新、老兩代流動(dòng)人口居留意愿差異研究——以北京、上海、廣州為例
發(fā)布時(shí)間:2018-03-23 02:17
本文選題:新生代流動(dòng)人口 切入點(diǎn):老生代流動(dòng)人口 出處:《調(diào)研世界》2017年07期 論文類型:期刊論文
【摘要】:本文以2015年全國(guó)流動(dòng)人口動(dòng)態(tài)監(jiān)測(cè)調(diào)查北京、上海、廣州三地?cái)?shù)據(jù)為基礎(chǔ),對(duì)新生代和老生代流動(dòng)人口城市居留意愿及其影響因素的差異進(jìn)行了實(shí)證分析。研究發(fā)現(xiàn),流動(dòng)人口居留大城市的意愿較高,其中老生代流動(dòng)人口居留意愿高于新生代,新生代流動(dòng)人口內(nèi)部出現(xiàn)分化,"80后"居留意愿較高,"90后"舉棋不定者較多。流動(dòng)人口居留意愿二元Logistics回歸模型結(jié)果顯示,性別、教育、職業(yè)、就業(yè)身份、收入等因素造成新生代和老生代流動(dòng)人口居留意愿的差異。對(duì)新、老兩代流動(dòng)人口而言,家庭成員的陪伴和社會(huì)的接納是決定他們是否在大城市"安居"的關(guān)鍵。
[Abstract]:Based on the data of Beijing, Shanghai and Guangzhou in 2015, this paper makes an empirical analysis on the difference of the urban residence intention and its influencing factors between the new generation and the old generation. The willingness of floating population to stay in big cities is higher, among which the old generation of floating population is higher than the new generation. The internal differentiation of the new generation of floating population, the "post-80s" has higher residence intention, and the "post-90s" is more vacillating. The result of the binary Logistics regression model shows that sex, education, occupation, employment status, and so on. Income and other factors cause the difference of residence intention between the new generation and the old generation of floating population. For the new and old generation of floating population, the family members' companionship and social acceptance are the key to decide whether they live in a big city or not.
【作者單位】: 中國(guó)人民大學(xué)社會(huì)與人口學(xué)院人口學(xué)系;
【分類號(hào)】:C913.6
,
本文編號(hào):1651457
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/shekelunwen/shgj/1651457.html
最近更新
教材專著