巴基斯坦印度河平原地區(qū)農(nóng)用地拋荒與農(nóng)民對(duì)土地利用變化的認(rèn)知
發(fā)布時(shí)間:2021-04-28 02:41
Pakistan is an agrarian economy with an 18.5%share of agriculture in total GDP of the country.There is an excellent potential for the growth of the agricultural sector in Pakistan,but the performance of this sector is far below its potential level due to various factors.It has been observed that the farmers are abandoning the agricultural lands in Pakistan.Although at the initial stage the magnitude of land abandonment is not so large,the prospects of ALA do not look promising.Moreover,there is ...
【文章來源】:華中農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué)湖北省 211工程院校 教育部直屬院校
【文章頁數(shù)】:124 頁
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】:博士
【文章目錄】:
Abstract
1 INTRODUCTION
1.1 Background of the Study
1.2 Role of Agriculture in Pakistan’s Economy
1.3 Objectives of the Study
1.4 Importance of the Study
1.5 Scope and Limitations of the Study
1.6 Organization of the Dissertation
2 REVIEW OF LITERATURE
2.1 The Concept of LUC and ALA
2.2 Causes of LUC and ALA
2.3 Implications of LUC and ALA
2.3.1 Positive Implications of LUC and ALA
2.3.2 Negative Implications of LUC and ALA
2.4 Management Strategies for LUC and ALA
2.5 Literature Gap
3 MATERIALS AND METHODS
3.1 Definition and of Key Concepts
3.1.1 Agricultural Land Abandonment(ALA)
3.1.2 Land Use Changes(LUC)
3.2 Study Area
3.3 Data Collection
3.3.1 Secondary Data
3.3.2 Primary or Social Survey Data
3.3.3 Screening of data
3.3.4 Ethical Considerations
3.4 Analytical Approaches
3.4.1 Statistical and Econometric Analysis
3.4.2 Statistical Criteria
3.4.3 Testing the Behavior of Data
3.4.4 Testing the Heteroscedasticity
3.4.5 Testing the Multicollinearity
3.4.6 Forecasting Total Labor Force Employed in Agriculture
3.4.7 Logistic Regression Model
4 Descriptive Analysis on the Characteristics of Respondents
4.1 Demographic& Socioeconomic Characteristics of the Respondents in the Study Area
4.1.1 Age of Respondents
4.1.2 Education of Respondents
4.1.3 Family Size of Respondents
4.1.4 Farm Size of Respondents
4.1.5 Farming Experience of Respondents
4.1.6 Quality of Ground Water
4.1.7 Soil Characteristics
4.1.8 Income Distribution in Respondents
4.1.9 Basic living facilities for respondents
4.2 Summary of Socioeconomic Characteristics of Respondents
5 Perspectives of Land Use Change and Agricultural Land Abandonment
5.1 Introduction
5.2 Analytical Procedure
5.3 The Perspectives of Land Use Change and Agriculture Abandonment in Study Area
5.3.1 Possession of Land
5.3.2 Land Purchased
5.3.3 Land Sold
5.4 The Evidence of Land Use Change and Agriculture Abandonment in Study Area
5.4.1 Farmers’Perceptions about Landscape change and agricultural land abandonment
5.4.2 The Evidence of LUC and ALA from Historical Records
5.4.3 Abandoning the Agriculture Profession
5.5 Forecasting Total Labor Force Employed in Agriculture
5.5.1 Why to Forecast the Total Labor Force Employed in Agriculture?
5.5.2 Identification of the ARIMA Model
5.5.3 Estimation of the ARIMA Model
5.5.4 Diagnostic Checking
5.5.5 Forecasting Pakistan’s Labor Force Employed in Agriculture Sector
5.5.6 Forecasting the Sindh’s Total Labor Force Employed in Agriculture
5.6 Chapter Conclusions
6 Determinants of Land Use Change and Agricultural Land Abandonment
6.1 Introduction
6.2 Analytical Procedure
6.2.1 Farmers’Perceptions
6.2.2 The Impact of Various Factors on Farmers’Decisions Regarding ALA
6.3 Farmers’Perceptions of the Drivers of Land Use Change and Agricultural Land Abandonment
6.3.1 Socio-economic factors
6.3.2 Ecological factors
6.3.3 Political Factors
6.4 The Impact of Socioeconomic Characteristics of Farmers’on Decisions of Selling the Agricultural Land
6.4.1 Results of Heteroscedasticity Test
6.4.2 Results of Multicollinearity test
6.4.3 Results of the Logistic Regression Model
6.5 Prospects for Future Agricultural Land
6.6 Chapter Conclusions
7 Implications of Land Use Change and Agricultural Land Abandonment in the Study Area
7.1 Introduction
7.2 Analytical Procedure
7.3 Farmers’Perceptions of the Implications of LUC and ALA
7.3.1 Socio-economic Effects
7.3.2 Ecological or Environmental Effects
7.4 Chapter Conclusions
8 Summary,Conclusion and Policy Recommendations
8.1 Summary and Conclusions
8.2 Policy Recommendations
REFERENCES
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
【參考文獻(xiàn)】:
期刊論文
[1]山區(qū)耕地邊際化特征及其動(dòng)因與政策含義(英文)[J]. 邵景安,張仕超,李秀彬. Journal of Geographical Sciences. 2015(06)
[2]農(nóng)業(yè)多功能性評(píng)價(jià)研究進(jìn)展[J]. 彭建,劉志聰,劉焱序. 中國(guó)農(nóng)業(yè)資源與區(qū)劃. 2014(06)
[3]土地利用變化對(duì)區(qū)域碳源匯的影響研究進(jìn)展[J]. 馬曉哲,王錚. 生態(tài)學(xué)報(bào). 2015(17)
[4]重慶市武隆縣農(nóng)地流轉(zhuǎn)下農(nóng)業(yè)勞動(dòng)力對(duì)耕地撂荒的不同尺度影響[J]. 張英,李秀彬,宋偉,史鐵丑. 地理科學(xué)進(jìn)展. 2014(04)
[5]森林轉(zhuǎn)型、農(nóng)地邊際化與生態(tài)恢復(fù)[J]. 李秀彬,趙宇鸞. 中國(guó)人口.資源與環(huán)境. 2011(10)
[6]農(nóng)業(yè)勞動(dòng)力機(jī)會(huì)成本上升對(duì)農(nóng)地利用的影響——以寧夏回族自治區(qū)為例[J]. 田玉軍,李秀彬,辛良杰,馬國(guó)霞,李占明. 自然資源學(xué)報(bào). 2009(03)
[7]惠農(nóng)政策下丘陵山區(qū)農(nóng)地邊際化的理論分析與實(shí)證——以湖北省通城縣為例[J]. 定光平,劉成武,黃利民. 地理研究. 2009(01)
[8]我國(guó)農(nóng)地拋荒的現(xiàn)狀·原因及對(duì)策[J]. 韓立達(dá),陳衛(wèi)宜. 安徽農(nóng)業(yè)科學(xué). 2008(29)
[9]農(nóng)地邊際化的表現(xiàn)特征及其診斷標(biāo)準(zhǔn)[J]. 劉成武,李秀彬. 地理科學(xué)進(jìn)展. 2005(02)
本文編號(hào):3164643
【文章來源】:華中農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué)湖北省 211工程院校 教育部直屬院校
【文章頁數(shù)】:124 頁
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】:博士
【文章目錄】:
Abstract
1 INTRODUCTION
1.1 Background of the Study
1.2 Role of Agriculture in Pakistan’s Economy
1.3 Objectives of the Study
1.4 Importance of the Study
1.5 Scope and Limitations of the Study
1.6 Organization of the Dissertation
2 REVIEW OF LITERATURE
2.1 The Concept of LUC and ALA
2.2 Causes of LUC and ALA
2.3 Implications of LUC and ALA
2.3.1 Positive Implications of LUC and ALA
2.3.2 Negative Implications of LUC and ALA
2.4 Management Strategies for LUC and ALA
2.5 Literature Gap
3 MATERIALS AND METHODS
3.1 Definition and of Key Concepts
3.1.1 Agricultural Land Abandonment(ALA)
3.1.2 Land Use Changes(LUC)
3.2 Study Area
3.3 Data Collection
3.3.1 Secondary Data
3.3.2 Primary or Social Survey Data
3.3.3 Screening of data
3.3.4 Ethical Considerations
3.4 Analytical Approaches
3.4.1 Statistical and Econometric Analysis
3.4.2 Statistical Criteria
3.4.3 Testing the Behavior of Data
3.4.4 Testing the Heteroscedasticity
3.4.5 Testing the Multicollinearity
3.4.6 Forecasting Total Labor Force Employed in Agriculture
3.4.7 Logistic Regression Model
4 Descriptive Analysis on the Characteristics of Respondents
4.1 Demographic& Socioeconomic Characteristics of the Respondents in the Study Area
4.1.1 Age of Respondents
4.1.2 Education of Respondents
4.1.3 Family Size of Respondents
4.1.4 Farm Size of Respondents
4.1.5 Farming Experience of Respondents
4.1.6 Quality of Ground Water
4.1.7 Soil Characteristics
4.1.8 Income Distribution in Respondents
4.1.9 Basic living facilities for respondents
4.2 Summary of Socioeconomic Characteristics of Respondents
5 Perspectives of Land Use Change and Agricultural Land Abandonment
5.1 Introduction
5.2 Analytical Procedure
5.3 The Perspectives of Land Use Change and Agriculture Abandonment in Study Area
5.3.1 Possession of Land
5.3.2 Land Purchased
5.3.3 Land Sold
5.4 The Evidence of Land Use Change and Agriculture Abandonment in Study Area
5.4.1 Farmers’Perceptions about Landscape change and agricultural land abandonment
5.4.2 The Evidence of LUC and ALA from Historical Records
5.4.3 Abandoning the Agriculture Profession
5.5 Forecasting Total Labor Force Employed in Agriculture
5.5.1 Why to Forecast the Total Labor Force Employed in Agriculture?
5.5.2 Identification of the ARIMA Model
5.5.3 Estimation of the ARIMA Model
5.5.4 Diagnostic Checking
5.5.5 Forecasting Pakistan’s Labor Force Employed in Agriculture Sector
5.5.6 Forecasting the Sindh’s Total Labor Force Employed in Agriculture
5.6 Chapter Conclusions
6 Determinants of Land Use Change and Agricultural Land Abandonment
6.1 Introduction
6.2 Analytical Procedure
6.2.1 Farmers’Perceptions
6.2.2 The Impact of Various Factors on Farmers’Decisions Regarding ALA
6.3 Farmers’Perceptions of the Drivers of Land Use Change and Agricultural Land Abandonment
6.3.1 Socio-economic factors
6.3.2 Ecological factors
6.3.3 Political Factors
6.4 The Impact of Socioeconomic Characteristics of Farmers’on Decisions of Selling the Agricultural Land
6.4.1 Results of Heteroscedasticity Test
6.4.2 Results of Multicollinearity test
6.4.3 Results of the Logistic Regression Model
6.5 Prospects for Future Agricultural Land
6.6 Chapter Conclusions
7 Implications of Land Use Change and Agricultural Land Abandonment in the Study Area
7.1 Introduction
7.2 Analytical Procedure
7.3 Farmers’Perceptions of the Implications of LUC and ALA
7.3.1 Socio-economic Effects
7.3.2 Ecological or Environmental Effects
7.4 Chapter Conclusions
8 Summary,Conclusion and Policy Recommendations
8.1 Summary and Conclusions
8.2 Policy Recommendations
REFERENCES
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
【參考文獻(xiàn)】:
期刊論文
[1]山區(qū)耕地邊際化特征及其動(dòng)因與政策含義(英文)[J]. 邵景安,張仕超,李秀彬. Journal of Geographical Sciences. 2015(06)
[2]農(nóng)業(yè)多功能性評(píng)價(jià)研究進(jìn)展[J]. 彭建,劉志聰,劉焱序. 中國(guó)農(nóng)業(yè)資源與區(qū)劃. 2014(06)
[3]土地利用變化對(duì)區(qū)域碳源匯的影響研究進(jìn)展[J]. 馬曉哲,王錚. 生態(tài)學(xué)報(bào). 2015(17)
[4]重慶市武隆縣農(nóng)地流轉(zhuǎn)下農(nóng)業(yè)勞動(dòng)力對(duì)耕地撂荒的不同尺度影響[J]. 張英,李秀彬,宋偉,史鐵丑. 地理科學(xué)進(jìn)展. 2014(04)
[5]森林轉(zhuǎn)型、農(nóng)地邊際化與生態(tài)恢復(fù)[J]. 李秀彬,趙宇鸞. 中國(guó)人口.資源與環(huán)境. 2011(10)
[6]農(nóng)業(yè)勞動(dòng)力機(jī)會(huì)成本上升對(duì)農(nóng)地利用的影響——以寧夏回族自治區(qū)為例[J]. 田玉軍,李秀彬,辛良杰,馬國(guó)霞,李占明. 自然資源學(xué)報(bào). 2009(03)
[7]惠農(nóng)政策下丘陵山區(qū)農(nóng)地邊際化的理論分析與實(shí)證——以湖北省通城縣為例[J]. 定光平,劉成武,黃利民. 地理研究. 2009(01)
[8]我國(guó)農(nóng)地拋荒的現(xiàn)狀·原因及對(duì)策[J]. 韓立達(dá),陳衛(wèi)宜. 安徽農(nóng)業(yè)科學(xué). 2008(29)
[9]農(nóng)地邊際化的表現(xiàn)特征及其診斷標(biāo)準(zhǔn)[J]. 劉成武,李秀彬. 地理科學(xué)進(jìn)展. 2005(02)
本文編號(hào):3164643
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/shekelunwen/sannong/3164643.html
最近更新
教材專著