【摘要】：隨著市場(chǎng)機(jī)制的改革的推進(jìn),我國(guó)國(guó)民收入絕對(duì)值日益增長(zhǎng)。但我國(guó)國(guó)民收入仍呈現(xiàn)較大的差距。為促進(jìn)國(guó)民收入公平,進(jìn)一步構(gòu)建和諧社會(huì),應(yīng)當(dāng)高度重視收入差距的存在。本文以是否考慮勞動(dòng)力職業(yè)流動(dòng)作為兩個(gè)不同研究視角,在理論研究、文獻(xiàn)研究基礎(chǔ)上,運(yùn)用CLDS(2014)數(shù)據(jù)進(jìn)行實(shí)證分析,研究勞動(dòng)力市場(chǎng)分割、人力資本特征差異等方面對(duì)行業(yè)工資回報(bào)的差異的影響,力求多層次探究行業(yè)工資回報(bào)差異不同因素的影響效果。研究結(jié)果表明,我國(guó)行業(yè)間工資回報(bào)差異整體呈現(xiàn)逐步縮小趨勢(shì),影響我國(guó)的行業(yè)工資回報(bào)的制度等非市場(chǎng)性因素作用有所減弱。但是,不同行業(yè)仍然存在著明顯的工資回報(bào)差異。無(wú)論是否考慮勞動(dòng)力職業(yè)流動(dòng)的影響效應(yīng),勞動(dòng)力市場(chǎng)分割對(duì)行業(yè)工資回報(bào)差異解釋力度都較高。同樣的人力資本條件下,壟斷部門(mén)員工會(huì)獲得相對(duì)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)部門(mén)的較高工資回報(bào)。高水平的人力資本會(huì)獲得更高的工資回報(bào)。勞動(dòng)力職業(yè)流動(dòng)受所有制因素影響顯著,并且與壟斷部門(mén)的行業(yè)工資回報(bào)負(fù)向相關(guān),即壟斷停留者會(huì)獲得更高收入,而競(jìng)爭(zhēng)部門(mén)結(jié)論與之相反。勞動(dòng)者的社會(huì)保障水平對(duì)工資回報(bào)起到促進(jìn)作用。結(jié)合研究結(jié)論,提出相關(guān)政策建議。第一,推動(dòng)完善所有制改革,打破行業(yè)壟斷對(duì)市場(chǎng)經(jīng)濟(jì)的影響;第二,采取多種手段,縮小人力資本差距;第三,促進(jìn)勞動(dòng)力合理流動(dòng),打破勞動(dòng)力職業(yè)流動(dòng)阻礙;第四,提高對(duì)勞動(dòng)者保障水平,更注重勞動(dòng)力的公平。
[Abstract]:With the reform of market mechanism, the absolute value of China's national income is increasing day by day. But our country national income still presents the big disparity. In order to promote the fairness of national income and build a harmonious society, we should attach great importance to the existence of income gap. This paper takes whether to consider the labor force occupational mobility as two different research angles, on the basis of theoretical research and literature research, using CLDS (2014) data to carry on the empirical analysis to study the labor market segmentation. The effect of different characteristics of human capital on the industry wage return is studied in order to explore the effect of different factors on the industry wage return. The results show that the differences of wage return between industries in our country are gradually decreasing, and the non-market factors such as the system affecting the return of wages in China are weakened. However, there are still obvious wage returns in different industries. Whether or not the effect of labor mobility is taken into account, the labor market segmentation has a higher explanation for the industry wage return difference. Under the same human capital conditions, employees in monopolistic departments receive higher salary returns than those in competitive sectors. A high level of human capital will result in a higher return on wages. The occupational mobility of labor is significantly affected by ownership factors and negatively related to the return of wages in monopolistic sectors, that is, monopolists will get higher income, but the conclusion of competition sector is the opposite. The social security level of laborer plays a promoting role to salary return. Combined with the conclusions of the study, the relevant policy recommendations are put forward. First, to promote the improvement of ownership reform and to break the influence of trade monopolies on the market economy; second, to adopt various means to narrow the gap in human capital; third, to promote the rational flow of labor forces and break down the obstacles to the movement of labor forces; and fourth, to adopt various measures to narrow the gap in human capital; fourth, Improve the level of protection for workers, pay more attention to the fairness of the labor force.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：廣西大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：F249.24

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 胡博文;;城鄉(xiāng)勞動(dòng)者的工資差異研究:基于補(bǔ)償性工資差別理論[J];華東經(jīng)濟(jì)管理;2016年10期

2 張馳;葉光;;中國(guó)教育回報(bào)率的分布特征與收入差距——基于分位數(shù)回歸的經(jīng)驗(yàn)證據(jù)[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)經(jīng)緯;2016年01期

3 張龍;葛晶;;人力資本、行業(yè)特征與行業(yè)收入差距——基于中國(guó)家庭追蹤調(diào)查數(shù)據(jù)的研究[J];山西財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2015年11期

4 曾相崳;呂蘭婷;賀飛燕;;勞動(dòng)力跨行業(yè)流動(dòng)與工資上漲關(guān)系研究——對(duì)我國(guó)轉(zhuǎn)型期產(chǎn)業(yè)升級(jí)微觀數(shù)據(jù)的檢驗(yàn)[J];中國(guó)物價(jià);2015年09期

5 魏霽;;人力資本還是職業(yè)流動(dòng)?——農(nóng)民工工資增長(zhǎng)機(jī)制的一個(gè)實(shí)證研究[J];社會(huì)發(fā)展研究;2015年03期

6 鐘世川;;技術(shù)進(jìn)步偏向、勞動(dòng)力結(jié)構(gòu)與行業(yè)工資差距[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)經(jīng)緯;2015年04期

7 劉長(zhǎng)庚;張松彪;;行業(yè)壟斷與企業(yè)勞動(dòng)報(bào)酬差距——基于中國(guó)工業(yè)企業(yè)數(shù)據(jù)庫(kù)的分析[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)動(dòng)態(tài);2015年03期

8 邱兆林;;行業(yè)壟斷、異質(zhì)性人力資本與行業(yè)收入差距[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)與管理評(píng)論;2014年05期

9 孫文杰;沈坤榮;;全球化背景下中國(guó)行業(yè)間工資增長(zhǎng)差異的演變及其原因[J];數(shù)量經(jīng)濟(jì)技術(shù)經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2014年04期

10 陳享光;孫科;;行業(yè)間工資差距與行政性所有權(quán)壟斷的實(shí)證研究[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)縱橫;2013年11期

，

本文編號(hào)：2142950