本文關(guān)鍵詞：城鄉(xiāng)統(tǒng)籌視角下我國(guó)農(nóng)民收入增長(zhǎng)問(wèn)題研究，由筆耕文化傳播整理發(fā)布。

        “三農(nóng)”問(wèn)題的實(shí)質(zhì)是農(nóng)民的收入增長(zhǎng)問(wèn)題①。歷史的經(jīng)驗(yàn)和現(xiàn)實(shí)的情況表明,解決農(nóng)民增收問(wèn)題單靠農(nóng)民自身或“三農(nóng)”內(nèi)部是不可能實(shí)現(xiàn)的,而是要在“三農(nóng)”外部想辦法,或者立足“三農(nóng)”,放眼農(nóng)外,充分發(fā)揮“工業(yè)反哺農(nóng)業(yè)”和“城市支持鄉(xiāng)村”的重大作用,統(tǒng)籌城鄉(xiāng)發(fā)展,才能徹底解決“三農(nóng)”問(wèn)題�；谏鲜隹紤],本文綜合應(yīng)用農(nóng)業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)、政治經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)、宏微觀經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)、福利經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)、發(fā)展經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)、制度經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)、以及計(jì)量經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)的有關(guān)理論方法,建立了一個(gè)促進(jìn)農(nóng)民收入有效增收經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)理論框架。農(nóng)民收入由工資性收入、經(jīng)營(yíng)性收入、財(cái)產(chǎn)性收入、轉(zhuǎn)移性收入四個(gè)部分構(gòu)成,各個(gè)構(gòu)成部分的增長(zhǎng)情況各不相同,對(duì)城鄉(xiāng)居民收入差距的影響也不同。經(jīng)過(guò)分析我們發(fā)現(xiàn),工資性收入對(duì)城鄉(xiāng)居民收入差距的作用最大,截至2010年,工資性收入對(duì)城鄉(xiāng)居民收入差距的貢獻(xiàn)率還高達(dá)78.2%。接下來(lái)依次是轉(zhuǎn)移性收入、財(cái)產(chǎn)性收入、經(jīng)營(yíng)性收入。而四個(gè)構(gòu)成部分中,分配最不平均的是城鄉(xiāng)居民之間的轉(zhuǎn)移性收入,在2000-2010年11年間,代表轉(zhuǎn)移性收入分配不平均程度的集中率指標(biāo)有6年大于50%,余下5年轉(zhuǎn)移性收入的集中率也都大于40%；經(jīng)營(yíng)性收入對(duì)城鄉(xiāng)居民收入差距的貢獻(xiàn)率為負(fù)值,2010年,這個(gè)貢獻(xiàn)率為-7.13%,即農(nóng)村居民該項(xiàng)收入水平反而微高于城鎮(zhèn)居民。農(nóng)民收入各構(gòu)成部分的增長(zhǎng)情況不同,解決的辦法也不同。因此,本文對(duì)農(nóng)民收入四個(gè)構(gòu)成部分分別進(jìn)行了研究,找出了促進(jìn)農(nóng)民工資性、經(jīng)營(yíng)性、財(cái)產(chǎn)性、轉(zhuǎn)移性等方面收入有效增長(zhǎng)的核心手段和關(guān)鍵突破口。它們分別是：做好農(nóng)村剩余勞動(dòng)力轉(zhuǎn)移就業(yè),當(dāng)前特別要做好農(nóng)村剩余勞動(dòng)力轉(zhuǎn)移就業(yè)的戰(zhàn)略性調(diào)整；大力發(fā)展農(nóng)村專業(yè)合作經(jīng)濟(jì)組織；推動(dòng)農(nóng)村土地有效流轉(zhuǎn)；大力實(shí)施并科學(xué)有效地做好國(guó)家財(cái)政支農(nóng)支出等。一、從農(nóng)村剩余勞動(dòng)力轉(zhuǎn)移就業(yè)入手研究農(nóng)民工資性收入增長(zhǎng)問(wèn)題本文通過(guò)理論分析,論證了城鄉(xiāng)統(tǒng)籌視角下做好農(nóng)村剩余勞動(dòng)力轉(zhuǎn)移就業(yè)能夠?qū)崿F(xiàn)農(nóng)村勞動(dòng)者收入的工資化,能夠消除城鄉(xiāng)收入差距,能夠減小農(nóng)民因素質(zhì)偏低而造成的收入增長(zhǎng)的內(nèi)生缺憾,能夠促進(jìn)農(nóng)民增收、農(nóng)村工業(yè)化以及國(guó)民經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)的協(xié)調(diào)發(fā)展,最終有效提升農(nóng)民的工資性收入水平。接著,經(jīng)過(guò)估算,本文得出到2011年末,我國(guó)農(nóng)村剩余勞動(dòng)力約為7745萬(wàn)人。繼續(xù)做好這部分剩余勞動(dòng)力的轉(zhuǎn)移就業(yè)對(duì)提高農(nóng)民工資性收入將具有重要的現(xiàn)實(shí)意義。然而,轉(zhuǎn)移出去的農(nóng)村剩余勞動(dòng)力長(zhǎng)期以來(lái)都是異地就業(yè),加上轉(zhuǎn)移的剩余勞動(dòng)力在年齡結(jié)構(gòu)、地區(qū)結(jié)構(gòu)等方面的問(wèn)題,已經(jīng)給我國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)社會(huì)帶來(lái)了一系列的問(wèn)題。如相當(dāng)一部分省市農(nóng)村勞動(dòng)力資源嚴(yán)重缺乏,“留守婦女”、“留守子女”群體、家庭的分隔、子女隔代管教等引發(fā)的農(nóng)村社會(huì)空洞化問(wèn)題,大量農(nóng)村剩余勞動(dòng)力異地轉(zhuǎn)移還導(dǎo)致了中國(guó)整體上的低工資,導(dǎo)致了沿海地區(qū)產(chǎn)業(yè)升級(jí)和技術(shù)創(chuàng)新滯緩,從長(zhǎng)遠(yuǎn)看還會(huì)導(dǎo)致區(qū)域發(fā)展差距的拉大,等等。當(dāng)然,這些問(wèn)題的出現(xiàn)并不能否定農(nóng)村剩余勞動(dòng)力轉(zhuǎn)移就業(yè)的正面作用,只是我們要順應(yīng)新的歷史形勢(shì),進(jìn)一步做好農(nóng)村剩余勞動(dòng)力轉(zhuǎn)移就業(yè)工作。最后,經(jīng)過(guò)深入分析,我們發(fā)現(xiàn)當(dāng)前我國(guó)農(nóng)村剩余勞動(dòng)力轉(zhuǎn)移正處于由異地轉(zhuǎn)移為主向由就地轉(zhuǎn)移為主的規(guī)律性轉(zhuǎn)變,加之東部沿海發(fā)達(dá)省市的工業(yè)產(chǎn)業(yè)正向中西部地區(qū)梯度轉(zhuǎn)移。我們認(rèn)為我國(guó)農(nóng)村剩余勞動(dòng)力轉(zhuǎn)移就業(yè)的戰(zhàn)略性調(diào)整勢(shì)在必行。為此,本文從推進(jìn)農(nóng)村新型工業(yè)化、發(fā)展城鎮(zhèn)化、以及建立健全城鄉(xiāng)統(tǒng)籌的勞動(dòng)力就業(yè)機(jī)制等方面提出了促進(jìn)農(nóng)民剩余勞動(dòng)力轉(zhuǎn)移就業(yè)戰(zhàn)略性調(diào)整的對(duì)策建議。二、從發(fā)展農(nóng)村專業(yè)合作經(jīng)濟(jì)組織入手研究農(nóng)民經(jīng)營(yíng)性收入增長(zhǎng)問(wèn)題本文依次從政治經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)的角度、統(tǒng)籌城鄉(xiāng)發(fā)展的角度、農(nóng)業(yè)產(chǎn)業(yè)化經(jīng)營(yíng)的角度、以及提升農(nóng)業(yè)科技水平的視角深入論述了大力發(fā)展農(nóng)村專業(yè)合作經(jīng)濟(jì)組織是有效提升農(nóng)民的經(jīng)營(yíng)性收入水平的核心和關(guān)鍵突破口。當(dāng)前,我國(guó)農(nóng)村專業(yè)合作經(jīng)濟(jì)組織正處于深化和加速發(fā)展階段。截至2010年,全國(guó)農(nóng)村各類專業(yè)合作組織有21萬(wàn)多個(gè),擁有農(nóng)民專業(yè)合作社的村占同期村民委員會(huì)總數(shù)的30.8%左右。參加組織的農(nóng)民成員3486萬(wàn)人(戶),占鄉(xiāng)村農(nóng)戶總數(shù)的13.8%。進(jìn)一步地,本文通過(guò)分析四川省資陽(yáng)、眉山、遂寧3市畜牧養(yǎng)殖專業(yè)合作社發(fā)展情況,深入論證了農(nóng)村專業(yè)合作經(jīng)濟(jì)組織對(duì)提高農(nóng)民經(jīng)營(yíng)性收入的重要作用。在2010年生豬價(jià)格持續(xù)下跌的情況下,資陽(yáng)、遂寧、眉山3市參加生豬專業(yè)合作的農(nóng)民人均畜牧業(yè)現(xiàn)金收入仍比2006年分別增長(zhǎng)77.47%、200.84%、80.82%,高于全省平均增幅。對(duì)300個(gè)養(yǎng)殖專業(yè)合作社的問(wèn)卷調(diào)查顯示,有72.3%的農(nóng)戶認(rèn)為參加合作社后養(yǎng)殖業(yè)收入大大提高,效益明顯；有22.2%的農(nóng)戶認(rèn)為收入有一定的提高,兩項(xiàng)相加高達(dá)94.5%。通過(guò)對(duì)四川省資陽(yáng)、眉山、遂寧三市農(nóng)村專業(yè)合作社發(fā)展情況的深入研究,我們發(fā)現(xiàn)總結(jié)了3市在發(fā)展農(nóng)村專業(yè)合作社過(guò)程中形成的幾種以農(nóng)村專業(yè)合作社為紐帶的具有較大創(chuàng)新的利益聯(lián)結(jié)模式,包括“六方合作+保險(xiǎn)”模式、“公司+合作社+農(nóng)戶”模式、“龍頭企業(yè)+合作社+養(yǎng)殖戶+銀行”模式、“公司+協(xié)會(huì)+基地+農(nóng)戶”模式等。在這些模式下,農(nóng)村專業(yè)合作社有效地發(fā)揮了促農(nóng)增收的作用,顯著提高了農(nóng)民的經(jīng)營(yíng)性收入水平。當(dāng)然,3市在發(fā)展農(nóng)村專業(yè)合作社過(guò)程中也存在著一些問(wèn)題,為此,我們根據(jù)3市取得的經(jīng)驗(yàn)和存在的問(wèn)題,從創(chuàng)新推廣發(fā)展機(jī)制、加大扶持力度、加強(qiáng)培育指導(dǎo)等方面提出了進(jìn)一步發(fā)展和完善我國(guó)農(nóng)村專業(yè)合作經(jīng)濟(jì)組織的對(duì)策建議。三、從農(nóng)村土地有效流轉(zhuǎn)入手研究農(nóng)民財(cái)產(chǎn)性收入增長(zhǎng)問(wèn)題本文先從理論上論證了農(nóng)村土地有效流轉(zhuǎn)對(duì)促進(jìn)農(nóng)民財(cái)產(chǎn)性收入增長(zhǎng)的必要性和重要性,突出了農(nóng)村土地有效流轉(zhuǎn)是提升農(nóng)民財(cái)產(chǎn)性收入水平的核心手段和關(guān)鍵突破口這一論斷�，F(xiàn)行土地法規(guī)和農(nóng)地征用制度在很大程度上限制了農(nóng)村土地的有效流轉(zhuǎn),造成了農(nóng)民土地財(cái)產(chǎn)的嚴(yán)重?fù)p失。為此,本文全面分析了當(dāng)前的土地制度對(duì)農(nóng)村土地財(cái)產(chǎn)收入的影響,并對(duì)土地征用中農(nóng)民利益流失的數(shù)量進(jìn)行了估算。估算得出,1978-2010年,農(nóng)民向社會(huì)無(wú)償貢獻(xiàn)的土地收益約為257827.33億元。緊接著,深入分析成都“試驗(yàn)區(qū)”農(nóng)村土地流轉(zhuǎn)的成效,從實(shí)踐上證實(shí)了農(nóng)村土地有效流轉(zhuǎn)對(duì)提高農(nóng)民財(cái)產(chǎn)性收入的顯著作用。同時(shí)我們還發(fā)現(xiàn)和總結(jié)了包括土地股份合作社、土地股份公司、“土地銀行”、業(yè)主租賃經(jīng)營(yíng)、“兩股一改”在內(nèi)的有效實(shí)現(xiàn)農(nóng)村土地流轉(zhuǎn)的典型模式。當(dāng)然,成都“試驗(yàn)區(qū)”在促進(jìn)農(nóng)村土地流轉(zhuǎn)過(guò)程中也存在著一些問(wèn)題,為此,我們根據(jù)取得的經(jīng)驗(yàn)和存在的問(wèn)題,從明確界定土地產(chǎn)權(quán)的權(quán)能、建立土地資產(chǎn)價(jià)格評(píng)估體系、建設(shè)土地使用權(quán)流轉(zhuǎn)市場(chǎng)、推廣土地經(jīng)營(yíng)權(quán)證券化、創(chuàng)新推廣農(nóng)村土地流轉(zhuǎn)的成功模式等方面提出了進(jìn)一步有效促進(jìn)我國(guó)農(nóng)村土地流轉(zhuǎn)的對(duì)策建議。四、從國(guó)家財(cái)政支農(nóng)支出入手研究農(nóng)民轉(zhuǎn)移性收入增長(zhǎng)問(wèn)題本文先從理論上論證了財(cái)政支農(nóng)投入對(duì)促進(jìn)農(nóng)民轉(zhuǎn)移性收入增長(zhǎng)的必要性和重要性,突出了大力實(shí)施并科學(xué)有效地做好國(guó)家財(cái)政支農(nóng)政策是提升農(nóng)民財(cái)產(chǎn)性收入水平的核心手段和關(guān)鍵突破口這一論斷。接著通過(guò)計(jì)量分析法構(gòu)建人均財(cái)政支農(nóng)規(guī)模與農(nóng)民人均純收入之間回歸方程式,回歸方程表明農(nóng)民收入對(duì)人均財(cái)政支農(nóng)規(guī)模的彈性約為0.448。即人均財(cái)政支農(nóng)投入每變動(dòng)1個(gè)百分點(diǎn)將導(dǎo)致當(dāng)期的農(nóng)民收入同向變動(dòng)約0.448個(gè)百分點(diǎn)。這說(shuō)明人均財(cái)政支農(nóng)支出對(duì)農(nóng)民收入有較強(qiáng)的正向促進(jìn)作用。緊接著,根據(jù)農(nóng)民收入年均增長(zhǎng)10%的目標(biāo),我們測(cè)算了未來(lái)30年內(nèi)我國(guó)財(cái)政支農(nóng)應(yīng)該保持年均增長(zhǎng)25%的增速這一結(jié)論。再接著,我們深入分析了財(cái)政支農(nóng)的結(jié)構(gòu)(即財(cái)政各主要支農(nóng)項(xiàng)目)對(duì)促農(nóng)增收的影響情況,得出了以糧棉油價(jià)格補(bǔ)貼為代表的財(cái)政補(bǔ)貼支出、農(nóng)業(yè)貸款等不論是對(duì)農(nóng)民直接收入還是對(duì)農(nóng)業(yè)生產(chǎn)都產(chǎn)生了負(fù)向作用；而支援農(nóng)村生產(chǎn)支出和各項(xiàng)農(nóng)業(yè)事業(yè)費(fèi)、科技投入不論是對(duì)農(nóng)民直接收入還是對(duì)農(nóng)業(yè)生產(chǎn)都具有明顯的正向作用。而國(guó)家財(cái)政在農(nóng)村社會(huì)事業(yè)發(fā)展費(fèi)用的支出和農(nóng)村基本建設(shè)的支出對(duì)農(nóng)業(yè)生產(chǎn)也具有較強(qiáng)的正向作用的基本結(jié)論。在上述分析的基礎(chǔ)上,我們以城鄉(xiāng)統(tǒng)籌為視角,從加大財(cái)政支農(nóng)力度、優(yōu)化財(cái)政支農(nóng)結(jié)構(gòu)、完善財(cái)政支農(nóng)政策和制度、規(guī)范財(cái)政支農(nóng)行為等方面提出了進(jìn)一步優(yōu)化財(cái)政支農(nóng)政策的對(duì)策建議。

    The essence of agriculture, rural areas, and farmers is farmers’income growth. The historical experience and reality shows that, depending only on the farmers themselves to solve farmer’s income problem is impossible, must the implement development strategy of urban and rural, thinking outside of farming basing on "3farming", giving full play to the "industry feeds back agriculture" and "city supports countryside".Based on the above consideration, this paper applied agricultural economics, political economy, macro and micro economics, welfare economics, development economics, institutional economics, as well as econometrics, and so on, to establish an effectively theoretical framework of economics to simulative farmers’ income increasing.Farmer income from wage income, operating income, property income, transfer income into four parts, each part of the growth circumstance are not identical, they have different effects to the income gap between urban and rural. After analysis, we derive that, the wage income gap of urban and rural residents’is the biggest, as of2010, the contribution rate of the wage income gap between urban and rural residents is high up to78.2%. Followed by transfer income, property income, operating income. Transfer income in between urban and rural residents assigned the average. In thell years of2000～2010,6years’transfer income of the concentration ratio is greater than50%, the remaining5years’ transfer income of the concentration ratio are all more than40%; The contribution rate of operating income on the income gap between urban and rural residents is negative,2010, the contribution rate is of-7.13%, namely the income level of rural residents have slightly higher than the urban residents’. The various components of farmer income is different for the growth, the solutions is also different. Therefore, this article also studies respectively on the farmers’income component.One, researching farmers’wage income growth basing on the transfer of rural surplus laborThis paper discusses the transfer of rural surplus labor is good for the rural laborer wage income, eliminating the income gap between urban and rural areas, reducing inside unripe shortcomings, promoting the increase of farmers’income, final effectively enhancing farmer’s income level.Then, after estimating, we come to the conclusion that, by the end of2011, China’s rural surplus labor force is about77450000people. Continue to do a good job in this part of the transfer of surplus labor force employment to increase farmers’ income will have important practical significance. However, transferred out of the surplus rural labor force has been the off-site employment, coupled with the transfer of surplus labor in the age structure, regional structure and other aspects of the problem of rural surplus labor force, long-term different transfer has to society of our country economy brings a series of problems. Of course, these problems do not deny the transfer of rural surplus labor force employment positive role, but we have to conform to the new historical situation, further improve the transfer of surplus rural labor force employment.Finally, thorough analysis, we found that the rural surplus labor transfer is regularity changing, at the same time the industry of the eastern coastal developed provinces is gradient transferring to center-west region of our country, the transfer strategic adjustment of rural surplus labor force is imperative. Therefore, this article put forward the countermeasure proposals to promote strategically adjustment of the rural surplus labor transferring from the advancing rural industrialization, urbanization, and establishing a sound development of urban and rural labor employment mechanism.Two, researching farmers’operating income growth problem based on the development of rural professional cooperative economic organizationThis article has discussed that developing the rural professional cooperative economic organization is the core and breach to enhance farmers operating income level effectively. From the point of view of political economy, balancing urban and rural development perspective, agricultural industrialization management perspective, promoting agricultural science and technology level, and so on.At present, China’s rural professional cooperative economic organizations are on deepened and accelerated developing stage. As of2010, three are more than 210000rural professional cooperation organizations in the country, the villages with professional cooperatives economic organizations is accounted for about30.8%of the total amount. The participated farmers is about34860000(households), accounting for13.8%of the total number of rural households. Further, we have deepen analysis of the animal husbandry professional cooperatives of Ziyang, Meishan, Suining in Sichuan Province, confirmed that the rural professional cooperative economic organization is important to improve the farmers’operating income.According to in-depth studying the development situation of the rural professional cooperatives of Ziyang, Meishan,Suining. We found and summarize several profit model, including "six party cooperation+insurance" mode,"the company+cooperation+farmer" mode,"bibcock enterprise+cooperation+farmers+bank" model,"company+association+base+farmer"mode. Under these modes, rural professional cooperation plays effectively the role of helping farmers increase income, improving farmers operating income level significantly.Of course, there are some problems in the process of the3cities’rural professional cooperatives; therefore, we put on the countermeasures of the further development and improvement of rural special cooperative economic organization in China according to3city the experience gained and existing problems.Three, researching the farmers’ property income growth problem based on the rural land circulation effectivelyThis paper firstly theoretically proves that the rural land circulation effectively is the necessity and importance to promote the farmers’property income growth, highlighting the judgment that the promotion of rural land circulation is the core of farmers’ property income level.The current land laws and land requisition system limits rural land to circulate effectively, resulting in severe loss of peasants’land property. Therefore, this paper has a comprehensive analysis of the current land system of rural land property income effects, and has an estimation of the loss of peasants’ interests in land commandeer quantity. Then, this paper has an in-depth analysis of Chengdu "test area" rural land circulation effect. At the same time we also found and summarized the rural land circulation model. Including the land share cooperation, land joint-stock company,"land bank", and the owners leasing business and so on. Of course, Chengdu "Experimental Zone" also exist some problems in promoting rural land circulation process, therefore, we puts forward the effective promotion of China rural land circulation countermeasure proposal. According to the experience and the existing problems.Four, researching transfer income problem based on the national fiscal expenditure.This paper first theoretically demonstrates the investment of finance support agriculture to promote the importance and necessity of famers’transfer income growth, and highlighting the judgment that promoting financial supporting agriculture is effective to enhance the farmers’ property income level.And then through the regression analysis method to establish the per capita financial supporting agriculture scale and net income of farmer average per capita between regression equation, regression equation shows that farmer income per capita of finance supporting agriculture scale elasticity is about0.448. The per capita investment of finance support agriculture changes each1percentage points will result in current farmer income to change the same about0.448percentage points, that per capita of fiscal expenditure for supporting agriculture to farmer income has stronger positive simulative effect. Then, according to farmer income average annual growth target of10%, we calculated the conclusion that the next30years of China’s fiscal expenditure should maintain an average annual growth rate of25%growth.Then, we analyzed the structure of supporting agriculture in Finance (finance major support agriculture project) to promote agricultural income influence situation, reached to grain price subsidies as the representative of the fiscal subsidies, agricultural loans regardless of direct to the farmer income of agricultural production is still a negative role; and support for rural production expenditure and the agricultural operating expenses, investment of science and technology regardless of direct to the farmer income and agricultural production has significant positive effect on agricultural economic growth. While the national finance in rural social development expenses and rural basic construction expenditure on agricultural production also has a strong positive effect.On the basis of the analysis above, we put forward the countermeasures proposal from increasing strength of financial support; optimizing the structure of fiscal support for agriculture, improving the policy and system of finance support agriculture; normative behavior in such aspects as the perspective further simulative farmers’income.

城鄉(xiāng)統(tǒng)籌視角下我國(guó)農(nóng)民收入增長(zhǎng)問(wèn)題研究

內(nèi)容摘要4-8Abstract8-121. 導(dǎo)論18-32    1.1 引言18-20        1.1.1 研究背景18-19        1.1.2 研究目的和意義19-20    1.2 國(guó)內(nèi)外研究動(dòng)態(tài)20-27        1.2.1 國(guó)外研究動(dòng)態(tài)20-23        1.2.2 國(guó)內(nèi)研究動(dòng)態(tài)23-27    1.3 論文的研究結(jié)構(gòu)及研究方法27-30        1.3.1 研究結(jié)構(gòu)27-29        1.3.2 研究方法29-30    1.4 論文的創(chuàng)新與不足之處30-32        1.4.1 論文的創(chuàng)新30-31        1.4.2 論文的不足之處31-322. 理論基礎(chǔ)32-39    2.1 基本概念的界定32-33        2.1.1 農(nóng)民的概念界定32        2.1.2 農(nóng)民收入32-33        2.1.3 農(nóng)民收入增長(zhǎng)的概念界定33        2.1.4 城鄉(xiāng)的概念界定33        2.1.5 城鄉(xiāng)統(tǒng)籌的概念界定33    2.2 馬克思關(guān)于城鄉(xiāng)及工農(nóng)關(guān)系的闡述33-34    2.3 統(tǒng)籌城鄉(xiāng)發(fā)展與科學(xué)發(fā)展觀34-35    2.4 統(tǒng)籌城鄉(xiāng)發(fā)展與農(nóng)業(yè)發(fā)展方式轉(zhuǎn)變35    2.5 城鄉(xiāng)統(tǒng)籌與福利經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)收入分配理論35-36    2.6 城鄉(xiāng)統(tǒng)籌與“更加注重社會(huì)公平”的價(jià)值取向36-37    2.7 城鄉(xiāng)統(tǒng)籌的基本原則37-393. 我國(guó)農(nóng)民收入現(xiàn)狀及選擇城鄉(xiāng)統(tǒng)籌途徑的必然性39-52    3.1 我國(guó)農(nóng)民收入的階段特征及現(xiàn)狀分析39-42        3.1.1 改革開(kāi)放以來(lái)我國(guó)農(nóng)民收入增長(zhǎng)的階段性特征39-40        3.1.2 我國(guó)農(nóng)民收入增長(zhǎng)的現(xiàn)狀分析40-42    3.2 基于差值法的城鄉(xiāng)居民收入差距分解42-49        3.2.1 收入差距的差值法測(cè)度42-44        3.2.2 各項(xiàng)收入流變化對(duì)城鄉(xiāng)收入差距的影響44-49    3.3 城鄉(xiāng)統(tǒng)籌對(duì)解決我國(guó)農(nóng)民收入增長(zhǎng)問(wèn)題的必然性分析49-52        3.3.1 實(shí)施統(tǒng)籌城鄉(xiāng)發(fā)展戰(zhàn)略是歷史的必然選擇49        3.3.2 實(shí)施統(tǒng)籌城鄉(xiāng)發(fā)展戰(zhàn)略是縮小城鄉(xiāng)收入差距的內(nèi)在要求49-50        3.3.3 城鄉(xiāng)統(tǒng)籌在促農(nóng)增收中的重要作用50-524. 城鄉(xiāng)統(tǒng)籌視角下農(nóng)民工資性收入增長(zhǎng)研究——基于農(nóng)村剩余勞動(dòng)力轉(zhuǎn)移就業(yè)的分析52-69    4.1 農(nóng)民工資性收入與農(nóng)村剩余勞動(dòng)力的概念界定52-53        4.1.1 農(nóng)民工資性收入的概念界定52-53        4.1.2 農(nóng)村剩余勞動(dòng)力的概念界定53    4.2 農(nóng)村勞動(dòng)力轉(zhuǎn)移就業(yè)對(duì)農(nóng)民的收入增長(zhǎng)效應(yīng)53-55        4.2.1 實(shí)現(xiàn)農(nóng)村勞動(dòng)者收入的工資化53-54        4.2.2 消除城鄉(xiāng)收入差距54        4.2.3 減小農(nóng)民收入增長(zhǎng)的內(nèi)生缺憾54-55        4.2.4 推動(dòng)農(nóng)村新型工業(yè)化,擴(kuò)大農(nóng)民增收空間55    4.3 我國(guó)農(nóng)村剩余勞動(dòng)力轉(zhuǎn)移現(xiàn)狀分析55-61        4.3.1 改革開(kāi)放以來(lái),我國(guó)農(nóng)村剩余勞動(dòng)力轉(zhuǎn)移階段性特征分析55-56        4.3.2 我國(guó)當(dāng)前農(nóng)村勞動(dòng)力剩余數(shù)量估算56-59        4.3.3 我國(guó)農(nóng)村剩余勞動(dòng)力轉(zhuǎn)移現(xiàn)狀特征及存在的問(wèn)題59-61    4.4 城鄉(xiāng)統(tǒng)籌視角下的農(nóng)村剩余勞動(dòng)力轉(zhuǎn)移戰(zhàn)略調(diào)整61-69        4.4.1 農(nóng)村剩余勞動(dòng)力轉(zhuǎn)移戰(zhàn)略性調(diào)整的客觀必然性61-64        4.4.2 城鄉(xiāng)統(tǒng)籌視角下農(nóng)村剩余勞動(dòng)力轉(zhuǎn)移戰(zhàn)略調(diào)整的路徑選擇64-695. 城鄉(xiāng)統(tǒng)籌視角下農(nóng)民經(jīng)營(yíng)性收入增長(zhǎng)研究——基于農(nóng)村專業(yè)合作經(jīng)濟(jì)組織的分析69-91    5.1 農(nóng)民經(jīng)營(yíng)性收入和農(nóng)村專業(yè)合作經(jīng)濟(jì)組織的概念界定70        5.1.1 農(nóng)民經(jīng)營(yíng)性收入的概念界定70        5.1.2 農(nóng)村專業(yè)合作經(jīng)濟(jì)組織的概念界定70    5.2 經(jīng)營(yíng)性收入增長(zhǎng)對(duì)農(nóng)村專業(yè)合作經(jīng)濟(jì)組織的需求分析70-75        5.2.1 發(fā)展農(nóng)村專業(yè)合作經(jīng)濟(jì)組織的政治經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)分析70-72        5.2.2 發(fā)展農(nóng)村專業(yè)合作經(jīng)濟(jì)組織是統(tǒng)籌城鄉(xiāng)發(fā)展的歷史性選擇72-74        5.2.3 發(fā)展農(nóng)村專業(yè)合作經(jīng)濟(jì)組織是我國(guó)走農(nóng)業(yè)產(chǎn)業(yè)化經(jīng)營(yíng)道路的必然選擇74        5.2.4 農(nóng)村專業(yè)合作經(jīng)濟(jì)組織是提升農(nóng)業(yè)科技水平的重要載體74-75    5.3 我國(guó)農(nóng)民經(jīng)營(yíng)性收入的結(jié)構(gòu)性分析75-76    5.4 我國(guó)農(nóng)村專業(yè)合作經(jīng)濟(jì)組織的發(fā)展歷史和現(xiàn)狀76-78        5.4.1 改革開(kāi)放以來(lái)我國(guó)農(nóng)村專業(yè)合作經(jīng)濟(jì)組織發(fā)展的歷程76-77        5.4.2 我國(guó)農(nóng)村專業(yè)合作經(jīng)濟(jì)組織的發(fā)展現(xiàn)狀77-78    5.5 四川資陽(yáng)、眉山、遂寧3市農(nóng)村專業(yè)合作經(jīng)濟(jì)組織發(fā)展經(jīng)驗(yàn)初探78-87        5.5.1 資陽(yáng)、眉山、遂寧3市農(nóng)村專業(yè)合作社發(fā)展的經(jīng)驗(yàn)分析78-80        5.5.2 3市以農(nóng)民專業(yè)合作社為紐帶的利益聯(lián)結(jié)創(chuàng)新模式分析80-84        5.5.3 3市農(nóng)村養(yǎng)殖專業(yè)合作社促農(nóng)增收的內(nèi)在機(jī)制分析84-86        5.5.4 3市養(yǎng)殖專業(yè)合作經(jīng)濟(jì)組織發(fā)展面臨的主要矛盾和問(wèn)題86-87    5.6 統(tǒng)籌城鄉(xiāng)發(fā)展視角下的農(nóng)村專業(yè)合作經(jīng)濟(jì)組織建設(shè)87-91        5.6.1 創(chuàng)新推廣發(fā)展機(jī)制87-88        5.6.2 不斷加大扶持力度88-89        5.6.3 切實(shí)加強(qiáng)培育指導(dǎo)89-916. 城鄉(xiāng)統(tǒng)籌視角下農(nóng)民財(cái)產(chǎn)性收入增長(zhǎng)研究——基于農(nóng)村土地流轉(zhuǎn)的分析91-109    6.1 農(nóng)民財(cái)產(chǎn)性收入及農(nóng)村土地流轉(zhuǎn)的概念界定91-92        6.1.1 農(nóng)民財(cái)產(chǎn)性收入的概念界定91-92        6.1.2 農(nóng)村土地流轉(zhuǎn)的概念界定92    6.2 財(cái)產(chǎn)性收入對(duì)土地流轉(zhuǎn)的需求分析92-93        6.2.1 農(nóng)村土地流轉(zhuǎn)對(duì)促進(jìn)農(nóng)民財(cái)產(chǎn)性收入增長(zhǎng)的必要性92-93        6.2.2 農(nóng)村土地有效流轉(zhuǎn)對(duì)農(nóng)民財(cái)產(chǎn)性收入增長(zhǎng)的重要性93    6.3 我國(guó)農(nóng)民財(cái)產(chǎn)性收入的現(xiàn)狀分析93-95    6.4 土地制度對(duì)農(nóng)民土地財(cái)產(chǎn)收入的影響95-98        6.4.1 現(xiàn)行土地法規(guī)的問(wèn)題95-97        6.4.2 農(nóng)地征用制度的問(wèn)題97        6.4.3 土地征用中發(fā)生的農(nóng)民利益流失：量的估算97-98    6.5 政府城鄉(xiāng)統(tǒng)籌主導(dǎo)下的農(nóng)村土地流轉(zhuǎn)經(jīng)驗(yàn)分析——基于成都“試驗(yàn)區(qū)”的調(diào)查研究98-105        6.5.1 成都“試驗(yàn)區(qū)”土地流轉(zhuǎn)的典型模式99-103        6.5.2 成都“試驗(yàn)區(qū)”土地流轉(zhuǎn)的成就及經(jīng)驗(yàn)分析103-104        6.5.3 成都“試驗(yàn)區(qū)”土地流轉(zhuǎn)中存在的主要問(wèn)題104-105    6.6 我國(guó)農(nóng)村土地有效流轉(zhuǎn)的城鄉(xiāng)統(tǒng)籌機(jī)制105-109        6.6.1 明確界定土地產(chǎn)權(quán)的權(quán)能,為農(nóng)村土地流轉(zhuǎn)確立現(xiàn)實(shí)基礎(chǔ)105-106        6.6.2 建立土地資產(chǎn)價(jià)格評(píng)估體系,為土地市場(chǎng)化流轉(zhuǎn)提供前提106-107        6.6.3 建設(shè)土地使用權(quán)流轉(zhuǎn)市場(chǎng),培育土地使用權(quán)流轉(zhuǎn)的中介組織107-108        6.6.4 推廣土地經(jīng)營(yíng)權(quán)證券化,促進(jìn)土地資源的優(yōu)化配置108        6.6.5 加大城鄉(xiāng)統(tǒng)籌力度,創(chuàng)新推廣農(nóng)村土地流轉(zhuǎn)的成功模式108-1097. 城鄉(xiāng)統(tǒng)籌視角下農(nóng)民轉(zhuǎn)移性收入增長(zhǎng)研究——基于財(cái)政支農(nóng)的分析109-125    7.1 農(nóng)民轉(zhuǎn)移性收入和財(cái)政支農(nóng)支出的概念界定109-111        7.1.1 農(nóng)民轉(zhuǎn)移性收入的概念界定109-110        7.1.2 財(cái)政支農(nóng)的概念界定110-111    7.2 農(nóng)民轉(zhuǎn)移性收入增長(zhǎng)對(duì)于財(cái)政支農(nóng)的需求分析111-113        7.2.1 財(cái)政支農(nóng)對(duì)農(nóng)民轉(zhuǎn)移性收入增長(zhǎng)的必要性111-112        7.2.2 財(cái)政支農(nóng)對(duì)農(nóng)民轉(zhuǎn)移性收入增長(zhǎng)的重要性112-113    7.3 農(nóng)民轉(zhuǎn)移性收入的結(jié)構(gòu)性分析113-114    7.4 基于縮小城鄉(xiāng)居民收入差距的財(cái)政支農(nóng)規(guī)模優(yōu)化分析114-117    7.5 城鄉(xiāng)統(tǒng)籌視角下農(nóng)民增收的財(cái)政支農(nóng)政策路徑選擇117-122    7.6 城鄉(xiāng)統(tǒng)籌視角下促進(jìn)農(nóng)民增收的財(cái)政支農(nóng)政策122-125        7.6.1 加大財(cái)政支農(nóng)力度,保證財(cái)政支農(nóng)資金總量的穩(wěn)定增長(zhǎng)122-123        7.6.2 優(yōu)化財(cái)政支農(nóng)結(jié)構(gòu)123-124        7.6.3 完善財(cái)政支農(nóng)政策和制度,規(guī)范財(cái)政支農(nóng)行為124-1258. 全文的總結(jié)與展望125-130    8.1 總結(jié)125-128    8.2 展望128-130參考文獻(xiàn)130-137后記137-138致謝138-139攻讀博士學(xué)位期間主要科研成果139

  本文關(guān)鍵詞：城鄉(xiāng)統(tǒng)籌視角下我國(guó)農(nóng)民收入增長(zhǎng)問(wèn)題研究，，由筆耕文化傳播整理發(fā)布。