本文選題：刑事訴訟　切入點(diǎn)：交叉詢(xún)問(wèn)　出處：《哈爾濱工業(yè)大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：我國(guó)2012年新修改的《刑事訴訟法》中初步引入控辯雙方交叉詢(xún)問(wèn)的舉證質(zhì)證模式,由控辯雙方通過(guò)舉證質(zhì)證等一系列程序,推動(dòng)庭審進(jìn)行的證據(jù)調(diào)查方式,但在立法與司法實(shí)踐中此種證人詢(xún)問(wèn)模式并未真正的發(fā)揮作用。對(duì)比研究英國(guó)、美國(guó)、德國(guó)日本及臺(tái)灣地區(qū)的幾種證人詢(xún)問(wèn)模式,反映出我國(guó)交叉詢(xún)問(wèn)制度在理念與文化層面中存在的問(wèn)題。按照國(guó)際刑事法院程序正義的標(biāo)準(zhǔn),交叉詢(xún)問(wèn)是法治社會(huì)保障人權(quán)與價(jià)值的具體制度,同時(shí)也符合我國(guó)“以事實(shí)為依據(jù),以法律為準(zhǔn)繩”的基本訴訟原則。刑事訴訟的目的在于懲戒犯罪實(shí)現(xiàn)國(guó)家刑罰權(quán),而實(shí)現(xiàn)刑罰權(quán)要以事實(shí)為依據(jù)以真實(shí)為基礎(chǔ)。如今世界上的大多數(shù)國(guó)家都在積極探索還原案件真實(shí)的方法,論文將在兩大法系的互相交融與我國(guó)司法改革的大背景之下,對(duì)于我國(guó)刑事訴訟交叉詢(xún)問(wèn)制度的重構(gòu)展開(kāi)初步探討,進(jìn)而探索交叉詢(xún)問(wèn)的理論價(jià)值、實(shí)質(zhì)價(jià)值、人權(quán)保障價(jià)值,從而達(dá)到發(fā)現(xiàn)案件真實(shí)、維護(hù)程序正義、實(shí)現(xiàn)實(shí)體正義的目的。對(duì)比我國(guó)傳統(tǒng)訴訟的歷史演變進(jìn)程,分析當(dāng)今證人詢(xún)問(wèn)制度的原因,提出交叉詢(xún)問(wèn)的程序規(guī)則和相應(yīng)配套性措施,包括陪審制度、辯護(hù)制度、法官制度、證人出庭作證制度以及審前準(zhǔn)備程序等制度,以期真正發(fā)揮交叉詢(xún)問(wèn)制度發(fā)現(xiàn)案件真實(shí)之功效。
[Abstract]:In our country's newly amended Criminal procedure Law in 2012, the mode of cross-examination of evidence between the prosecution and the defence was initially introduced, and a series of procedures, such as cross-examination of evidence, were adopted by the prosecution and the defence to promote the way of evidence investigation carried out in court.However, in the legislative and judicial practice, this mode of witness interrogation has not really played a role.A comparative study of several witness interrogation modes in Britain, the United States, Germany, Japan and Taiwan reflects the problems in the concept and culture of the cross-examination system in China.According to the standard of procedural justice of the International Criminal Court, cross-inquiry is the concrete system of social security of human rights and value under the rule of law. At the same time, it is also in line with the basic procedural principle of "taking facts as the basis and the law as the yardstick" in our country.The purpose of the criminal procedure is to punish the crime to realize the state penalty right, and the realization of the penalty right should be based on the fact and the truth.Nowadays, most of the countries in the world are actively exploring ways to restore the truth of the case. The thesis will be in the background of the blending of the two legal systems and the judicial reform of our country.In order to find out the truth of the case and maintain the procedural justice, this paper discusses the reconstruction of the cross-examination system in criminal proceedings in China, and then explores the theoretical value, the substantive value and the human rights guarantee value of the cross-questioning system.To achieve the objective of substantive justice.This paper compares the historical evolution of traditional litigation in China, analyzes the reasons of the witness questioning system, and puts forward the procedural rules of cross-examination and corresponding supporting measures, including jury system, defense system, judge system, etc.The system of witness testifying in court and pretrial preparation procedure is expected to play the role of cross-examination system in discovering the truth of the case.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：哈爾濱工業(yè)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D925.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前8條

1 李鑫;;“審判中心”視角下我國(guó)證人“交叉詢(xún)問(wèn)”制度構(gòu)建[J];法制博覽;2016年18期

2 劉國(guó)慶;;論美國(guó)刑事證據(jù)法中的異議制度及啟示[J];中國(guó)刑事法雜志;2013年01期

3 龍宗智;;我國(guó)刑事庭審中人證調(diào)查的幾個(gè)問(wèn)題——以“交叉詢(xún)問(wèn)”問(wèn)題為中心[J];政法論壇;2008年05期

4 陳衛(wèi)東;王靜;;我國(guó)刑事庭審中交叉詢(xún)問(wèn)規(guī)則之重構(gòu)[J];人民檢察;2007年22期

5 陳健民;美國(guó)刑事訴訟中交叉詢(xún)問(wèn)的規(guī)則與技巧[J];法學(xué);2004年04期

6 宋健強(qiáng);對(duì)律師形象社會(huì)定位的探究[J];哈爾濱工業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2003年02期

7 胡波;也談我國(guó)的交叉詢(xún)問(wèn)制度[J];法學(xué)雜志;2002年06期

8 張衛(wèi)平;;交叉詢(xún)問(wèn)制:魅力與異境的尷尬[J];中外法學(xué);2001年02期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 孟慶達(dá);論我國(guó)刑事審判中交叉詢(xún)問(wèn)制度的完善[D];遼寧大學(xué);2016年

，

本文編號(hào)：1722970