【摘要】：中國新一輪經(jīng)濟體制改革的核心是處理好政府和市場的關系,使市場在資源配置中起決定性作用和更好的發(fā)揮政府作用,解決市場體系完善、政府干預過多和監(jiān)管不到位問題,價格規(guī)制是經(jīng)濟管理的重要手段之一,十八大三中全會提出“要完善主要由市場決定價格的機制。凡是能由市場形成的價格都交給市場,政府不進行不當干預。推進水、石油、天然氣、電力、交通、電信等領域價格改革,放開競爭性環(huán)節(jié)價格。政府定價范圍主要限定在重要公用事業(yè)、公益性服務、網(wǎng)絡型自然壟斷環(huán)節(jié)。完善農(nóng)產(chǎn)品價格形成機制,注重發(fā)揮市場形成價格作用”。本文研究云南省公用事業(yè)價格規(guī)制存在問題,提出改善之道,對今后公用事業(yè)價格理論的探索具有一定的理論意義。 改革開放30年,我國公用事業(yè)的價格規(guī)制工作推進了價格規(guī)制的政府定價目錄、政府價格聽證決策辦法、價格監(jiān)審為核心價格體系建設,但隨著社會經(jīng)濟的發(fā)展和民主進程的推進,價格規(guī)制中科學性、民主性、法治化方面仍存在問題：第一,在公用事業(yè)產(chǎn)品的規(guī)制內(nèi)容上,整個公用事業(yè)產(chǎn)品全線價格都是政府定價,沒有按照壟斷性和競爭性環(huán)節(jié)進行分類定價；第二,由于壟斷企業(yè)自身存在的信息不對稱屬性,使公用事業(yè)企業(yè)存在俘虜規(guī)制部門和虛報成本的存會,致使現(xiàn)有的成本監(jiān)審和成本加成法定價模型失效。第三,價格決策中的信息不公開、聽證程序不規(guī)范使公用事業(yè)產(chǎn)品的價格聽證會一直處于社會的風口浪尖,網(wǎng)絡、報紙、甚至于主流媒體都出現(xiàn)水價、電費價格聽證不公開、不透明、“暗箱操作”,“逢聽必漲”、“逢漲必聽”等輿論,價格規(guī)制部門的公信力遭到社會各界的質疑。第四,有關公用事業(yè)價格方面的法律和監(jiān)督機制不完善。筆者借鑒國內(nèi)外放松規(guī)制理論、激勵規(guī)制理論和西方成熟的價格聽證會實踐等價格規(guī)制理論,對云南省的公用事業(yè)價格規(guī)制的現(xiàn)狀、存在問題、可改進的方向進行了初步的探討、分析與研究。
[Abstract]:The core of China's new round of economic restructuring is to properly handle the relationship between the government and the market, so that the market can play a decisive role in the allocation of resources and give better play to the role of the government, so as to solve the problems of perfecting the market system, excessive government intervention and inadequate supervision. Price regulation is one of the important means of economic management. Any price that can be formed by the market is given to the market, and the government does not interfere improperly. Promote water, oil, natural gas, electricity, transportation, telecommunications and other areas of price reform, liberalize competitive link prices. The range of government pricing is limited to important public utilities, public welfare services and network natural monopoly. Improve the agricultural product price formation mechanism, pay attention to give play to the role of market formation price. This paper studies the problems existing in the price regulation of public utilities in Yunnan Province, and puts forward some ways to improve it, which has certain theoretical significance for the exploration of the price theory of public utilities in the future. After 30 years of reform and opening up, the price regulation of public utilities in China has promoted the construction of the government pricing catalogue of price regulation, the decision-making method of government price hearing, and the construction of price supervision and examination as the core price system. However, with the development of social economy and the advancement of democratic process, there are still some problems in price regulation in the aspects of science, democracy and rule of law: first, in the content of regulation of public utility products, The whole line price of the whole public utility product is the government price, and it is not classified according to the monopoly and the competitive link. Second, because of the information asymmetry attribute of the monopoly enterprise itself, The existing cost supervision and audit model and cost addition pricing model are invalid due to the existence of captive regulatory departments and the existence of false cost statements in public utility enterprises. Third, the information in price decision-making is not disclosed, and the hearing procedures are not standardized so that the price hearings of public utilities products have always been at the forefront of social unrest. Water prices appear in the Internet, newspapers, and even the mainstream media, and the hearings on electricity prices are not disclosed. Opaque, "dark box operation", "every hearing will rise", "every rise must listen" and other public opinion, the credibility of price regulation departments have been questioned by all walks of life. Fourth, the law and supervision mechanism on the price of public utilities are not perfect. The author draws lessons from the domestic and foreign deregulation theory, the incentive regulation theory and the western mature price hearing practice and so on price regulation theory, to Yunnan Province public utility price regulation present situation, exists the question. The direction of improvement is discussed, analyzed and studied.
【學位授予單位】：云南大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：D630

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 徐云鵬;;中美價格聽證程序比較研究[J];河南財政稅務高等專科學校學報;2011年05期

2 李成仁;余嘉明;;日韓居民階梯電價經(jīng)驗與啟示[J];能源技術經(jīng)濟;2010年07期

3 張春虎;;公用事業(yè)改革的國際經(jīng)驗及借鑒[J];管理觀察;2009年03期

4 楊帆;梁邦海;;我國地方政府公用事業(yè)管理變遷研究[J];湖南社會科學;2012年05期

5 任丹;;發(fā)達國家公用事業(yè)改革的經(jīng)驗及啟示[J];城鄉(xiāng)建設;2014年02期

6 李在峰;我國壟斷產(chǎn)業(yè)的價格管制及改革[J];價格月刊;2001年01期

7 李秉坤;譚婷婷;;市政公用事業(yè)市場化改革政府監(jiān)管之價格管制分析[J];商業(yè)經(jīng)濟;2012年06期

8 遲麗娟;滕威;;對價格機制改革的探析[J];經(jīng)濟研究導刊;2008年11期

9 吳麟麟;盧海琴;;基于定價博弈的城際客運交通價格管制分析[J];江蘇大學學報(社會科學版);2012年02期

10 蘇霞;;我國市政公用事業(yè)改革中存在的問題及其對策[J];價值工程;2012年02期

，

本文編號：2218554