulations against domestic violence, intensify legislation and increase social penalties for domestic violence.
3, give full play to the role of women's federations, trade unions and other organizations, and increase the protection of women's rights and interests.
4, eliminate social constraints on women from the social root.
5, improve the social adaptability of women of childbearing age.
6, actively create a social atmosphere against domestic violence.
7, the intervention activities involved in the network of family planning services.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：山東大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號(hào)】：C913.1

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 李軍;萬川;魏澤紅;朱平;;186例家庭暴力致死案(事)件的法醫(yī)學(xué)分析[J];中國法醫(yī)學(xué)雜志;2011年05期

2 劉曉梅;;英國反家庭暴力的立法、實(shí)踐及其啟示[J];法學(xué)雜志;2006年03期

3 蒙麗華;;婚姻家庭暴力研究[J];法制與社會(huì);2008年31期

4 鄧剛健;;關(guān)于家庭暴力長期存在根源的法理探析[J];湖北經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(人文社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2007年07期

5 張克春,葉冬青;婦女遭受家庭暴力現(xiàn)狀[J];疾病控制雜志;2004年06期

6 王明美,鄭百靈;家庭暴力:概念、現(xiàn)狀、成因及對(duì)策[J];江西社會(huì)科學(xué);2002年09期

7 何蕾;宋健;;家庭暴力的現(xiàn)狀、原因及對(duì)策——公共政策和社會(huì)性別視角下的探討[J];南京人口管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2008年01期

8 陳維;劉琴;;農(nóng)村婦女遭受家庭暴力的原因及對(duì)策[J];商丘職業(yè)技術(shù)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2010年06期

9 師艷榮;;關(guān)于日本婦女遭受家庭暴力的思考[J];日本問題研究;2008年03期

10 賈紅英;;淺析家庭暴力中的新形式“冷暴力”[J];無錫職業(yè)技術(shù)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2008年05期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 孫淑愛;威海市居民家庭暴力認(rèn)知現(xiàn)狀及影響因素研究[D];山東大學(xué);2006年

，

本文編號(hào)：1908782