本文選題：上訪者 + 政治心理�。� 參考：《西南政法大學》2013年碩士論文

【摘要】：當下，由于我國處于社會轉型期，社會矛盾多發(fā)，上訪也就成為一條較為重要的利益表達通道。不過，由于民主法制尚不健全等各方面因素的影響，上訪具有較高的風險性，甚至相當一部分的上訪者利益訴求非但沒實現(xiàn)反而遭受打擊報復。那么，為什么一些老上訪戶還會重復上訪？上訪對他們的政治心理帶來了怎樣的影響？上訪中的什么因素導致了他們政治心理的變化？這些抗爭政治的后果問題，，正是本研究的主題。 結合本研究的實證特性，在方法論選擇上，本研究以量化研究為主，通過數(shù)據(jù)分析、比較研究等方法來實現(xiàn)研究目的。本研究共分為五部分。其中，第一部分為緒論，主要介紹研究的主題、意義、目前研究的現(xiàn)狀、數(shù)據(jù)來源以及研究假設；第二部分關注的重點是上訪者政治心理在上訪過程中經(jīng)歷了怎樣的變化；第三部分是本研究的重點，該部分集中討論了哪些因素影響了上訪者政治心理特征的形成；第四部分的關注點為，解釋老上訪戶形成的心理動機及政府因素；第五部分為本研究的結論部分，在這里，本研究除了得出結論外，也提出了一些政策建議。 通過數(shù)據(jù)資料的整理與分析，本研究發(fā)現(xiàn)，上訪者的政治心理與非上訪者相比，具有顯著變化，主要表現(xiàn)在：政治認知水平較高，但是政治情感、政治效能感、政治信任均具消極色彩。但總體上而言，上訪者的政治心理趨向尚在可控的范圍內。在影響因素方面，本研究發(fā)現(xiàn)：除政治認知外，上訪頻次對上訪者的政治情感、政治信任、政治效能感都具有顯著消極影響；政府應對上訪的方式與上訪者的政治情感、政治信任、政治效能感之間具有正相關性；上訪者的生活滿意度與上訪者的政治情感、政治效能感之間也呈現(xiàn)出正向的統(tǒng)計顯著性。此外，本研究也發(fā)現(xiàn)，上訪者之所產生進京訪的心理動機與地方政府的回應方式及他們對政府機構的信任層級有關。
[Abstract]:At present, because our country is in the social transition period, the social contradiction is frequent, the petition also becomes a relatively important interest expression channel. However, due to the influence of various factors, such as the imperfect democracy and the legal system, petition has a high risk, and even quite a part of the petitioners' interests are not realized, but they are retaliated. So, why do some old petitioners repeat their petitions? How does the petition affect their political psychology? What factors caused the change of their political psychology? According to the empirical characteristics of this study, this research focuses on quantitative research, data analysis, comparative research and other methods to achieve the purpose of the research. This study is divided into five parts. Among them, the first part is the introduction, mainly introduces the research theme, the significance, the present research present situation, the data source and the research hypothesis; the second part focuses on how the petitioners' political psychology has experienced in the process of petition; The third part is the focus of this study, which focuses on the factors that affect the formation of the political psychological characteristics of the petitioners, the fourth part focuses on explaining the psychological motivation of the old petitioners and government factors. The fifth part is the conclusion of this study. Here, in addition to the conclusions, this study also puts forward some policy recommendations. Through the collation and analysis of the data, it is found that the political psychology of the petitioners is compared with that of the non-petitioners. There are significant changes, mainly in the high level of political cognition, but the sense of political emotion, political efficacy and political trust are all negative. But on the whole, the political psychological trend of the petitioners is still under control. In terms of influencing factors, this study found that, in addition to political cognition, the frequency of petition has a significant negative impact on the political emotion, political trust and political efficacy of the petitioners, the way the government responds to the petition and the political feelings of the petitioners. There is a positive correlation between the political trust and the sense of political efficacy, and there is a positive statistical significance between the life satisfaction of the petitioners and the political emotion and the political efficacy of the petitioners. In addition, this study also found that the psychological motivation of the petitioners to visit Beijing is related to the response of local governments and their level of trust in government institutions.
【學位授予單位】：西南政法大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：D632.8

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 常倩;;贏利型上訪、贏利型經(jīng)紀與基層社會參與[J];東南學術;2012年03期

2 于建嶸;;對560名進京上訪者的調查[J];法律與生活;2007年10期

3 陳輝;;政治挫折感:上訪老戶的心理特征[J];理論視野;2009年10期

4 尹利民;尹平方;;“治訪循環(huán)”現(xiàn)象的生成邏輯——基于宏觀政治環(huán)境與微觀行動相結合視角的分析[J];南昌大學學報(人文社會科學版);2010年01期

5 于建嶸;;利益博弈與抗爭性政治——當代中國社會沖突的政治社會學理解[J];中國農業(yè)大學學報(社會科學版);2009年01期

6 吳長青;;從“策略”到“倫理” 對“依法抗爭”的批評性討論[J];社會;2010年02期

7 于建嶸;當前農民維權活動的一個解釋框架[J];社會學研究;2004年02期

8 楊華;;稅費改革后農村信訪困局的治理根源——以農民上訪的主要類型為分析基礎[J];云南大學學報(法學版);2011年04期

9 王敏;政治態(tài)度:涵義、成因與研究走向[J];云南行政學院學報;2001年01期

10 饒靜;葉敬忠;譚思;;“要挾型上訪”——底層政治邏輯下的農民上訪分析框架[J];中國農村觀察;2011年03期

本文編號：1999885