本文選題：社會(huì)流動(dòng)性　切入點(diǎn)：代際住房資產(chǎn)彈性系數(shù)　出處：《上海師范大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：貧富差距過(guò)大問(wèn)題不僅是社會(huì)學(xué)的研究熱點(diǎn),同時(shí)也是經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)的熱門話題。本文從住房資產(chǎn)角度出發(fā),運(yùn)用“中國(guó)健康與養(yǎng)老追蹤調(diào)查”2011年和2013年的微觀數(shù)據(jù),建立了住房資產(chǎn)代際流動(dòng)性彈性模型,測(cè)度我國(guó)社會(huì)代際流動(dòng)性的大小,以及住房資產(chǎn)代際流動(dòng)性傳導(dǎo)模型,研究代際傳遞強(qiáng)弱的影響因素及其影響力大小排名。本文的主要研究結(jié)論為:(1)基于住房資產(chǎn)的我國(guó)居民家庭代際流動(dòng)性彈性大小,分別為0.371和0.4117,接近國(guó)內(nèi)已有研究關(guān)于收入代際流動(dòng)性彈性的大小研究,我國(guó)的代際彈性遠(yuǎn)高于世界平均水平,社會(huì)流動(dòng)性較低;(2)住房資產(chǎn)代際彈性的區(qū)域差異結(jié)果顯示東部地區(qū)高于中西部地區(qū),表明東部地區(qū)社會(huì)流動(dòng)性更低;(3)住房資產(chǎn)代際彈性的城鄉(xiāng)差異結(jié)果顯示城鎮(zhèn)高于農(nóng)村,表明城鎮(zhèn)社會(huì)流動(dòng)性較低;(4)住房資產(chǎn)代際流動(dòng)性傳導(dǎo)模型結(jié)果顯示,主要代際影響因素除父代住房資產(chǎn)以外,影響力排名依次為城鄉(xiāng)類型、子代受教育程度為本科及以上、父代職業(yè)是否為國(guó)家機(jī)關(guān)黨群組織企業(yè)事業(yè)負(fù)責(zé)人、東西部地區(qū)類型以及子代金融資產(chǎn)。為了促進(jìn)社會(huì)流動(dòng)性、減緩社會(huì)固化,需要政府采取相應(yīng)措施,保障廣大居民“住有所居”,實(shí)現(xiàn)“有恒產(chǎn)者有恒心”的目標(biāo),盡力實(shí)現(xiàn)住房分配的平等性;此外,還應(yīng)堅(jiān)持教育為本、百年樹人的國(guó)之大計(jì),提高國(guó)民的整體文化素質(zhì),普及大眾教育,強(qiáng)化精英教育;同時(shí),還需要試圖推行可行的政治改革,弱化權(quán)力的尋租行為;種種以上行為都是為了減少住房資產(chǎn)的代際傳遞性,實(shí)現(xiàn)社會(huì)的機(jī)會(huì)公平,促進(jìn)公平和效率關(guān)系辯證統(tǒng)一的和諧發(fā)展。
[Abstract]:The problem of the gap between the rich and the poor is not only a hot topic in sociology, but also a hot topic in economics. The elasticity model of intergenerational mobility of housing assets is established to measure the size of intergenerational mobility and the transmission model of intergenerational mobility of housing assets. This paper studies the influence factors of intergenerational transmission and its influence ranking. The main conclusion of this paper is: 1) the intergenerational mobility elasticity of Chinese households based on housing assets. They are 0.371 and 0.4117, respectively, which are close to the domestic studies on the size of intergenerational mobility elasticity of income. The intergenerational elasticity of China is much higher than the world average. The regional difference of intergenerational elasticity of housing assets in the eastern region is higher than that in the central and western regions, indicating that the urban and rural differences in the intergenerational elasticity of housing assets show that the urban and rural areas are higher than those in the rural areas, indicating that the social mobility of the eastern region is lower than that of the central and western regions. The results of intergenerational mobility conduction model of housing assets show that the main intergenerational influencing factors are the urban and rural types in order, and the education level of the offspring is undergraduate or above, in addition to the father's housing assets, the main intergenerational influencing factors are the urban and rural types in turn, and the results show that the main intergenerational influencing factors are the urban and rural types. Are the father-generation occupations responsible for the party and mass organizations of state organs, the types of enterprises in the eastern and western regions, and the financial assets of the children. In order to promote social mobility and slow down social solidification, the government needs to take appropriate measures. To ensure that the majority of the residents "live and live", to achieve the goal of "having permanent wealth," and to make every effort to achieve equality in the distribution of housing; in addition, we should adhere to the principle of education as the foundation, and raise the overall cultural quality of the people in order to raise the overall cultural quality of the people. Popularizing mass education and strengthening elite education; at the same time, trying to promote viable political reforms and weakening power rent-seeking; all these acts are aimed at reducing the intergenerational transmission of housing assets and achieving social equity of opportunity. Promote the harmonious development of the dialectical unity between fairness and efficiency.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：上海師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：C913.11

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 丁亭亭;王仕睿;于麗;;中國(guó)城鎮(zhèn)代際收入流動(dòng)實(shí)證研究——基于Jorgenson-Fraumeni未來(lái)終生收入的估算[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)理論與經(jīng)濟(jì)管理;2016年07期

2 王學(xué)龍;袁易明;;中國(guó)社會(huì)代際流動(dòng)性之變遷:趨勢(shì)與原因[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2015年09期

3 陳東;黃旭鋒;;機(jī)會(huì)不平等在多大程度上影響了收入不平等?——基于代際轉(zhuǎn)移的視角[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)評(píng)論;2015年01期

4 康靜;;淺析我國(guó)區(qū)域經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展不平衡產(chǎn)生的原因及對(duì)策[J];現(xiàn)代經(jīng)濟(jì)信息;2015年01期

5 張傳勇;;住房投資、家庭資產(chǎn)配置與社會(huì)財(cái)富分配[J];學(xué)術(shù)月刊;2014年12期

6 盧盛峰;陳思霞;;中國(guó)居民代際間地位流動(dòng)性分析[J];世界經(jīng)濟(jì)文匯;2014年03期

7 劉非菲;梁巖;;中國(guó)居民職業(yè)代際繼承效應(yīng)的實(shí)證分析[J];統(tǒng)計(jì)與決策;2014年10期

8 黃靜;崔光燦;;住房分配貨幣化、房?jī)r(jià)上漲與城鎮(zhèn)居民住房財(cái)產(chǎn)差距分化——基于家庭微觀調(diào)查數(shù)據(jù)的分析[J];當(dāng)代經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2013年05期

9 何石軍;黃桂田;;中國(guó)社會(huì)的代際收入流動(dòng)性趨勢(shì):2000～2009[J];金融研究;2013年02期

10 胡洪曙;魯元平;;收入不平等、健康與老年人主觀幸福感——來(lái)自中國(guó)老齡化背景下的經(jīng)驗(yàn)證據(jù)[J];中國(guó)軟科學(xué);2012年11期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 王鵬;收入差距對(duì)我國(guó)居民幸福感的影響研究[D];西南財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué);2012年

2 潘春陽(yáng);中國(guó)的機(jī)會(huì)不平等與居民幸福感研究[D];復(fù)旦大學(xué);2011年

3 管衛(wèi)華;中國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)波動(dòng)的多尺度分析及其預(yù)測(cè)[D];南京師范大學(xué);2005年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 黃建忠;對(duì)外開(kāi)放程度與代際流動(dòng)性[D];湘潭大學(xué);2013年

2 曾艷芳;我國(guó)代際收入彈性及其變動(dòng)研究[D];首都經(jīng)濟(jì)貿(mào)易大學(xué);2012年

，

本文編號(hào)：1647909