發(fā)布時間：2019-03-05 15:10

【摘要】：關(guān)于信訪制度去向的各種方案,加強(qiáng)論與法治相悖,廢除論則過于簡單。改革論可取,但鮮見治本之策和具體可行的方案。筆者主張將信訪現(xiàn)象根據(jù)其背后的問題進(jìn)行類型化,在此基礎(chǔ)上分別研究其法治化的解決方案以及與其對應(yīng)的信訪制度的轉(zhuǎn)型和改革。 本文先是從涉法涉訴信訪成因的角度分析和展現(xiàn)了涉法涉訴信訪面臨的問題,從三個方面探討了涉法涉訴信訪法治化的路徑。先是檢討了我國的法治實(shí)踐和理論,進(jìn)而提出涉法涉訴信訪法治化的根本路徑即法治的中國化。又在涉法涉訴信訪訴求類型化分析的基礎(chǔ)上檢討了我國訴訟機(jī)制存在的漏洞,提出了將各類涉法涉訴信訪訴求加以訴權(quán)化改造,并完善訴訟程序以實(shí)現(xiàn)和保障訴權(quán),進(jìn)而將各種涉法涉訴信訪盡可能地納入訴訟體系,此為微觀方面的具體方案。最后檢討了政治、社會因素與涉法涉訴信訪法治化的沖突或阻礙,并提了出用法治理性引導(dǎo)和重建政治、社會理性的具體建議,為涉法涉訴信訪法治化提供可能的政治、社會環(huán)境,此為宏觀方面的具體方案。
[Abstract]:The strengthening theory is contrary to the rule of law and the abrogation theory is too simple. Reform theory can be taken, but rarely see the root of the solution and concrete and feasible plan. The author advocates that the phenomenon of letters and visits should be typed according to the problems behind them. On this basis, the author will study the solutions to the rule of law and the transformation and reform of the corresponding system of letters and visits respectively. This paper first analyzes and shows the problems faced by the legal-related complaint and petition from the perspective of the causes of the legal-related complaint and petition, and probes into the path of the legalization of the legal-related lawsuit-related complaint from three aspects. Firstly, the author reviews the practice and theory of the rule of law in our country, and then puts forward the basic path of ruling by law, that is, the rule of law in China. On the basis of the analysis of the types of complaints and petitions involved in law, this paper reviews the loopholes existing in the litigation mechanism of our country, puts forward the idea of transforming all kinds of claims related to litigation into rights of appeal, and consummates the litigation procedure to realize and protect the right of action. Furthermore, all kinds of legal-related complaints and visits are brought into the litigation system as far as possible, which is a micro-specific scheme. Finally, the paper reviews the conflicts or obstacles between political, social factors and the legalization of letters and visits involving in the law, and puts forward concrete suggestions for guiding and rebuilding politics and social rationality with the rationality of the rule of law, in order to provide possible politics for the legalization of letters and petitions involving the law. Social environment, this is macroscopical aspect concrete plan.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：蘭州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號】：D925

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前9條

1 王亞新;;“再審之訴”的再辨析[J];法商研究;2006年04期

2 彭浩;;涉訴信訪終結(jié)相關(guān)理論問題之澄清[J];廣西政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報;2010年02期

3 張衛(wèi)平;;起訴難:一個中國問題的思索[J];法學(xué)研究;2009年06期

4 范忠信;;法制(治)中國化:歷史法學(xué)的中國使命(論綱)[J];理論月刊;2011年01期

5 蘇力;;法條主義、民意與難辦案件[J];中外法學(xué);2009年01期

6 周永坤;訴權(quán)法理研究論綱[J];中國法學(xué);2004年05期

7 王亞新;;民事審判監(jiān)督制度整體的程序設(shè)計(jì)——以《民事訴訟法修正案》為出發(fā)點(diǎn)[J];中國法學(xué);2007年05期

8 蘇力;;關(guān)于能動司法與大調(diào)解[J];中國法學(xué);2010年01期

9 強(qiáng)世功;邁向立法者的法理學(xué)——法律移植背景下對當(dāng)代法理學(xué)的反思[J];中國社會科學(xué);2005年01期

，

本文編號：2435038