“理性”與“感性”之間:上海流動人口遷居意愿研究
發(fā)布時間:2018-02-17 01:39
本文關鍵詞: 流動人口 居住遷居 居住意愿 再流動 上海 出處:《現(xiàn)代城市研究》2017年07期 論文類型:期刊論文
【摘要】:中國大城市已進入"移民城市"時代,提升流動人口居住意愿對保持城市發(fā)展活力具有重要意義。對上海流動人口的遷居意愿與再流動意向進行研究,并采用Logistic回歸分析方法探討影響機制。研究發(fā)現(xiàn),在當前"城鄉(xiāng)二元結構"與"城市內部二元結構"下,大量流動人口處于幸福感低但定居意愿強的狀況。在再流動地的選擇上,返鄉(xiāng)是流動人口再流動的主要選擇。在影響機制上,家庭收入高、擁有住房、家庭成員共同生活的流動人口定居意愿較強,而經(jīng)濟收入低、租賃住房、家庭成員離散的流動人口遷居意愿較強,且流動人口定居行為呈現(xiàn)出明顯的"居住慣性"。在流動人口再流動意向上,呈現(xiàn)出受教育水平越高、家庭負擔越小,繼續(xù)向其他城市流動的可能性越大,而年齡越大、家鄉(xiāng)發(fā)展環(huán)境越好則返鄉(xiāng)的可能性越高。在"十三五"發(fā)展期,建議盡快將長期定居城市但發(fā)展能力弱的流動人口及其家庭納入城市福利保障體系之中,減少流動人口入戶的"選擇性歧視"。
[Abstract]:China's big cities have entered the era of "immigrant cities". It is of great significance to improve the living willingness of floating population in order to maintain the vitality of urban development. Logistic regression analysis was used to explore the influence mechanism. The study found that under the current "urban-rural dual structure" and "urban internal dual structure", A large number of the floating population are in a situation of low happiness but strong willingness to settle. In the choice of refloating places, returning home is the main choice for the reflow of the floating population. In terms of the influence mechanism, the family income is high, and they own housing. The floating population with family members living together is more willing to settle down, while the migrant population with low economic income, rental housing and separated family members are more willing to move. And the settlement behavior of the floating population shows obvious "residence inertia". The higher the education level, the smaller the family burden, and the more likely the floating population will continue to move to other cities, and the older the floating population is, The better the development environment in your hometown, the higher the possibility of returning home. During the 13th Five-Year Plan development period, it was suggested that the floating population and their families, who had settled in cities for a long time but had weak development capabilities, should be included in the urban welfare security system as soon as possible. Reduce the "selective discrimination" of floating population entering the household.
【作者單位】: 東南大學建筑學院;東南大學城鄉(xiāng)規(guī)劃與經(jīng)濟社會發(fā)展研究中心;江蘇省城市經(jīng)濟學會;中山大學地理科學與規(guī)劃學院;中國城市規(guī)劃學會;武漢大學城市設計學院;
【基金】:國家自然科學基金項目(41320104001,41422103,41501151) 東南大學重大科學研究引導基金“弱勢群體與城鄉(xiāng)空間公平共享”(編號:2242017S30004);東南大學江蘇首批高端智庫基地配套項目資助
【分類號】:C912.6;C922
,
本文編號:1516918
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/shekelunwen/shgj/1516918.html