本文關(guān)鍵詞：社會轉(zhuǎn)型背景下人民陪審員制度改革路徑探析，由筆耕文化傳播整理發(fā)布。

【期刊名稱】 《中國法學》

社會轉(zhuǎn)型背景下人民陪審員制度改革路徑探析

【英文標題】 社會轉(zhuǎn)型背景下人民陪審員制度改革路徑探析

【作者】 廖永安【作者單位】 湘潭大學法學院{教授、博士生導師}

【分類】 訴訟制度【中文關(guān)鍵詞】 人民陪審，陪審制，參審制

【期刊年份】 2012年【期號】 3

【頁碼】 147

【摘要】 以陪審員與法官“同職同權(quán)同責”為基軸設(shè)計的我國人民陪審員制度，脫離了傳統(tǒng)城鄉(xiāng)二元社會正在轉(zhuǎn)型的現(xiàn)實背景，不可避免地將改革導向“精英化”, 并難以避免各種異化現(xiàn)象發(fā)生。人民陪審員制度改革必須與二元轉(zhuǎn)型社會結(jié)構(gòu)相適應(yīng)，以陪審員與法官分職分權(quán)為基礎(chǔ)，構(gòu)造參審制與陪審制結(jié)合、平民陪審與專家陪審共存、常識判斷與專業(yè)判斷并行的陪審制度二元結(jié)構(gòu)體系。在以平民陪審踐行司法大眾化的同時，也可以以專家陪審補足法官職業(yè)化不足的缺失，以有效提升司法的品質(zhì)。

【英文摘要】 People's assessor system in China is designed on the basis of both jurors and judges having “the same duties, rights and liabilities”, which breaks away from the reality background that traditional dualistic society of urban and rural is transforming. In addition, this system will cause reform elitization inevitably and cannot avoid the happening of various dissimilation phenomena. Based on the separation of powers, the reform of people's juror system must correspond to the structure of dualistic society and establish a dualistic structure system in which assessor system is combined with jury system, civilian jury and professional jury can coexist, and common sense judge and professional judge are collateral. In order to promote judicial quality, it is also necessary to utilize the professional jury to complement insufficient judge professionalism at the time of achieving the popularization of civilian jury.

©北大法寶：()專業(yè)提供法律信息、法學知識和法律軟件領(lǐng)域各類解決方案。北大法寶為您提供豐富的參考資料，，正式引用法規(guī)條文時請與標準文本核對。
歡迎查看所有產(chǎn)品和服務(wù)。法寶快訊：如何快速找到您需要的檢索結(jié)果？    法寶V5有何新特色？

本篇【

  本文關(guān)鍵詞：社會轉(zhuǎn)型背景下人民陪審員制度改革路徑探析，由筆耕文化傳播整理發(fā)布。