民主作為一種人格品質(zhì)——寫(xiě)在杜威教育哲學(xué)的延長(zhǎng)線上
發(fā)布時(shí)間:2018-08-03 12:53
【摘要】:民主是杜威教育哲學(xué)中的首要概念。不過(guò),杜威并不滿足于自由主義者之前所構(gòu)造的那種占據(jù)統(tǒng)治地位的"程序性民主"的政治概念,而是對(duì)民主抱有更多的期待。作為一個(gè)民主社會(huì)主義者,杜威提出了"道德性民主"的概念。在杜威著名的"民主作為一種生活方式"的觀點(diǎn)背后,隱藏著"民主作為一種人格品質(zhì)"的前提假設(shè),而且后者乃是他將民主與教育二者看作一個(gè)不可分割之整體的關(guān)鍵要素;仡櫼呀(jīng)過(guò)去的20世紀(jì),陶行知等人曾結(jié)合中國(guó)當(dāng)時(shí)的實(shí)際,創(chuàng)造性地繼承并發(fā)展了這一平民主義的教育傳統(tǒng),極大地推動(dòng)了現(xiàn)代中國(guó)社會(huì)和學(xué)校教育的民主化進(jìn)程。展望21世紀(jì),民主作為人格品質(zhì)的觀念,將有助于國(guó)人轉(zhuǎn)變封建專制時(shí)代聚焦"君主人格"的儒家傳統(tǒng)觀念,將其上升為國(guó)家(政府)的"法人人格",以便全體國(guó)民對(duì)為其服務(wù)的政府法人的公共政策、行政指令和工作方式等進(jìn)行一種法律監(jiān)督和人格評(píng)價(jià)。更為重要的是,全體國(guó)民是否愿意和能夠進(jìn)行這項(xiàng)監(jiān)督與評(píng)價(jià)本身,也現(xiàn)實(shí)性地說(shuō)明了這些國(guó)民自身是否已經(jīng)具備這種民主的人格品質(zhì)。
[Abstract]:Democracy is the primary concept in Dewey's educational philosophy. Dewey, however, is not satisfied with the political concept of "procedural democracy", which was previously constructed by liberals, but has more expectations of democracy. As a democratic socialist, Dewey put forward the concept of moral democracy. Behind Dewey's famous view of "democracy as a way of life", the premise hypothesis of "democracy as a quality of personality" is hidden, and the latter is the key element for him to regard democracy and education as an indivisible whole. Looking back on the past 20th century, Tao Xingzhi and others creatively inherited and developed this populist educational tradition combined with the reality of China at that time, which greatly promoted the democratization of modern Chinese society and school education. Looking forward to the 21st century, democracy as a concept of personality quality will help people to change the feudal autocratic era focusing on the "monarch personality" of the Confucian tradition, Raise it to the "legal personality" of the state (government), so that all the citizens can carry out a kind of legal supervision and personality evaluation on the public policy, administrative instruction and working method of the government legal person who serves it. More importantly, whether or not all citizens are willing and able to carry out this monitoring and evaluation itself, also realistically shows whether these people already possess this democratic personality.
【作者單位】: 華東師范大學(xué)教育學(xué)系;
【基金】:教育部人文社會(huì)科學(xué)研究一般項(xiàng)目“轉(zhuǎn)型期我國(guó)公民教育的哲學(xué)基礎(chǔ)研究”[12YJC880112];教育部哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)2012年度重大課題攻關(guān)項(xiàng)目“社會(huì)主義核心價(jià)值體系融入國(guó)民教育的路徑、方法創(chuàng)新研究”[12JZD001]
【分類號(hào)】:G40-09
[Abstract]:Democracy is the primary concept in Dewey's educational philosophy. Dewey, however, is not satisfied with the political concept of "procedural democracy", which was previously constructed by liberals, but has more expectations of democracy. As a democratic socialist, Dewey put forward the concept of moral democracy. Behind Dewey's famous view of "democracy as a way of life", the premise hypothesis of "democracy as a quality of personality" is hidden, and the latter is the key element for him to regard democracy and education as an indivisible whole. Looking back on the past 20th century, Tao Xingzhi and others creatively inherited and developed this populist educational tradition combined with the reality of China at that time, which greatly promoted the democratization of modern Chinese society and school education. Looking forward to the 21st century, democracy as a concept of personality quality will help people to change the feudal autocratic era focusing on the "monarch personality" of the Confucian tradition, Raise it to the "legal personality" of the state (government), so that all the citizens can carry out a kind of legal supervision and personality evaluation on the public policy, administrative instruction and working method of the government legal person who serves it. More importantly, whether or not all citizens are willing and able to carry out this monitoring and evaluation itself, also realistically shows whether these people already possess this democratic personality.
【作者單位】: 華東師范大學(xué)教育學(xué)系;
【基金】:教育部人文社會(huì)科學(xué)研究一般項(xiàng)目“轉(zhuǎn)型期我國(guó)公民教育的哲學(xué)基礎(chǔ)研究”[12YJC880112];教育部哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)2012年度重大課題攻關(guān)項(xiàng)目“社會(huì)主義核心價(jià)值體系融入國(guó)民教育的路徑、方法創(chuàng)新研究”[12JZD001]
【分類號(hào)】:G40-09
【相似文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 劉瑞寧;20世紀(jì)西方教育哲學(xué)評(píng)述[J];陜西省行政學(xué)院.陜西省經(jīng)濟(jì)管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2000年03期
2 石中英;;20世紀(jì)中國(guó)教育哲學(xué)的回顧與展望[J];教育研究與實(shí)驗(yàn);2000年05期
3 陶志瓊;論教育哲學(xué)的使命──兼論其在培養(yǎng)師范生特色素質(zhì)中的價(jià)值[J];西南師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(人文社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2001年06期
4 龐學(xué)光;教育哲學(xué)的本質(zhì)與特點(diǎn)新論[J];天津市教科院學(xué)報(bào);2001年04期
5 唐芬芬;永恒主義教育哲學(xué)與文化的普同論[J];青海師專學(xué)報(bào);2002年04期
6 鐘祖榮;論教育哲學(xué)的范疇及其關(guān)系[J];雁北師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2002年03期
7 金生,
本文編號(hào):2161803
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/shekelunwen/minzhuminquanlunwen/2161803.html
最近更新
教材專著