【摘要】：當(dāng)前我國正處于從傳統(tǒng)農(nóng)業(yè)向現(xiàn)代化工業(yè)的轉(zhuǎn)型期,隨著國民經(jīng)濟(jì)的快速發(fā)展和國民民主意識的不斷提高,原來自上而下的壓力型管理模式面臨著前所未有的挑戰(zhàn)。民主化治理模式作為化解干群矛盾、調(diào)解人民內(nèi)部糾紛、促進(jìn)經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展、遏制腐敗的最佳制度選擇,順應(yīng)時代發(fā)展要求,因此,大力推進(jìn)基層民主建設(shè)已經(jīng)迫在眉睫。 盡管我國的村民自治實踐開始于1978年,至今已逾30多年,然而劉樓村的基層民主建設(shè)并不容樂觀�！按迕褡灾巍毙问交⑿姓F(xiàn)象使得基層民主流于形式,該現(xiàn)狀主要由經(jīng)濟(jì)欠發(fā)達(dá)、政治體制高度集權(quán)、民主文化底蘊(yùn)淺、鄉(xiāng)村勢力代償司法功能以及相關(guān)自治法律不健全等諸多因素所致。經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展程度和具體形式直接決定著村民的民主意識和民主參與程度；現(xiàn)行的政治體制是阻礙當(dāng)前劉樓村基層民主建設(shè)又一基本因素,也是導(dǎo)致腐敗和干群矛盾的深層原因；民主文化在經(jīng)濟(jì)基礎(chǔ)和上層建筑日益鞏固的基礎(chǔ)上逐漸衍生,只有前兩者達(dá)到一定的發(fā)展層次,并在現(xiàn)實中踐行了民主,民主文化才能日益鞏固和發(fā)展,才能發(fā)揮保障和推動民主的法制化和制度化作用。 作為一個地處豫東欠發(fā)達(dá)地區(qū)的行政村,劉樓村的基層民主建設(shè)的必要條件遠(yuǎn)不及南方發(fā)達(dá)地區(qū)充分,所面臨的困境和誘導(dǎo)因素以及相應(yīng)的治理途徑也同南方相去甚遠(yuǎn)。針對劉樓村基層民主建設(shè)滯后的特殊性因素,論文提出一套綜合性改革方案,以政治體制革新和經(jīng)濟(jì)調(diào)整為主體,以強(qiáng)化民主文化積淀、依法治理鄉(xiāng)村家族勢力、完善相關(guān)自治法律為側(cè)翼,以求有效解決現(xiàn)存的諸多問題。同時,劉樓村作為中原地區(qū)一個村級民主建設(shè)縮影,以其作為個案研究,探求農(nóng)村基層民主建設(shè)的路徑,對國家的農(nóng)村基層民主建設(shè)有一定借鑒意義和參考價值。
[Abstract]:At present, our country is in the transition period from traditional agriculture to modern industry. With the rapid development of national economy and the continuous improvement of national democratic consciousness, the original top-down pressure management model is facing unprecedented challenges. As the best system choice for resolving contradictions between cadres and masses, mediating disputes among the people, promoting economic development, curbing corruption, and complying with the requirements of the development of the times, it is urgent to vigorously promote the construction of democracy at the grass-roots level. Although the practice of villager autonomy in China began in 1978 and has been more than 30 years, the construction of grass-roots democracy in Liu Lou Village is not optimistic. The formalization of "villager autonomy" and the phenomenon of administration make grass-roots democracy become mere formality. This situation is mainly caused by many factors, such as underdeveloped economy, highly centralized political system, shallow democratic culture, judicial function of rural forces to compensate for it and imperfect relevant autonomy laws. The degree and concrete form of economic development directly determine the democratic consciousness and participation of villagers, and the current political system is another basic factor hindering the construction of democracy at the grass-roots level in Liu Lou Village, and it is also the deep cause of corruption and the contradiction between cadres and the masses. Democratic culture is gradually derived from the economic foundation and superstructure. Only when the first two reach a certain level of development and practice democracy in reality, can democratic culture be consolidated and developed day by day, and can play a role in ensuring and promoting the legalization and institutionalization of democracy. As an administrative village located in the underdeveloped areas of eastern Henan, the necessary conditions for the grass-roots democratic construction of Liu Lou Village are far less sufficient than those in the developed areas of the south, and the difficulties, inducements and corresponding governance ways are also far from those in the south. In view of the special factors of the lag of the grass-roots democratic construction in Liu Lou Village, this paper puts forward a set of comprehensive reform scheme, which takes the political system innovation and economic adjustment as the main body, strengthens the accumulation of democratic culture, governs the rural family forces according to law, and perfects the relevant autonomy laws as the flanks, in order to effectively solve many existing problems. At the same time, Liu Lou Village, as a microcosm of village-level democracy construction in Central Plains, takes it as a case study to explore the path of rural grass-roots democracy construction, which has certain reference significance and reference value for the construction of rural grass-roots democracy in the country.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：石河子大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號】：D422.6

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 賀雪峰;制度引入與利益主導(dǎo)——余村村委會換屆選舉的觀察與思考[J];管理世界;1999年05期

2 劉振峰;;從河南永城市實例看基層民主建設(shè)[J];廣西青年干部學(xué)院學(xué)報;2010年04期

3 郭正林;鄉(xiāng)村治理及其制度績效評估:學(xué)理性案例分析[J];華中師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(人文社會科學(xué)版);2004年04期

4 唐曉騰;社會變遷中的宗族與基層政府:1950—1979 對江西省古竹村的個案分析[J];江西社會科學(xué);2002年04期

5 何新忠;欠發(fā)達(dá)地區(qū)地方政府“企業(yè)化”行為考察[J];科學(xué)決策;1998年05期

6 陳雙鵬,陳鴻惠;基層組織與鄉(xiāng)村治理[J];蘭州學(xué)刊;2004年04期

7 何增科;人類發(fā)展與治理引論[J];馬克思主義與現(xiàn)實;2002年06期

8 江平;;國家與社會——論中國現(xiàn)今法律觀念之變化[J];南京大學(xué)法律評論;1996年01期

9 胡永佳;村民自治、農(nóng)村民主與中國政治發(fā)展[J];政治學(xué)研究;2000年02期

10 郭道暉;論國家權(quán)力與社會權(quán)力──從人民與人大的法權(quán)關(guān)系談起[J];法制與社會發(fā)展;1995年02期

相關(guān)重要報紙文章 前1條

1 本報記者 崔士鑫;[N];人民日報;2000年

，

本文編號：2506687