社會(huì)科學(xué)何以走出偽實(shí)證研究
發(fā)布時(shí)間:2018-03-19 10:00
本文選題:社會(huì)科學(xué) 切入點(diǎn):實(shí)證研究 出處:《探索與爭(zhēng)鳴》2017年01期 論文類型:期刊論文
【摘要】:社會(huì)科學(xué)發(fā)展長(zhǎng)期深受偽實(shí)證研究困擾。在比較實(shí)證研究與偽實(shí)證研究異同的基礎(chǔ)上,偽實(shí)證可以被區(qū)分為認(rèn)知錯(cuò)誤型偽實(shí)證、邏輯錯(cuò)誤型偽實(shí)證和操作錯(cuò)誤型偽實(shí)證,并作進(jìn)一步細(xì)分。而偽實(shí)證研究產(chǎn)生的原因可以歸結(jié)為利益驅(qū)動(dòng)、缺乏理性精神、權(quán)威崇拜的消極影響、問(wèn)題意識(shí)匱乏、數(shù)據(jù)獲取缺陷以及對(duì)數(shù)據(jù)的錯(cuò)誤使用、社會(huì)科學(xué)研究方法的滯后等方面。相應(yīng)地,走出偽實(shí)證研究,可以從完善科研管理制度、弘揚(yáng)理性精神、克服權(quán)威崇拜的消極影響、培養(yǎng)問(wèn)題意識(shí)、改進(jìn)數(shù)據(jù)收集處理方法以及改進(jìn)研究方法等方面加以努力。
[Abstract]:The development of social science has been plagued by pseudo empirical research for a long time. On the basis of comparing the similarities and differences between the empirical research and the pseudo empirical research, pseudo positivism can be divided into three types: cognitive false positive, logic false false positive and operation false false positive. The causes of pseudo empirical research can be attributed to interest drive, lack of rational spirit, negative influence of authority worship, lack of problem consciousness, defect of data acquisition and wrong use of data. The lag of social science research methods and so on. Accordingly, out of the pseudo-empirical research, we can improve the scientific research management system, carry forward the rational spirit, overcome the negative influence of authority worship, and cultivate the awareness of problems. Efforts should be made to improve data collection and processing methods and research methods.
【作者單位】: 安徽大學(xué)中國(guó)三農(nóng)問(wèn)題研究中心;
【基金】:國(guó)家社科基金項(xiàng)目“政府主導(dǎo)型農(nóng)地大規(guī)模流轉(zhuǎn)問(wèn)題研究”(12CJY052) 安徽省質(zhì)量工程項(xiàng)目“安徽大學(xué)經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)品牌專業(yè)建設(shè)”
【分類號(hào)】:C91
【相似文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條
1 周志發(fā);林斌;;重建教師概念:“分享錯(cuò)誤型”教師[J];學(xué)術(shù)界;2010年03期
,本文編號(hào):1633772
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/shekelunwen/shgj/1633772.html
最近更新
教材專著