本文選題：相對剝奪　切入點(diǎn)：主觀幸福感　出處：《天津理工大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：主觀幸福感反映了個體生活滿意度,是國家治理的“晴雨表”,表征著政治和社會的穩(wěn)定程度�！癊asterlin悖論”的出現(xiàn)證明了收入水平不是影響主觀幸福感的唯一原因,收入不平等程度的擴(kuò)大也會降低居民主觀幸福感。相對剝奪反映了個體以及群體之間的不公平程度,可以看作是個體對自身剝奪和貧困進(jìn)行分析后作出的客觀判斷。因此,相對剝奪與主觀幸福感在福利經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)上存在一個交叉點(diǎn),是收入分配領(lǐng)域和心理學(xué)領(lǐng)域跨學(xué)科的結(jié)合,方便利用客觀存在并且穩(wěn)定的剝奪指標(biāo)衡量主觀不穩(wěn)定的幸福感指標(biāo),進(jìn)而為政策制定者提供有利的數(shù)據(jù)支持。本文首先回顧了主觀幸福感、相對剝奪以及相對剝奪影響主觀幸福感的相關(guān)研究;然后從理論基礎(chǔ)和實證研究兩個方面對相對剝奪影響我國居民主觀幸福感進(jìn)行了相關(guān)分析;最后對研究結(jié)果進(jìn)行總結(jié)并提出提高我國居民主觀幸福感的政策建議。具體行文框架為以下五個方面。第一章:緒論。該部分首先對研究相對剝奪影響主觀幸福感的相關(guān)背景進(jìn)行了介紹,闡明了本文寫作的理論與現(xiàn)實意義,然后歸納了研究方法、總體研究思路以及主要內(nèi)容,繪制了技術(shù)路線圖,最后介紹了研究的主要創(chuàng)新之處。第二章:主觀幸福感與相對剝奪相關(guān)研究綜述。該部分首先對主觀幸福感概念進(jìn)行界定并梳理了我國居民的主觀幸福感的變動趨勢和影響因素。其次對相對剝奪進(jìn)行介紹,主要集中在概念和測量方法兩個方面。第三步回顧了關(guān)于主觀幸福感與相對剝奪關(guān)系的文獻(xiàn),梳理了相對剝奪影響主觀幸福感機(jī)理研究和實證研究兩個方面的內(nèi)容。第三章:收入剝奪影響主觀幸福感的理論基礎(chǔ)和模型構(gòu)建。該部分主要對相對剝奪影響主觀幸福感進(jìn)行了理論基礎(chǔ)和計量模型構(gòu)建的闡述,一方面將經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)中“效用”的概念與主觀幸福感相聯(lián)系,通過對基數(shù)效用理論和序數(shù)效用理論的研究建立了考慮收入剝奪的個體效用函數(shù),另一方面構(gòu)建了基本計量模型和Ordered Probit回歸分析模型。第四章:收入剝奪影響我國城鄉(xiāng)居民主觀幸福感的實證研究。實證數(shù)據(jù)來源于CHIP2013數(shù)據(jù)庫,主要從城鎮(zhèn)、農(nóng)村和勞動力遷移三個角度進(jìn)行研究。由于三個角度樣本略有差異,因此在變量的選擇上把相同的部分歸類為一般變量,不同部分歸類為特殊變量。然后利用STATA計量工具對數(shù)據(jù)進(jìn)行了描述性統(tǒng)計、相關(guān)性分析和Ordered Probit估計,得出實證結(jié)果。最后就三組樣本的實證結(jié)果作對比分析,并結(jié)合我國情況給出合理解釋。第五章:結(jié)論與政策建議。首先對相對剝奪影響主觀幸福感的理論和實證研究進(jìn)行概括總結(jié)。然后提出了提高我國居民主觀幸福感的五點(diǎn)政策建議:完善收入分配與再分配制度、提高居民教育水平、關(guān)注居民的健康問題、營造社會信任氛圍、完善社會福利保障制度。
[Abstract]:Subjective well-being reflects individual life satisfaction, is a "barometer" of national governance, and represents the degree of political and social stability. The appearance of "Easterlin Paradox" proves that income level is not the only reason that affects subjective well-being. The increase of income inequality can also reduce the subjective well-being of residents. Relative deprivation reflects the degree of inequality among individuals and groups, and can be regarded as an objective judgment made by individuals after analyzing their own deprivation and poverty. There is a cross point between relative deprivation and subjective well-being in welfare economics, which is the interdisciplinary combination of income distribution field and psychology field. It is convenient to use objective and stable deprivation indicators to measure subjective unstable well-being indicators. Then it provides favorable data support for policy makers. Firstly, this paper reviews the relevant studies on subjective well-being, relative deprivation and relative deprivation. Then it analyzes the impact of relative deprivation on the subjective well-being of Chinese residents from the two aspects of theoretical basis and empirical research. Finally, it summarizes the results of the study and puts forward some policy recommendations to improve the subjective well-being of Chinese residents. The specific formulation framework is as follows. Chapter 1: introduction. This part first affects subjective happiness on the study of relative deprivation. The background of the feeling is introduced. This paper expounds the theoretical and practical significance of this writing, then summarizes the research methods, general research ideas and main contents, and draws the technical roadmap. Finally, it introduces the main innovations of the research. Chapter 2: summary of the research on subjective well-being and relative deprivation. This part defines the concept of subjective well-being and combs the changes of subjective well-being of Chinese residents. Trends and influencing factors. Secondly, the relative deprivation is introduced. The third step reviews the literature on the relationship between subjective well-being and relative deprivation. Chapter three: the theoretical basis and model construction of income deprivation affecting subjective well-being. This part mainly affects the relative deprivation of the subjective well-being of the main body. The theoretical basis and the construction of econometric model of the sense of well-being are expounded. On the one hand, the concept of "utility" in economics is connected with subjective well-being, and the individual utility function considering income deprivation is established by studying the basic utility theory and ordinal utility theory. On the other hand, the basic econometric model and Ordered Probit regression model are constructed. Chapter 4th: empirical study on the effect of income deprivation on subjective Well-being of Urban and Rural residents in China. Rural and labor migration are studied from three angles. Because the sample samples from the three angles are slightly different, the same parts are classified as general variables in the selection of variables. Different parts are classified as special variables, and then the descriptive statistics, correlation analysis and Ordered Probit estimation are used to obtain the empirical results. Finally, the empirical results of the three groups of samples are compared and analyzed. Chapter 5th: conclusions and policy recommendations. Firstly, the theoretical and empirical research on the effect of relative deprivation on subjective well-being is summarized. Then, the author proposes to improve the subjective well-being of Chinese residents. A five-point policy proposal: to improve the system of income distribution and redistribution, Improve the education level of residents, pay attention to the health problems of residents, build social trust atmosphere and perfect the social welfare security system.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：天津理工大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：C912.6

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前3條

1 李俊;相對剝奪理論與弱勢群體的心理疏導(dǎo)機(jī)制[J];社會科學(xué);2004年04期

2 劉琦;;社會剝奪研究文獻(xiàn)綜述[J];才智;2013年08期

3 李強(qiáng);社會學(xué)的“剝奪”理論與我國農(nóng)民工問題[J];學(xué)術(shù)界;2004年04期

相關(guān)會議論文 前1條

1 張書維;周潔;王二平;;群體相對剝奪的前因及其對集群行為的影響——基于災(zāi)區(qū)民眾調(diào)查的實證研究[A];第十二屆全國心理學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)大會論文摘要集[C];2009年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 魏倩嵐;相對剝奪對我國城鄉(xiāng)居民主觀幸福感的影響研究[D];天津理工大學(xué);2017年

2 范嫣紅;相對剝奪理論與外來人口犯罪[D];復(fù)旦大學(xué);2011年

，

本文編號：1572219